Aa
Symptoms From a 1988 exposure
Doctor,
This is a different exposure scenario than my previous post.
In 1988 I had unprotected vaginal sex with a older woman. She was menstrating at the time. One month after the encounter I got an UTI, five months later I started having strange symptoms such as rash, low fever (99), and difficulty swallowing.
She told be she was "clean" and was HIV negative. After I told her about the UTI she was alarmed. I asked her to re-tested, at which point she asked me to stop contacting/harassing her.(By the way, I believe she is still alive-she has a web-site for her business).
As the fever lingered I went through a succesion of doctors and AIDS tests to determine my status. The initial doctor said it was an "adverse" reaction to tetracycline-out to one year all the antibody tests were negative.
As time went on the fever petered out. During the period 1993-2006, I was tested by the ELISA antibody test at least 20 times for purposes of blood donations, life insurance, and adoption. I relied on the test. In 2005 the ELISA included a NAT test. My last anti-body test was July 2006. Maybe reliance was a mistake?
Although I can take some solace in my August 2006 T-cell count of 1160, 55%, I am now experiencing the following symptoms. 16 month bout of diarrhea and chills. In the last two weeks I have had a low grade fever up to 99.1 (I'm usually cooler), hot flashes, and a nose infection which is being treated with Bactrim.
My questions:
(1) Do you still believe that the modern ELISA test will not give a false negative in this situation? What other testing should be pursued (if any)?
(2) Is 18 years a long time post exposure prior to symptomatic HIV infection? My ID doc said this is not possible?
(3) Is the 2005 NAT test a saving grace here-could it be false negative? Or is it meant only to catch early infections?
Thursday I see the ID doc again. My regards and I will await your answer. Thanks
This is a different exposure scenario than my previous post.
In 1988 I had unprotected vaginal sex with a older woman. She was menstrating at the time. One month after the encounter I got an UTI, five months later I started having strange symptoms such as rash, low fever (99), and difficulty swallowing.
She told be she was "clean" and was HIV negative. After I told her about the UTI she was alarmed. I asked her to re-tested, at which point she asked me to stop contacting/harassing her.(By the way, I believe she is still alive-she has a web-site for her business).
As the fever lingered I went through a succesion of doctors and AIDS tests to determine my status. The initial doctor said it was an "adverse" reaction to tetracycline-out to one year all the antibody tests were negative.
As time went on the fever petered out. During the period 1993-2006, I was tested by the ELISA antibody test at least 20 times for purposes of blood donations, life insurance, and adoption. I relied on the test. In 2005 the ELISA included a NAT test. My last anti-body test was July 2006. Maybe reliance was a mistake?
Although I can take some solace in my August 2006 T-cell count of 1160, 55%, I am now experiencing the following symptoms. 16 month bout of diarrhea and chills. In the last two weeks I have had a low grade fever up to 99.1 (I'm usually cooler), hot flashes, and a nose infection which is being treated with Bactrim.
My questions:
(1) Do you still believe that the modern ELISA test will not give a false negative in this situation? What other testing should be pursued (if any)?
(2) Is 18 years a long time post exposure prior to symptomatic HIV infection? My ID doc said this is not possible?
(3) Is the 2005 NAT test a saving grace here-could it be false negative? Or is it meant only to catch early infections?
Thursday I see the ID doc again. My regards and I will await your answer. Thanks
MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL
Oh, come on now. Your test results prove with absolute certainty you don't have HIV. Anyway, I agree with your ID doct: if you really were infected 18 years ago, you are extremely articulate for a dead man--which is what you would have been by now. If this question is the only reason you are planning to see the ID specialist again, I suggest you save your money, time and energy--and his or hers.
Regards-- HHH, MD
Regards-- HHH, MD
You had numerous NEGATIVE tests which means you DON'T HAVE HIV. What don't you get about that? Anyway, even if you did, you probably would be close to death by now after 18 years with no treatment. Stop driving yourself nuts.
First of all, you don't have HIV. You've had a TON of tests over 18 years. None of your symptoms are even remotely like HIV, and a fever of up to 99 isn't a fever at all. I also seriously doubt you're having hot flashes, except those that may be due to anxiety. You don't even sound unusually sick... you sound like a perfectly normal human being to me.
As for your partner's behavior, if she really was alarmed by your UTI, she probably thought you may have given HER a STD. From the tone of your post, I'm also guessing that you may have been rather insistent and quite anxious in your contacts with her, which probably really did constitute harrassment. I'm sure she didn't have HIV, and you don't either.
I do think counseling is in order. You definitely don't need further testing, and anyone who keeps testing you for HIV after all these negative tests (assuming you've had no other risks) must be behaving unethically. You might, however, want to talk with your doctor about your anxiety around HIV, and about possibly starting meds to help you as you begin to work through this in therapy.
As for your partner's behavior, if she really was alarmed by your UTI, she probably thought you may have given HER a STD. From the tone of your post, I'm also guessing that you may have been rather insistent and quite anxious in your contacts with her, which probably really did constitute harrassment. I'm sure she didn't have HIV, and you don't either.
I do think counseling is in order. You definitely don't need further testing, and anyone who keeps testing you for HIV after all these negative tests (assuming you've had no other risks) must be behaving unethically. You might, however, want to talk with your doctor about your anxiety around HIV, and about possibly starting meds to help you as you begin to work through this in therapy.
wow, I thought maybe I was a bit obsessive. You are definitely fine and should seriously seek professional help as you are losing time out of your life over nothing. You will never get this time back so truly try to let this go and move on.
You are reading content posted in the HIV - Prevention Forum
Condoms are the most effective way to prevent HIV and STDs.
PrEP is used by people with high risk to prevent HIV infection.
Can I get HIV from surfaces, like toilet seats?
Can you get HIV from casual contact, like hugging?
Frequency of HIV testing depends on your risk.
Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) may help prevent HIV infection.
