Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
HIV Prevention  (Expert Forum)
 | 
blood exposure in mouth
Answered by
University of Washington Seattle - WA
This forum is limited to prevention of HIV and to safe sex in general. If you believe you might have been exposed to HIV and want help to judge your risk, would like advice about HIV testing, or have questions about the effectiveness of condoms or the risks associated with specific sexual practices, this is the site for you.

IMPORTANT

No questions will be accepted on the treatment of HIV/AIDS or its complications, viral load, and similar topics. If you have questions about a specific STD other than HIV/AIDS, please visit the STD Forum. Questions that do not pertain to the above topics will be removed from the forum.

If you have not done so, please review other threads in our archives for questions similar to yours and Dr. Handsfield's replies. Questions that duplicate other frequent ones, for which abundant replies exist, and that have little educational value for other forum users, will be DELETED WITHOUT RESPONSE. YOUR PAYMENT WILL NOT BE REFUNDED. The most common examples of such questions are those about low risk exposures to HIV, such as oral sex, condom- protected intercourse hand-to-genital exposure, and nonsexual contact with possibly infected blood or body fluids as well as symptoms of early HIV infection.

blood exposure in mouth

by justonce, Jan 16, 2007 12:00AM
Doc,



My story, I had an hiv + male partner. We engaged in protected sex once (vaginal intercourse) and had protected

oral sex once. That was several months ago and I since

tested neg. We have agreed not to engage in any further

sexual activities but on 1/2/07 we were in bed just holding

each other when I bit his nipple just playing around and

drew blood into my mouth, I swallowed without thinking,

several minutes later rinsed with water. He probably

bled from the nipple for a few seconds (several drops).

He is pos x 12 years and tends to be well controlled with meds.

at his last blood test he was at 159 viral load which was a

couple weeks before this incident. After I bit him I tasted

a small amount of blood on the very back of the tounge. I have

good oral hygiene, no open cuts or sores. I did brush my teeth

about 1.5 hours prior to this. We have no other risks, no

other std's and general good health. I went to the ER the following day out of fear and was prescribed a 28 day expanded 3 drug nPEP. The ER doc looked at me like I was already a goner.... so Doc, what are my chances? I read it's 1/1000 for

a blood splash to a mucous membrane. If so, should I expect

some reduction due to the pep (it was started within 36 hours of exposure). The relationship tanked due to the stress of all this. Also, when do you think I should follow up with my pcp?



Thanks for your help.  

by H. Hunter Handsfield, M.D., Jan 16, 2007 12:00AM
Your risk is low from this event.  The indications for PEP are borderline; many providers would not recommend it, or would leave the decision up to the patient.  Swallowing blood is no higher risk than mucous membrane exposure, maybe lower; in general, swallowing HIV in any fluid is pretty low risk.  And with your partner's very low viral load, the chance you were infected certainly was much lower than 1 in 1000.



I cannnot give direct personal advice for your care in this situation.  Presumably the ER referred you to a provider experienced in HIV infections and in PEP.  If not, they should have.  Follow up with that provider, or find one yourself.  (You could phone the local health department or medical society to find someone, such as an infectious diseases specialist or other provider skilled in HIV care and PEP.)  In the meantime, continue your PEP until advised otherwise--but mellow out, knowing your risk of HIV was very low even without PEP.



Good luck--  HHH, MD
Member Comments (11)

by notAnExpert1, Jan 16, 2007 12:00AM
I think your chances of getting infected is zero or close to it. That much blood probably can not get you infected.

by justonce, Jan 16, 2007 12:00AM
The PAC I saw in the ER stated it was a "significant exposure"

and I have been exposed. He placed a call to the powers that be

in infection control (assumed to be an infectious disease

specialist) and loaded me with Combivar (SP) and another drug

I think is AZT (which my guy is allergic to).



I just want to know if I have the 1/1000 chance that is

cited in all the studies published or if I have better odds.



These drugs are tough to take but I'm 1/2 way home. If indeed

they do reduce transmission by some 80% I'll stick with them.



I was also wondering when I should follow up with a test.







by justonce, Jan 16, 2007 12:00AM
To: Doc HH
Thanks Doc, I didnt read your comment before my last post.



I will follow up. However, if you'd

please.. Are you saying that swallowing *** or any other

body fluid is about the same risk as swallowing blood?



Is it true that saliva inhibits the HIV virus?



Is an exposure in the mouth less than unprotected vaginal sex?



When should I follow up? I was refered to my Primary Doc not

a disease specialist. Is it imperitive that I see her now or

can I wait until I finish the meds ( I already have an appt in

a couple weeks). I understand if you can not answer questions

regarding treatment.



Thanks Doc, your words are reassuring to me. You have provided

some relief to a lot of people ...thanks again...

by H. Hunter Handsfield, M.D., Jan 16, 2007 12:00AM
To: justonce
In general, swallowing infected secretions is low risk.  I am unaware of comparative data for blood versus other secretions.  But to put the risk in context, HIV is present in the breast milk of infected, nursing women.  Yet over 1-2 years, only about 10-20% of babies nursed by infected women become infected.



Saliva inhibits HIV.  Mouth exposure or swallowing is much lower risk than unprotected vaginal sex.



People on PEP should be seen at least once during treatment, usually a couple of times, to check for side effects and general assessment.  Ask your provider what s/he recommends; or if s/he isn't up to speed on PEP, ask for referral to someone who is.



Glad to help.  Take care--  HHH, MD

by massguy, Jan 16, 2007 12:00AM
To: Everyone, DR H.
10-20% of infected babies that got infected from their mother's were receiving breast milk for weeks and months!  



Good luck - I hope your a-ok, I think you will be!

by shouldknowbetter, Jan 17, 2007 12:00AM
I am really not exactly sure what the following study says

but it appears that there is a different make up of the

virus in milk vs blood. I just hope we are not comparing

apples to oranges. Doc, this is not a challenge to what

you posted, I'm just frightened.



Conf Retrovir Opportunistic Infect 2004 Feb 8-11; 11:(abstract no. 93)



Edwards B, Ghosh M, Sabbaj S, Rhodes A, Decker D, Goepfert P, Aldrovandi G; Univ. of Alabama at Birmingham, USA and 2Childrens' Hosp. Los Angeles, CA, USA



BACKGROUND:

Transmission of HIV via breast milk is a significant source of pediatric infection, yet the majority of infants do not acquire infection through this route. This latter finding may be due to the low levels of HIV RNA in breast milk compared with plasma. We therefore hypothesized that the magnitude and quality of T cells in breast milk are different than the peripheral blood compartment as an explanation for the lower viral load in the former compartment.



CONCLUSIONS: T cells found in the breast milk compartment express a highly activated/effector phenotype that preferentially migrate to this area. These findings may not be specific for HIV, as other antigen responses also appear increased in breast milk. Nevertheless, our data are consistent with the hypothesis that increased numbers of activated HIV-specific CD8+ T cells result in lower viral RNA levels in the breast milk than peripheral blood compartments

by H. Hunter Handsfield, M.D., Jan 17, 2007 12:00AM
To: Everyone, shouldknowbetter
Of course the reason for the low transmission rate in nursing is multifactorial, and low levels of infecious HIV in breast