Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum. ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
Hepatitis C Community
This forum is for questions about medical issues and research aspects of Hepatitis C such as, questions about being newly diagnosed, questions about current treatments, information and participation in discussions about research studies and clinical trials related to Hepatitis. If you would like to communicate with other people who have been touched by Hepatitis, please visit our new Hepatitis Social/Living with Hepatitis forum
CBC question
by floppy, May 03, 2002 12:00AM
After first few weeks, those numbers dropped sharply from normal middle range values, to lower end scale (still normal) values.
Now after 10 weeks on treatment, there is a tendency of sligthly growing back, and looks like the decrease stopped, without even going to negative teritorries.
Is this a good sign, or a bad sign, or no relevance to the treatment?
Now after 10 weeks on treatment, there is a tendency of sligthly growing back, and looks like the decrease stopped, without even going to negative teritorries.
Is this a good sign, or a bad sign, or no relevance to the treatment?
Post Comment
