Treatment-induced loss of libido
Answered by
This forum is for questions and support regarding relationship issues such as: Abstinence, Arousal Problems, Birth Control, Cohabitation, Commitment, Communication, Couples Counseling, Desire /Lack of Desire, Sexual Technique.
For you to see what the problem is, I will review some elementary science. The whole target of chemotherapy for breast cancer for hormone receptor positive patients is to eliminate every possible shred of female hormone in the body, so that any stray cancer cells can't continue to thrive on it (i.e., thrive on the estrogen). Therefore, there is no reason to use anything for stimulation because there is NOTHING TO STIMULATE. Again, "Vaginal atrophy even with the Estring and lubrication continues to make sex painful, and I can satisfy my partner in other ways. However, sexu is now not a personal pleasure or reward but just an obligation, and that combined with such an extreme change in libido has instead turned closeness into a lifetime sentence.
Figuring out how to enjoy sex is not the goal here anymore because scientifically it won't happen. Estrogen is what makes sex enjoyable and estrogen feeds the cancer. Vibrators, lubrication, or champagne all require adequate hormonal physiology to accomplish enjoyment.
Why are doctors putting women in this situation without being up front about it, especially since chemotherapy only actually works LESS THAN 20% OF THE TIME, and most of the time when it does work, it only works for very very brief periods of time?
So how is something like Effexor or a vibrator going to get me out of this lifetime sentence?
AlaskaAngel