Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
Dermatology  (Expert Forum)
 | 
Pathology Finding - Part II
Answered by
Alan Rockoff, MD - dermatology, Child Skin Problems
The Rockoff Dermatology Center Brookline - MA
This forum is for questions regarding Dermatology issues, such as: skin rashes, acne, birthmarks, skin infections, rosacea, and general skin care.

Pathology Finding - Part II

by Palmer, Aug 08, 2004 12:00AM
Thank you for your response to my prior question.  What I failed to mention was that the biopsy was not a mole.  Sections of my arms, shoulders (both) were swollen (tissue was of lumpy consistency skin surface was had no blemishes nor moles).  My primary doctor took a punch hole sample of the skin and some tissue for a biopsy to be performed. As started prior, this was the findings: Junctional Nevus Moderate Cytology Atypia with Architectural Disorder recommendation to remove entire lesion for histology.  I also failed to type in the Lentiginous in the first question.  



I know what junctional nevus is ...A mole found in the junction (border) between the epidermis and dermis layers of the skin. These moles may be pigmented and slightly raised, and have a higher risk of developing into malignant melanoma.



Correct Findings: Junctional Lentiginous Nevus Moderate Cytology Atypia with Architectural Disorder recommendation to remove entire lesion for histology.



Does this makes a difference?

by Alan Rockoff, MD, Aug 10, 2004 12:00AM
No.  What the doctor found was a mole, whatever he was looking for.  I really can't make sense of looking at lumpy skin and finding a mole under the microscope--the doctor must have been looking at a pigmented spot, or else he wouldn't have found one.



You may be a bit confused.  As I suggested before, you need to talk to the physician who did the biopsy.  



Best.



Dr. Rockoff
Continue discussion
Expert Activity
Early Diagnosis of Peripheral Arter... 
Aug 31 by Lee Kirksey, MD
5 Steps to Medical Debt
Aug 30 by Adam R. Tanase, D.C.
Coronary Artery Disease - Risk fact... updated
Aug 26 by Cleveland Clinic
Related Expert Forums