Question Title: Optic Neuritis: is it MS, is it isolated ON? two diagnoses! Help!Forum: The Eye Care Forum
| ||||
|
Posted by Christine on April 16, 1999 at 22:20:35 Hello all. I've been reading the optic neuritis subject with interest and have not found my question so I'd thought I'd post. I'm a 42 year old white female with near perfect health record until the past year and one half. (Except thqt 9 years ago had a fever 100-101 after batteries of tests diagnosed as "FUO" (fever of unknown origin.)) And between Octo 97 and Jan 98 had six attacks of pancreatitis. Last May I had my first bout of Optic Neuritis in my left eye, as diagnosed by my Ophthamologist. I had an MRI, which was "clear" -- ruling out MS. The bout lasted a couple of months, and my vision did not return to normal. (mainly color reduction of reds and golds -- I'd say 20% but still had 20/20 acuity and bad pain, aching & upon movement) Neurologists ordered a Visual Evoked Potential which slight damage to left eye. Visual Field test should some blind spots Diagnoses was isolated ON. And was seconded by a second opinion buy Neuro-ophamologist at Jules Stein Eye Inst. In Dec/Jan of this year had a worsening of vision, but not pain. Ophthamologist confirmed another bout of ON in same eye. Spinal Tap was performed by Neurlogist. Abnormal results were: "Oligoclonal bands present in the CSF but not in the corresponding serum. This finding indicates abnormal synthesis of IgG in the CSF and is supportive evidence for MS." synthesis rate IgG, CSF: High: +7.9 in ref range: -9.9 to +3.3 All else in CSF appears normal. Had a second MRI : Results still "clear"
BUT My Ophthamologist says his opinion is that I've had two separate bouts of isolated Optic Neuritis and that his opinion is that I do NOT have MS and should NOT take the drugs. He said that the spinal tap is not enough eveidence to diagnose MS and that of course the readings would be "off" as I was still in a state of ON. (It was ~4 weeks after his exam) When I presented that argument to the neurologist he said the ophthamolgist was not correct. The neurologist agrees with the Ophthamolgist that I do not technically meet the MS criteria, but in his opinion says I have MS. My Internist is siding with the Neurologist. He says take the drugs. All of them say it is "my decision" (re: drug therapy). It feels like I have to make the decision which doctor to believe and to that end: I am deciding if I have MS or just isolated ON. Other possibly pertinent data: ANA was elevated. Lupus has been ruled out by Rheumatologist. Lyme has been tested for: neg. My Anticardiiolipin Antibodies ARE elevated at positive 25. I don't want this disease. I don't want to make the wrong decision. Any advice??? Torn between two doctors....
Christine (apologies for misspellings.)
Posted by hfhs md ke on April 17, 1999 at 09:20:38 christine-
|
| |||