Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
Urology  (Expert Forum)
 | 
Why not surgery instead of long term antibiotics
Answered by
Kevin Pho, MD - Internal Medicine
Kevin Pho, MD Boston - MA
Questions in the Urology forum are answered by Dr. Stephen Liroff, affiliated with the Henry Ford Hospital. Topics covered include benign prostate disease, penis curvature, cystisis, kidney stones, pediatric urology, prostate, sexual dysfunction, urinary tract infections (UTI), and urological cancers.

Why not surgery instead of long term antibiotics

by Denzel, Nov 05, 2004 12:00AM
My 7 month old daughter has recently being diagnosed with urinary reflux of a grade 3-4 level.  This was discovered after a bad UTI high fevers and a hospital admission for 4 days of IV antibiotics. She is now on oral bactrim until she is well toliet trained with the hope that this condition will right itself during this time.  I have some information that suggests that a grading of 3-5 may needed to be fixed by operating and reimplanting the ureters back into the bladder on an angle that prevents the urine from refluxing back up into the kidneys.



Would it not be better to have surgery initally and avoid the long term use of antibiotics?





I have some concern of the long term use of antibiotics and with this grading I am also concerned that she may need surgical intervention at the end of this time if the condition does not right itself anyway.  



Will she be resistant to this drug should she need it in years to come?  What about the affect on her teeth?  My paediatrican is in favour of the antibiotic approach and I would appreciate a second opinion.

Thank You

Denzel



by Kevin Pho, MD, Nov 06, 2004 12:00AM
Studies have shown roughly equal efficacy between surgical and medical therapy for urinary reflux.  However, surgery is normally considered in the following cases:



* The presence of gross reflux and ureteral dilatation in a young child (particularly if under two years of age) even without marked scarring, since new scars will develop in up to 60 percent of these cases.



* A child who becomes infected and shows new scars because of incomplete compliance with medical therapy.



* A family that elects surgery, because compliance with daily antimicrobial therapy is too difficult to achieve or adequate follow-up is difficult for geographic reasons.



You may want to inquire about another opinion (preferably at a tertiary care medical facility) to see if surgery is the better option.



Followup with your personal physician is essential.



This answer is not intended as and does not substitute for medical advice - the information presented is for patient education only. Please see your personal physician for further evaluation of your individual case.



Kevin, M.D.

Medical Weblog:

kevinmd_b



Bibliography:

Rose et al.  Diagnosis and treatment of vesicoureteral reflux and chronic pyelonephritis.  UptoDate, 2004.
Member Comments

by IJoeG, Nov 08, 2004 12:00AM
To: Pediatric Urology
0
Continue discussion
Expert Activity
Fluoroquinolones increase risk of t...
Jul 08 by Enoch Choi, MD
The role of coronary angioplasty an... 
Jul 06 by Lee Kirksey, MD
Heart Scan-Painless but not Harmles...
Jul 04 by Lee Kirksey, MD
Related Expert Forums