fretboard's Profile
Are you sure you want to delete this personal page?
Profile
Status:
...
About Me: Male, Sacramento, member since Feb 2008
"Defender of the truth"
I got the following article about who should ... [More] be treated for HepC off of the internet somewhere. All I can say is go ahead and read it. Use what you can and leave the rest for someone else. If you're thinking about going thru tx, my suggestion is to wait until you have learned as much as you can about HepC. You will want to know about blood work, research and clinical trials, stages and grades, fibrosis, cirrhosis and the liver in general and how it works. It may take you a year or two, if you haven't already done so get a complete liver panel blood tests. Make sure your doctor is well qualified to tx someone with HepC as you really don't want to be his first patient, trust me on this. My other suggestion prior to going thru tx is to wait until you are good and ready. Do not rush into tx because your husband or wife want you to rid yourself of this dreadful pain in the a$$ disease. Don't go thru HepC tx until you are good and ready for it. HepC tx can be really hard for some people, truly difficult for others and some people can not tolerate it at all. Sometimes the interferon is just too much. The idea is to go thru tx so you can live a better life. Lastly, do not rush into tx. More than likely you can live with your HepC for many years. Another reason to learn everything you can about HepC. Good Luck!!
Who Should Be Treated?
Patients with anti-HCV, HCV RNA, elevated serum aminotransferase levels, and evidence of chronic hepatitis on liver biopsy, and with
no contraindications, should be offered therapy with the combination of alpha interferon and ribavarin. The National Institutes of Health
Consensus Development Conference Panel recommended that therapy for hepatitis C be limited to those patients who have histological
evidence of progressive disease. Thus, the panel recommended that all patients with fibrosis or moderate to severe degrees of
inflammation and necrosis on liver biopsy should be treated and that patients with less severe histological disease be managed on an
individual basis. Patient selection should not be based on the presence or absence of symptoms, the mode of acquisition, the genotype of
HCV RNA, or serum HCV RNA levels. Patients with cirrhosis found through liver biopsy can be offered therapy if they do not have
signs of decompensation, such as ascites, persistent jaundice, wasting, variceal hemorrhage, or hepatic encephalopathy. However,
interferon and combination therapy have not been shown to improve survival or the ultimate outcome in patients with preexisting
cirrhosis.
Patients older than 60 years also should be managed on an individual basis, since the benefit of treatment in these patients has not been
well documented and side effects appear to be worse in older patients.
The role of interferon therapy in children with hepatitis C remains uncertain. Ribavirin has yet to be evaluated adequately in children,
and pediatric doses and safety have not been established. Thus, if children with hepatitis C are treated, monotherapy is recommended, and
ribavirin should not be used outside of controlled clinical trials.
In people with both HCV and HIV infection, benefits of therapy for hepatitis C have only recently been evaluated. The decision to
treat people co-infected with HIV must take into consideration the concurrent medications and medical conditions. If CD4 counts are
normal or minimally abnormal (> 400/mL), responses are similar in frequency to those in patients who are not infected with HIV. The
efficacy of combination therapy in HIV-infected people has been tested in only a small number of patients. Ribavirin may still have
significant interactions with other antiretroviral drugs.
In many of these indefinite situations, the indications for therapy should be reassessed at regular intervals. In view of the rapid
developments in hepatitis C today, better therapies may become available within the next few years, at which point expanded indications
for therapy would be appropriate.
In patients with clinically significant extrahepatic manifestations, such as cryoglobulinemia and glomerulonephritis, therapy with alpha
interferon can result in remission of the clinical symptoms and signs. However, relapse after stopping therapy is common. In some
patients, continual, long-term alpha interferon therapy can be used despite persistence of HCV RNA in serum if clinical symptoms and
signs resolve on therapy.
Who Should Not Be Treated?
Therapy is inadvisable outside of controlled trials for patients who have clinically decompensated cirrhosis because of hepatitis C,
normal aminotransferase levels, a kidney, liver, heart, or other solid-organ transplant, specific contraindications to either monotherapy or
combination therapy. Contraindications to alpha interferon therapy include severe depression or other neuropsychiatric syndromes, active
substance or alcohol abuse, autoimmune disease (such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus erythematosus, or psoriasis) that is not well
controlled, bone marrow compromise, and inability to practice birth control. Contraindications to ribavirin and thus combination therapy
include marked anemia, renal dysfunction, and coronary artery or cerebrovascular disease, and, again, inability to practice birth control.
Alpha interferon has multiple neuropsychiatric effects. Prolonged therapy can cause marked irritability, anxiety, personality changes,
depression, and even suicide or acute psychosis. Patients particularly susceptible to these side effects are those with (Continued p. 9)(Continued from page 3 – Chronic Hepatitis C: Current Disease Management)
preexisting serious psychiatric conditions and patients with neurological disease.
Strict abstinence from alcohol is recommended during therapy with interferon. Interferon therapy can be associated with relapse in
people with a previous history of drug or alcohol abuse. Therefore, alpha interferon should be given with caution to a patient who has
only recently stopped alcohol or substance abuse. Typically a 6-month abstinence is recommended before starting therapy. Patients
with continuing problems of alcohol or substance abuse should only be treated in collaboration with alcohol or substance abuse
specialists or councilors. Patients can be successfully treated while on methadone.
Alpha Interferon therapy an induce autoantibodies, and a 6-12 month course triggers an autoimmune condition in about 2 percent of
patients, particularly if they have an underlying susceptibility to autoimmunity (high titers of antinuclear or antithyroid antibodies, for
instance). Exacerbation of a known autoimmune disease (such as rheumatoid arthritis or psoriasis) occurs commonly during interferon
therapy.
Alpha interferon has bone marrow suppressive effects. Therefore, patients with bone marrow compromise or cytopenias, such as
low platelet count (< 75,000 cells/mm3) or neutropenia ( 80% will get some long term symptoms or liver damage over a period of 10-40 years.
Out of all people who develop some liver disease> About 20% will develop cirrhosis after 20-30 years of being HepC positive>
Out of all people with Cirrhosis> 25% of those ppl with cirrhosis> may have liver failure or cancer.
Stable> The remaining 75% infected with HepC and have progressed over to Cirrhosis> This 75% will remain stable with cirrhosis over 5-10 years.
The above statistics were taken from the CDC website and Hepatitis C- An Australian Perspective, from a pamphlet I got at Harm Reduction Services in Sacramento on 11/21/10, yes it's that current. Statistics are very informative but we really have no idea what percentage we fall in, something to think about. If you're healthy and ready to tx go for it, you never know how you will feel until you push down on that plunger. good luck & GOD BLESS
We're all a little broken down. We're all a little twisted. We're all less than we wanted to be. Some are here to learn and some are here to teach. Unfortunately some are dying to treat, literally. Be sure to be your best on these pages, no matter what...
I came across a case study. One that went as far as it could.
Case Study 1
This case is used to be an example of excellent treatment. It is an historical case. It is not updated.
"Grand Rounds: A 32-Year-Old Woman With Fever and Flank Pain"
Ellen Sue Sossner Kaufman, RN, BSN, CCRN
[Clinician Reviews 7(9):204-208, 210-211, 1997. © 1997 Clinicians Publishing Group and Williams
& Wilkins.]
A 32-year-old white female was referred to a hepatologist for a liver biopsy following presentation to an emergency department (ED) where she had complained of fever and flank pain secondary to pyelonephritis from obstructive renal calculi. Past history was remarkable for a needle stick injury (the patient was a registered critical care nurse), sustained 10 years earlier in 1982 from a patient believed to be infected with non-A, non-B hepatitis. Six weeks subsequent to the needle stick, she became ill with a mild flu-like syndrome. She was not icteric and no laboratory tests were obtained. Routine physical exams following this exposure revealed sporadic elevations in liver function tests (LFTs). No further workup was obtained until her visit to the ED.
On physical exam in the ED, the patient was found to be well developed, well nourished, and in no acute distress. She was anicteric. Lymph nodes were negative, chest was clear to auscultation, and there was no hepatosplenomegaly.
No spider angioma or palmar erythema was present, and there was no edema of the extremities. The patient was very active and did not complain of fatigue or malaise. There was no evidence or history of decompensated liver disease or cirrhosis.
At the ED visit, laboratory values revealed a markedly elevated white blood cell count. Urinalysis was positive for blood, white blood cells, and bacteria.
Liver function tests were abnormal, with an aspartate aminotransferase (AST) of 48 U/L and an alanine aminotransferase (ALT) of 60 U/L. In light of these elevated LFTs, a complete hepatitis profile was obtained. The patient was found to be hepatitis C (HCV) antibody positive. She subsequently tested positive for HCV by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
The patient was referred to a hepatologist who procured a percutaneous liver biopsy to establish baseline liver condition. Interferon alpha (IFN) therapy was initiated after careful consideration of side effects versus possible benefits. The patient began a drug regimen of 3 million international units (MIU) administered subcutaneously three times a week.
A decrease in LFTs was noted after 4 weeks of therapy. Liver function tests continued to decline and were normalized by week 8. The IFN was well tolerated except for complaints of fatigue and headache. After 26 weeks of drug therapy, the patient tested negative for the presence of serum HCV via PCR. At that time, the IFN dosage was reduced to 1.5 MIU three times per week. Liver function tests remained normal for eight more weeks, when they increased markedly. A new serum HCV test was positive, and the IFN dosage was increased to 3 MIU three times per week. Though LFTs returned to normal, side effects worsened, with hair thinning and mood swings compounding the chronic headache and fatigue. Drug therapy was discontinued at the patient's request because of the worsening side effects. Following discontinuation of IFN therapy, LFTs showed a rebound effect, reaching new highs (see Figure 1).
The patient remained off IFN therapy for 16 months. After reading about several new treatment modalities, the patient expressed interest in undergoing the IFN protocol in the Reichard study,[1] which documented a positive response from prolonged IFN therapy. With the guidance of a hepatologist, the patient began the new protocol of 3 MIU three times weekly for 52 weeks.
After 4 weeks of therapy LFTs normalized, and HCV was not detectable in the serum after 16 weeks of drug therapy (see Figure 2). Adverse reactions continued to be present but were better tolerated secondary to increased sleep, decreased stress, daily exercise, and a low-fat diet. Flu-like syndrome and hair thinning were the primary complaints.
Starting at week 60, the IFN dosage was weaned in increments of one-half million units every 4 weeks (ie, 2.5 MIU at week 60, 2.0 MIU at week 64, 1.5 MIU at week 68). At 1.5 MIU, the patient reverted to a seropositive state and all therapies were ceased as reevaluation was deemed necessary. Since the patient was asymptomatic with minimal liver damage, a decision was reached between the patient and her physician to discontinue any further IFN treatment. Liver function tests and HCV RNA by PCR continue to be monitored every 4 to 6 months to follow any progression or worsening of the disease. Currently the patient remains asymptomatic with no apparent worsening of her liver function. She leads an active life.
Discussion
Infection with HCV poses a significant public health problem. This disease is a major cause of acute and chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis worldwide. It is estimated that an average of 150,000 people a year are diagnosed with HCV in the United States.[2] The prevalence is highly variable however, and the actual number of infected individuals is not known. Hepatitis C virus accounts for more than 90% of hepatitis cases attributable to percutaneous exposures,[2] thus the occupational risk for healthcare providers cannot be ignored. There is no vaccine currently available for HCV.
Hepatitis is a viral infection in which the hepatic cells necrose as a result of leukocytic-histiocytic reaction and infiltration.[3] The physical manifestations of viral hepatitis reflect liver cell damage resulting from the body's immune response to the virus, which in turn alters cellular function. The predominant mechanism for injury is thought to be direct hepatocytotoxicity,[4] though the exact mechanism by which this virus causes hepatitis is not known.
The pathogen itself is a positive, single-stranded RNA virus. It is enclosed in a lipid envelope containing approximately 10,000 nucleotides, which code for some 3,000 amino acids. The genomic organization of HCV is similar to that of the human flaviviruses known to cause yellow fever.[4] Like other RNA viruses, a DNA template is not required for replication.
Hepatitis C virus is spread via direct blood contact. Modes of transmission include needle-stick exposure, injecting-drug use, and transfusions. Other risk factors include body piercing, tattooing, and sharing razors, toothbrushes, and manicuring implements. There is, however, a population of HCV- positive individuals without any identifiable risk factors.
Diagnosis
Clinically, the majority of hepatitis patients remain asymptomatic, evading detection until the disease becomes chronic. Many cases are detected incidentally through blood donation, blood tests ordered as part of routine physical examinations, employment physicals, or insurance examinations. Typically, the physical examination is unremarkable.
Laboratory analysis in the form of LFTs can confound efforts to diagnose HCV. Obesity and alcohol as well as certain pharmacologic agents can lead to elevated transaminases. The HCV infection can also produce wide fluctuations in LFTs, ranging from normal to three to four times the normal range. This yo-yo phenomenon is a distinguishing characteristic of HCV infection; therefore, the patient must undergo serial testing for monitoring three to four times yearly throughout his or her lifetime.[2]
Hepatitis C can manifest as an acute or chronic infection, though most cases are chronic. The chronic form is further subdivided into chronic persistent and chronic active hepatitis. Chronic persistent infection is characterized by the continued presence of the virus following infection and is capable of causing a recurrence of the disease.[5] It is the more benign form of the two and rarely progresses.
The chronic active form manifests as ongoing hepatocellular damage and is believed to progress to cirrhosis in 20% to 50% of documented cases.[6] Treatment Treatment modalities for HCV have been mostly empiric. Recently, IFN has been used successfully to treat chronic HCV infection. The decision to institute therapy remains controversial, however. Many practitioners prefer the wait-and-see approach given the low risk of mortality, the high proportion of asymptomatic patients, the frequent adverse reactions to IFN therapy, and the considerable cost of the treatment. Others believe the strong association between HCV and cirrhosis justifies treatment in most cases.[7]
The use of IFN as a nonspecific antiviral agent was discovered more than 35 years ago by Isaacs and Lindermann. They observed that fluids from virus-infected cell cultures contained a cell-specified protein that could react with cells to render them resistant to infection by many viruses.[5] It has since been discovered that IFN profoundly affects vital cellular and bodily functions, including cell metabolism and growth, immunity, and tumors. Interferon is not a selective drug and therefore inhibits proliferation of normal cells as well as infected cells.[7]
Currently, recombinant IFN is the only treatment approved for chronic hepatitis C. It is thought to act by directly inhibiting the replication of hepatocytopathic HCV through multiple mechanisms, including inhibiting viral attachment and uncoating, inducing intracellular proteins and ribonucleases that convey antiviral properties to the cell, and amplifying both specific and nonspecific immune responses to viral antigens.[4] Interferon does not have a selective affinity for hepatocytes.
Adverse reactions are common among patients undergoing IFN therapy, with primarily flu-like symptoms seen in approximately 50% of all recipients. Other frequent side effects include depression, alopecia, and gastrointestinal distress.[8] The high probability of side effects plays an important role in the risk-versus-benefit analysis. The treatment protocol, based on a 1989 study by Davis et al,[9] is 3 MIU IFN administered subcutaneously three times weekly for 6 months, after which the dosage is reduced to 1.5 MIU for three more months. This protocol, which has been widely accepted and used worldwide, is the only dosing regimen approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of HCV. Approximately 50% of patients treated with IFN go into remission. Recurrence is common, affecting 70% to 80% of all patients within 6 to 12 months of discontinuing the conventional IFN-dosing regimen.[2] Response to the drug therapy is transient, and sustained remission is difficult to achieve.
The possibility of sustained remission occurring after a longer treatment regimen with IFN has been researched in two large-scale trials. In a Japanese study, more than 50% of 16 patients receiving 6 MIU for 52 weeks had a sustained response indicating that relapse was suppressed by prolonged IFN treatment. However, approximately 38% of the patients were resistant to prolonged IFN therapy.[10] A Scandinavian study by Reichard et al[1] of 30 patients treated for 60 weeks with 3 MIU three times weekly reported a sustained response in 60% of patients. Of those responding, 42% had a sustained response documented 24 weeks after treatment cessation. These studies support the conclusion that prolonged treatment with IFN induces a high percentage of sustained response, which coincides with cessation of viral replication.[1]
Conclusion
Hepatitis C virus accounts for more than 90% of all hepatitis cases attributable to percutaneous exposure, putting physician assistants and nurse practitioners at increased occupational risk of acquiring the disease. The majority of infected persons remain asymptomatic until the disease becomes chronic; at that point hepatocellular damage can occur, and in some cases, the disease may progress to cirrhosis. Currently, there is no vaccine available for HCV, and the decision to initiate therapy remains controversial.
The only FDA-approved treatment for HCV is long-term administration of IFN. However, the high probability of side effects and treatment cost must be considered when weighing the risks and benefits of therapy. In addition, disease recurrence is common and remission is difficult to achieve. However, the results of two recent studies suggest that prolonged IFN therapy may halt viral replication and induce a high percentage of sustained response in patients.
About the Author
Ellen Sue Sossner Kaufman is a staff nurse in the open heart unit at Weustoff Hospital in Rockledge, Fla. [Less]
I got the following article about who should ... [More] be treated for HepC off of the internet somewhere. All I can say is go ahead and read it. Use what you can and leave the rest for someone else. If you're thinking about going thru tx, my suggestion is to wait until you have learned as much as you can about HepC. You will want to know about blood work, research and clinical trials, stages and grades, fibrosis, cirrhosis and the liver in general and how it works. It may take you a year or two, if you haven't already done so get a complete liver panel blood tests. Make sure your doctor is well qualified to tx someone with HepC as you really don't want to be his first patient, trust me on this. My other suggestion prior to going thru tx is to wait until you are good and ready. Do not rush into tx because your husband or wife want you to rid yourself of this dreadful pain in the a$$ disease. Don't go thru HepC tx until you are good and ready for it. HepC tx can be really hard for some people, truly difficult for others and some people can not tolerate it at all. Sometimes the interferon is just too much. The idea is to go thru tx so you can live a better life. Lastly, do not rush into tx. More than likely you can live with your HepC for many years. Another reason to learn everything you can about HepC. Good Luck!!
Who Should Be Treated?
Patients with anti-HCV, HCV RNA, elevated serum aminotransferase levels, and evidence of chronic hepatitis on liver biopsy, and with
no contraindications, should be offered therapy with the combination of alpha interferon and ribavarin. The National Institutes of Health
Consensus Development Conference Panel recommended that therapy for hepatitis C be limited to those patients who have histological
evidence of progressive disease. Thus, the panel recommended that all patients with fibrosis or moderate to severe degrees of
inflammation and necrosis on liver biopsy should be treated and that patients with less severe histological disease be managed on an
individual basis. Patient selection should not be based on the presence or absence of symptoms, the mode of acquisition, the genotype of
HCV RNA, or serum HCV RNA levels. Patients with cirrhosis found through liver biopsy can be offered therapy if they do not have
signs of decompensation, such as ascites, persistent jaundice, wasting, variceal hemorrhage, or hepatic encephalopathy. However,
interferon and combination therapy have not been shown to improve survival or the ultimate outcome in patients with preexisting
cirrhosis.
Patients older than 60 years also should be managed on an individual basis, since the benefit of treatment in these patients has not been
well documented and side effects appear to be worse in older patients.
The role of interferon therapy in children with hepatitis C remains uncertain. Ribavirin has yet to be evaluated adequately in children,
and pediatric doses and safety have not been established. Thus, if children with hepatitis C are treated, monotherapy is recommended, and
ribavirin should not be used outside of controlled clinical trials.
In people with both HCV and HIV infection, benefits of therapy for hepatitis C have only recently been evaluated. The decision to
treat people co-infected with HIV must take into consideration the concurrent medications and medical conditions. If CD4 counts are
normal or minimally abnormal (> 400/mL), responses are similar in frequency to those in patients who are not infected with HIV. The
efficacy of combination therapy in HIV-infected people has been tested in only a small number of patients. Ribavirin may still have
significant interactions with other antiretroviral drugs.
In many of these indefinite situations, the indications for therapy should be reassessed at regular intervals. In view of the rapid
developments in hepatitis C today, better therapies may become available within the next few years, at which point expanded indications
for therapy would be appropriate.
In patients with clinically significant extrahepatic manifestations, such as cryoglobulinemia and glomerulonephritis, therapy with alpha
interferon can result in remission of the clinical symptoms and signs. However, relapse after stopping therapy is common. In some
patients, continual, long-term alpha interferon therapy can be used despite persistence of HCV RNA in serum if clinical symptoms and
signs resolve on therapy.
Who Should Not Be Treated?
Therapy is inadvisable outside of controlled trials for patients who have clinically decompensated cirrhosis because of hepatitis C,
normal aminotransferase levels, a kidney, liver, heart, or other solid-organ transplant, specific contraindications to either monotherapy or
combination therapy. Contraindications to alpha interferon therapy include severe depression or other neuropsychiatric syndromes, active
substance or alcohol abuse, autoimmune disease (such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus erythematosus, or psoriasis) that is not well
controlled, bone marrow compromise, and inability to practice birth control. Contraindications to ribavirin and thus combination therapy
include marked anemia, renal dysfunction, and coronary artery or cerebrovascular disease, and, again, inability to practice birth control.
Alpha interferon has multiple neuropsychiatric effects. Prolonged therapy can cause marked irritability, anxiety, personality changes,
depression, and even suicide or acute psychosis. Patients particularly susceptible to these side effects are those with (Continued p. 9)(Continued from page 3 – Chronic Hepatitis C: Current Disease Management)
preexisting serious psychiatric conditions and patients with neurological disease.
Strict abstinence from alcohol is recommended during therapy with interferon. Interferon therapy can be associated with relapse in
people with a previous history of drug or alcohol abuse. Therefore, alpha interferon should be given with caution to a patient who has
only recently stopped alcohol or substance abuse. Typically a 6-month abstinence is recommended before starting therapy. Patients
with continuing problems of alcohol or substance abuse should only be treated in collaboration with alcohol or substance abuse
specialists or councilors. Patients can be successfully treated while on methadone.
Alpha Interferon therapy an induce autoantibodies, and a 6-12 month course triggers an autoimmune condition in about 2 percent of
patients, particularly if they have an underlying susceptibility to autoimmunity (high titers of antinuclear or antithyroid antibodies, for
instance). Exacerbation of a known autoimmune disease (such as rheumatoid arthritis or psoriasis) occurs commonly during interferon
therapy.
Alpha interferon has bone marrow suppressive effects. Therefore, patients with bone marrow compromise or cytopenias, such as
low platelet count (< 75,000 cells/mm3) or neutropenia ( 80% will get some long term symptoms or liver damage over a period of 10-40 years.
Out of all people who develop some liver disease> About 20% will develop cirrhosis after 20-30 years of being HepC positive>
Out of all people with Cirrhosis> 25% of those ppl with cirrhosis> may have liver failure or cancer.
Stable> The remaining 75% infected with HepC and have progressed over to Cirrhosis> This 75% will remain stable with cirrhosis over 5-10 years.
The above statistics were taken from the CDC website and Hepatitis C- An Australian Perspective, from a pamphlet I got at Harm Reduction Services in Sacramento on 11/21/10, yes it's that current. Statistics are very informative but we really have no idea what percentage we fall in, something to think about. If you're healthy and ready to tx go for it, you never know how you will feel until you push down on that plunger. good luck & GOD BLESS
We're all a little broken down. We're all a little twisted. We're all less than we wanted to be. Some are here to learn and some are here to teach. Unfortunately some are dying to treat, literally. Be sure to be your best on these pages, no matter what...
I came across a case study. One that went as far as it could.
Case Study 1
This case is used to be an example of excellent treatment. It is an historical case. It is not updated.
"Grand Rounds: A 32-Year-Old Woman With Fever and Flank Pain"
Ellen Sue Sossner Kaufman, RN, BSN, CCRN
[Clinician Reviews 7(9):204-208, 210-211, 1997. © 1997 Clinicians Publishing Group and Williams
& Wilkins.]
A 32-year-old white female was referred to a hepatologist for a liver biopsy following presentation to an emergency department (ED) where she had complained of fever and flank pain secondary to pyelonephritis from obstructive renal calculi. Past history was remarkable for a needle stick injury (the patient was a registered critical care nurse), sustained 10 years earlier in 1982 from a patient believed to be infected with non-A, non-B hepatitis. Six weeks subsequent to the needle stick, she became ill with a mild flu-like syndrome. She was not icteric and no laboratory tests were obtained. Routine physical exams following this exposure revealed sporadic elevations in liver function tests (LFTs). No further workup was obtained until her visit to the ED.
On physical exam in the ED, the patient was found to be well developed, well nourished, and in no acute distress. She was anicteric. Lymph nodes were negative, chest was clear to auscultation, and there was no hepatosplenomegaly.
No spider angioma or palmar erythema was present, and there was no edema of the extremities. The patient was very active and did not complain of fatigue or malaise. There was no evidence or history of decompensated liver disease or cirrhosis.
At the ED visit, laboratory values revealed a markedly elevated white blood cell count. Urinalysis was positive for blood, white blood cells, and bacteria.
Liver function tests were abnormal, with an aspartate aminotransferase (AST) of 48 U/L and an alanine aminotransferase (ALT) of 60 U/L. In light of these elevated LFTs, a complete hepatitis profile was obtained. The patient was found to be hepatitis C (HCV) antibody positive. She subsequently tested positive for HCV by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
The patient was referred to a hepatologist who procured a percutaneous liver biopsy to establish baseline liver condition. Interferon alpha (IFN) therapy was initiated after careful consideration of side effects versus possible benefits. The patient began a drug regimen of 3 million international units (MIU) administered subcutaneously three times a week.
A decrease in LFTs was noted after 4 weeks of therapy. Liver function tests continued to decline and were normalized by week 8. The IFN was well tolerated except for complaints of fatigue and headache. After 26 weeks of drug therapy, the patient tested negative for the presence of serum HCV via PCR. At that time, the IFN dosage was reduced to 1.5 MIU three times per week. Liver function tests remained normal for eight more weeks, when they increased markedly. A new serum HCV test was positive, and the IFN dosage was increased to 3 MIU three times per week. Though LFTs returned to normal, side effects worsened, with hair thinning and mood swings compounding the chronic headache and fatigue. Drug therapy was discontinued at the patient's request because of the worsening side effects. Following discontinuation of IFN therapy, LFTs showed a rebound effect, reaching new highs (see Figure 1).
The patient remained off IFN therapy for 16 months. After reading about several new treatment modalities, the patient expressed interest in undergoing the IFN protocol in the Reichard study,[1] which documented a positive response from prolonged IFN therapy. With the guidance of a hepatologist, the patient began the new protocol of 3 MIU three times weekly for 52 weeks.
After 4 weeks of therapy LFTs normalized, and HCV was not detectable in the serum after 16 weeks of drug therapy (see Figure 2). Adverse reactions continued to be present but were better tolerated secondary to increased sleep, decreased stress, daily exercise, and a low-fat diet. Flu-like syndrome and hair thinning were the primary complaints.
Starting at week 60, the IFN dosage was weaned in increments of one-half million units every 4 weeks (ie, 2.5 MIU at week 60, 2.0 MIU at week 64, 1.5 MIU at week 68). At 1.5 MIU, the patient reverted to a seropositive state and all therapies were ceased as reevaluation was deemed necessary. Since the patient was asymptomatic with minimal liver damage, a decision was reached between the patient and her physician to discontinue any further IFN treatment. Liver function tests and HCV RNA by PCR continue to be monitored every 4 to 6 months to follow any progression or worsening of the disease. Currently the patient remains asymptomatic with no apparent worsening of her liver function. She leads an active life.
Discussion
Infection with HCV poses a significant public health problem. This disease is a major cause of acute and chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis worldwide. It is estimated that an average of 150,000 people a year are diagnosed with HCV in the United States.[2] The prevalence is highly variable however, and the actual number of infected individuals is not known. Hepatitis C virus accounts for more than 90% of hepatitis cases attributable to percutaneous exposures,[2] thus the occupational risk for healthcare providers cannot be ignored. There is no vaccine currently available for HCV.
Hepatitis is a viral infection in which the hepatic cells necrose as a result of leukocytic-histiocytic reaction and infiltration.[3] The physical manifestations of viral hepatitis reflect liver cell damage resulting from the body's immune response to the virus, which in turn alters cellular function. The predominant mechanism for injury is thought to be direct hepatocytotoxicity,[4] though the exact mechanism by which this virus causes hepatitis is not known.
The pathogen itself is a positive, single-stranded RNA virus. It is enclosed in a lipid envelope containing approximately 10,000 nucleotides, which code for some 3,000 amino acids. The genomic organization of HCV is similar to that of the human flaviviruses known to cause yellow fever.[4] Like other RNA viruses, a DNA template is not required for replication.
Hepatitis C virus is spread via direct blood contact. Modes of transmission include needle-stick exposure, injecting-drug use, and transfusions. Other risk factors include body piercing, tattooing, and sharing razors, toothbrushes, and manicuring implements. There is, however, a population of HCV- positive individuals without any identifiable risk factors.
Diagnosis
Clinically, the majority of hepatitis patients remain asymptomatic, evading detection until the disease becomes chronic. Many cases are detected incidentally through blood donation, blood tests ordered as part of routine physical examinations, employment physicals, or insurance examinations. Typically, the physical examination is unremarkable.
Laboratory analysis in the form of LFTs can confound efforts to diagnose HCV. Obesity and alcohol as well as certain pharmacologic agents can lead to elevated transaminases. The HCV infection can also produce wide fluctuations in LFTs, ranging from normal to three to four times the normal range. This yo-yo phenomenon is a distinguishing characteristic of HCV infection; therefore, the patient must undergo serial testing for monitoring three to four times yearly throughout his or her lifetime.[2]
Hepatitis C can manifest as an acute or chronic infection, though most cases are chronic. The chronic form is further subdivided into chronic persistent and chronic active hepatitis. Chronic persistent infection is characterized by the continued presence of the virus following infection and is capable of causing a recurrence of the disease.[5] It is the more benign form of the two and rarely progresses.
The chronic active form manifests as ongoing hepatocellular damage and is believed to progress to cirrhosis in 20% to 50% of documented cases.[6] Treatment Treatment modalities for HCV have been mostly empiric. Recently, IFN has been used successfully to treat chronic HCV infection. The decision to institute therapy remains controversial, however. Many practitioners prefer the wait-and-see approach given the low risk of mortality, the high proportion of asymptomatic patients, the frequent adverse reactions to IFN therapy, and the considerable cost of the treatment. Others believe the strong association between HCV and cirrhosis justifies treatment in most cases.[7]
The use of IFN as a nonspecific antiviral agent was discovered more than 35 years ago by Isaacs and Lindermann. They observed that fluids from virus-infected cell cultures contained a cell-specified protein that could react with cells to render them resistant to infection by many viruses.[5] It has since been discovered that IFN profoundly affects vital cellular and bodily functions, including cell metabolism and growth, immunity, and tumors. Interferon is not a selective drug and therefore inhibits proliferation of normal cells as well as infected cells.[7]
Currently, recombinant IFN is the only treatment approved for chronic hepatitis C. It is thought to act by directly inhibiting the replication of hepatocytopathic HCV through multiple mechanisms, including inhibiting viral attachment and uncoating, inducing intracellular proteins and ribonucleases that convey antiviral properties to the cell, and amplifying both specific and nonspecific immune responses to viral antigens.[4] Interferon does not have a selective affinity for hepatocytes.
Adverse reactions are common among patients undergoing IFN therapy, with primarily flu-like symptoms seen in approximately 50% of all recipients. Other frequent side effects include depression, alopecia, and gastrointestinal distress.[8] The high probability of side effects plays an important role in the risk-versus-benefit analysis. The treatment protocol, based on a 1989 study by Davis et al,[9] is 3 MIU IFN administered subcutaneously three times weekly for 6 months, after which the dosage is reduced to 1.5 MIU for three more months. This protocol, which has been widely accepted and used worldwide, is the only dosing regimen approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of HCV. Approximately 50% of patients treated with IFN go into remission. Recurrence is common, affecting 70% to 80% of all patients within 6 to 12 months of discontinuing the conventional IFN-dosing regimen.[2] Response to the drug therapy is transient, and sustained remission is difficult to achieve.
The possibility of sustained remission occurring after a longer treatment regimen with IFN has been researched in two large-scale trials. In a Japanese study, more than 50% of 16 patients receiving 6 MIU for 52 weeks had a sustained response indicating that relapse was suppressed by prolonged IFN treatment. However, approximately 38% of the patients were resistant to prolonged IFN therapy.[10] A Scandinavian study by Reichard et al[1] of 30 patients treated for 60 weeks with 3 MIU three times weekly reported a sustained response in 60% of patients. Of those responding, 42% had a sustained response documented 24 weeks after treatment cessation. These studies support the conclusion that prolonged treatment with IFN induces a high percentage of sustained response, which coincides with cessation of viral replication.[1]
Conclusion
Hepatitis C virus accounts for more than 90% of all hepatitis cases attributable to percutaneous exposure, putting physician assistants and nurse practitioners at increased occupational risk of acquiring the disease. The majority of infected persons remain asymptomatic until the disease becomes chronic; at that point hepatocellular damage can occur, and in some cases, the disease may progress to cirrhosis. Currently, there is no vaccine available for HCV, and the decision to initiate therapy remains controversial.
The only FDA-approved treatment for HCV is long-term administration of IFN. However, the high probability of side effects and treatment cost must be considered when weighing the risks and benefits of therapy. In addition, disease recurrence is common and remission is difficult to achieve. However, the results of two recent studies suggest that prolonged IFN therapy may halt viral replication and induce a high percentage of sustained response in patients.
About the Author
Ellen Sue Sossner Kaufman is a staff nurse in the open heart unit at Weustoff Hospital in Rockledge, Fla. [Less]
Interests:
Hepatitis C
Best Answers: 5Top Answerer:
Hepatitis
You haven't updated your status yet!
Hopefully things will start getting better for you! I'll pray for you as I know the power of praying has helped man...
Sending my prayers and wishes that all goes well whenever it happens. May the Gods of good health shower you and drown o...
Glad to see you're still posting on this forum and I hope your TIPS procedure helps you immensely. I'm a music...
I started tx on 11/13/08, fairly uneventful except for a short rush of sx,s in the evening. The bx that was done like on 10/27/08 showed zero stage and grade 2. What puz...
I'm hoping that this is the beginning of my tx journey. I really want to tx at the trial site as all staff are very positive and uplifting. With all the krapola I j...
Jul 07
Was thinking about you fretboard. Was diggin through a closet here at the house and stumbled on a vintage 1940's Kamaka soprano ukulele. Having a small 2" hairline crack on the face repaired by a local luthier (love that word).He was amazed at it's fine condition. Looks like I'll have a winter hobby this year! Hope all is well with you. Pro
Jun 04
Thanks for asking, I am doing well.
Life is good though the weather sure is crazy~
hugs from the bay.
02/12
Hey! I would sooooo do a commercial! We should sighn me up somehow!!!! LOL! As far as the youtube goes, I appreciate you asking me if you can post a hep C comment. I have told all of my family, and most of my friends, but not everyone in my life (like people from work and school). i actually posted the youtube link on my facebook, and I have 591 friends on there, and it's unbelievable, but I know each one of them, so I don't prefere to be open about hep C on facebook, since it's linked to my youtube.
How are you? I have 7 more injections left. Today is horrible, my lips are numb and I am dizzy, achey and nauseous here at work, but it's all good! It will pass shortly, each side efferct does.
No Trackers
No Tickers
About Us |
Advertising |
Terms of Use |
Privacy |
What's New |
En español |
Report Abuse |
Contact Us |
Help
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. Med Help International, Inc. is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.
This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.
Copyright © 1993-2012 Med Help. All rights reserved.
