No doctor, I am in no way blaming or nor have or would consider litiginous with the doctors who performed the surgeries. Actually, I am very thankful for the first surgery since it did achieve a high level of relief and I was back to my old self, up until a few months prior to the second surgery, when I was involved in an accident that spurred on the need for consideration of C3-C5. It is that there are other individuals who claim alternative type of surgery may have worked better the second time. Now all I have is time so that is how I found you and there are some many alternative treatments I am discovering, much like the one you discuss above in which you are involved. When I go to these other centers, some have suggested that the second surgery had a relatively high level of failure compared to the first surgery, or rather, of not solving the problem. So maybe that is a better way of putting it, is there any research or published opinions that discuss the success percentage of a second two level cervical fusion for the reduction of pain, possibly even vs. other treatment (though this part not that important).
I hopoe that the additional information is helpful and appreciate any direction you might be able to provide.
Dear Steve,
I sense that there is a litiginous flavor to your question. As such I can only tell you that cervical fusion is still regarded as standard of care in the US and many other countries.
Perhaps you should seek treatment at a multidisciplinary neurospine and pain center very much like the center that I come from. Such centers can be found I am sure in your region.