Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
 | 

How can pathology of tumor change?

by sweetnvmbr00, Oct 20, 2009 09:48AM
I am a 37 year old female.I had a prophylactic bi-lateral mastectomy in November 2007 after my identical twin sister was diagnosed with stage III invasive lobular carcinoma and we both tested positive for the BRCA1 mutation. In October 2008 while having final reconstrutive surgery the doctor removed a 5cm node in the upper axillary near peck and shoulder that came back positive for cancer. Since I have no breast tissue I was diagnosed metastatic tumor of unknown origin.
I received 4 AC and 4 Taxotere treatments and 28 radiation treatments to left reconstructed breast, axilla and coloar bone. After I was done with active treatment my oncologist said I was triple negative and therefor there was nothing else medically we could do. My receptor status was ER+(1%) PR-HER2-. I went to MD Anderson to get a second opinion and now I am being told that my pathology has changed an the tumor was ER+(70%) PR- HER2- by FISH. They want me to start Arimidex since I have no Ovary's. I don't understand how the pathology can change that much. I am waiting to hear back from the PA at MDA so she can sit down and go over the full report with me. Meanwhile I have picked up the script for the Arimidex but I am hesitating starting it until I speak with her. I have read Arimidex doesn't respond well if the tumor was PR-? Any thought on all of this would be greatly appreciated.
sweetnvmbr00
Member Comments (2)

by japdip, Oct 20, 2009 01:05PM
To: sweetnvmbr00
I don't think the Pathology of the tumor changed but when examined by different methods you can come up with different results. As far as the 1% / 70% .... any amount is considered Positive; no matter the percentage. When 1st and 2nd opinions are opposing you are entitled to a 3rd if you wish.. I would wait for the MDA report to be explained in detail though. Regards .....

by katarina777, Oct 21, 2009 06:02PM
I know the FISH is a much more accurate, and much more expensive test, especially in determining Her2 status.

I don't get the part about calling your cancer nonspecific since I would think that obviously it is bc, just as your twin siters.
Post Comment
To
Comment
Post Comment
Recent Activity
Karen99 commented on Who am I kidding?
4 hrs ago
Karen99 have I ever mentioned I'm tired?
healingwell62 did it!!!!! Had the DIEP and it went extremely well...
valliboy Is keeping her chin up. Had a great holiday with family a...
maybebaby29 commented on photo
Nov 23
lhughes signed up to Crew in Atlanta for the Komen 3Day next year!...
Karen99 commented on Helping Stray Cats, T...
Nov 18
NSK218 joined this community
Welcome them!
Nov 17
RSS Expert Activity
What You Don't Know About Breathing...
Nov 24 by Steven Y Park, MD
Thanksgiving
Nov 23 by Thomas Dock, Vet. Technician
Snoring As Your Internal Smoke Alar...
Nov 22 by Steven Y Park, MD
Community Members