I am a 53 year-old
womanWomen's way whose recent mammogram showed < 1cm mass in my left breast. Nothing appeared in the follow-up ultrasound. Upon meeting with a surgeon to discuss (and subsequently plan for) a biopsy I mentioned that I take an MAOI (
Nardil) and could not be administered Epenephrine during surgery. When the surgeon said he used Lydocaine, rather than Epenephrine, I realized he did not know about
Nardil's contraindications (as neither Lydocaine/Epenephrine are
safeSafe driving for teens
Safe sex for me). I cannot take anything that
clotsBlood clots blood.
I know I am stressed from the anticipation of a biopsy -- as it seems most of us are -- and also by a decision to put a few life decisions on hold until I have closure/can proceed with whatever follow-up up is required post-biopsy.
That being said, I'm very concerned about the surgeon's ignorance. I've successfully been awake for surgery with only local anesthetic in the past --
CarbocaineCarbocaine hcl, or some variation thereof -- and the procedures to which I'm referring were longer and more invasive than the biopsy is to be.
On one hand I believe doctors and patients need to educate each other; on the other, I believe I have the right to want a surgeon that I trust going into this procedure. I am so tired of defending myself for taking Nardil and being perceived as overracting when I'm merely "self-advocating."
Any advice here would sincerely be appreciated.
I am concerned that what for me is self-advocacy might be perceived as overactive.
It is a sad fact that many doctors will not listen closely to a patient who is advocating for him/herself. They will listen to someone who is licensed. And if it is presented in writing, you will at least have documentation of your concern.