Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
 | 

Breast cancer treatment options

by hapster1, Oct 31, 2006 12:00AM
Just got back from oncologist with wife. She had lumpectomy 2 weeks ago. Doctor recommended radiation and hormone therapy. She said chemo was up to my wife. She had a 1.1cm tumor removed with negative lymph nodes. She said at 1.5 she would push for chemo but at 1.1 left it up to us. Does this sound right? My wife is 54 and otherwise in good shape. Doctor did say that it was 2 to 3% better not to recur with chemo but only 2 to 3%. Is it worth going through chemo and its negative side effects for 2 to 3%?
Member Comments (6)

by Avidhiker, Nov 01, 2006 12:00AM
To: hapster1
I researched that same question until I was exhausted. Yes, unfortunately, it is only about a 3% decrease in the risk of recurrence.  My tumor was 2.4 with negative nodes.  I did chose to take chemo only after I had the ONCOtype DX test performed.  Genomic Labs in California is the only lab currently in the world that performs this genomic test that quantifies the risk of recurrence in node negative, ER+, early stage breast cancer.  It assigns a number 1-18 low; 19-30 intermediate; over 30 high. Most oncologists will let you skip the chemo if your percentage is 10 or under.  My number was 26 with a 16% chance of recurrence in ten years (taking into account that I will be on Tamoxifen).  If you are really into stats, this means that I reduced my risk from 16 to 13 because of chemo. I am also taking weekly infusions of Herceptin (my HER2 was overexpressed). This will further reduce recurrence by about 50% (50% of 13=6.5--6.5). In my opinion, you do whatever it takes to not have this rotten thing come back. You only want to go through this once.

I assume you know the results of the tumor markers, whether she is ER and PR+ or -, how aggressive the tumor was, whether she was HER2 overexpressed.

The Oncotype DX test is getting a lot of attention now.  In one year, their cases went from about 600 to 14,000.  It is becoming a tool for oncologists to help determine whether chemo will provide benefit.  One caveat:  Trials are now underway to determine whether those women who fall in the gray (intermediate) zone will benefit.  As you know, this taks about 5 years.  I was not in a position to wait.  Hopefully, my oncologist is right about the benefit outweighing the toxic side effects.

by hapster1, Nov 01, 2006 12:00AM
Thank you for your responce. Oncotype Dx test was not mentioned but we will be questioning the oncologist now. The doctor did say if she thought it was necessary(chemo) she certainly would recommend it but where tumor was 1.5 and negative nodes with clear margin she left it up to my wife. Looks like more research before final decision. Once again thank-you for the insight.

by boninclyde, Nov 02, 2006 12:00AM
To: hapster1
I had right breast masectomy for wide spread calcifications, 0.09 invasive cancer, er+. PR+, HER2-, no lymph node involvement, oncotype test 20 1/2. I do not need chemo or radiation. I will now have to have tamoxifen or ovaries removed. By looking at her results and studying my on cancer it does not look like she would need chome. I am not a doctor. Go to breastcancer.org and look at info there.

by rkmsim, Nov 08, 2006 12:00AM
My second bc in 2003 had the same characteristics as your wife.  In 1998, my tumor was 2cm, 1 positive lymph node and I chose chemo as well as radiation.  In 2003, I had a new primary on the other side.  It was 1.1cm, negative nodes, ER+, PR+ and Her2Neu negative.  I decided not to have chemo based on the pathology and statistics despite the fact that 2 out of the 3 oncologists that I went to recommended chemo.  However, the important thing is that you make a decision based on the facts and ultimately what you feel most comfortable with.  You have to say to yourself - if the cancer comes back, will I say I should have had chemo.  If you know that in your mind you did what was right for you, then that is what is important.  I know that if I get bc again, I still feel that I made the right decision both times, in 1998 and 2003 based on the information I had.

by hapster1, Nov 09, 2006 12:00AM
Thanks to all for the responses. We just got back from the radiologist yesterday and my wife has decided to go with just the radiation and hormone therapy. Both radiologist and oncologist are very comfortable with that along with my wife. They tell us everything looks good and was caught very early. This was actually found by mistake. She was sent in for a breast mri which showed all was well but this 1.1cm on the other breast was picked up by the mri. Lucky us. She is comfortable with her decision and we are both going to be positive about this. Thank-you and good luck to all.

by Avidhiker, Nov 09, 2006 12:00AM
To: hapster1
Thanks for your well wishes and best of luck to your wife.  I am midway through radiation which is a piece of cake, a daily inconvenience.
Related discussions
Post Comment
To
Comment
Post Comment
Recent Activity
ginger899 commented on I have to watch what ...
1 hr ago
swampcritter commented on I have to watch what ...
1 hr ago
Ashelen commented on I have to watch what ...
1 hr ago
I have to watch what I say.
2 hrs ago by peekawho
peekawho is mostly over the flu.
Mood Tracker: I am so excited today.....
5 hrs ago by jasmine1988
jasmine1988 added the Mood Tracker
5 hrs ago
Heatherm4 commented on finally
9 hrs ago
RSS Expert Activity
Thanksgiving
7 hrs ago by Thomas Dock, Vet. Technician
Snoring As Your Internal Smoke Alar...
Nov 22 by Steven Y Park, MD
Raw Pet Food Diets: Common Sense
Nov 21 by Arnold L Goldman, D.V.M.
Community Members