Dear avidhiker: This is a very personal issue. Oncologists can present the facts (e.g. 3% risk reduction). We can tell you that most women tolerate chemotherapy quite well without major side effects. However, there are side effects and we cannot predict how any individual will respond. It really boils down to your personal assessment of whether chemotherapy is something you wish to pursue in light of the risk/benefit ratio. Good luck in your decision.
I'm only ONE personal story so keep that in mind. If your tumor was over 2 cm your risk is greater than mine.
From a 2002 HER2+++, ER+, PR+ 1.6 IDC who was 51 at the time... and has never had Herceptin, only the older standard of CAF (no dose dense), rads, and briefly, tamoxifen and then Arimidex...
IF (make that IF gigantic and bold) you have an onc who has enough of a grasp of honesty and any real comprehension of the likely loss of libido, plus weight gain, metabolism that goes to a crawl, chemobrain, blood counts that generally take years to get back to semi-normal, and joints that are painfully dry without estrogen... and who actually tells you that...
And IF you can spend some time talking to someone who has had recurrence or mets with or without having done chemo...
Then you can make a genuine choice. I was never given that courtesy. I haven't had recurrence or mets and sadly because of that I am expected to be grateful for the failure to be fully informed.
I was paid to work in the woods at the time treatment began and was in excellent shape, and it took YEARS to get back to where I could jump rope without stumbling constantly. I still weigh 18 pounds more than I did when I started treatment.
Did anyone explain yet to you that one side effect of years of hormonal treatment is drier everything, including ears, eyes, joints, and yes, vagina, and that for some of us no amount of lubrication will allow sex to be a pleasure?
A.A.