Aa
Aa
A
A
A
Close
Avatar universal

Hormone receptor negative

Is a woman with hormone receptor negative breast cancer more likely to have a recurrence just because of her HR status, or is she at a disadvantage simply because she cannot be treated with Tamoxifen or some other hormone related treatment?  In other words, is being receptor negative a bad thing in and of itself?
Thanks
2 Responses
Sort by: Helpful Oldest Newest
Avatar universal
Dear A husband:  The most important consideration is that Tamoxifen of other hormone-related treatment will not be helpful.  That said, hormone receptor negative tumors appear to be more aggressive.  It is difficult, however, to say that this is the only variable, since there are so many other factors that contribute to the behavior of tumors - including size, lymph node involvement, and Her2neu status to name a few.
Helpful - 0
Avatar universal
In general, receptor negative tumors are felt to behave a bit more aggressively than hormone positive ones. So yes, there's more to it than just not being amenable to hormone therapy. But there are other factors which affect prognosis more significantly; namely, tumor size, lymph node status, etc.
Helpful - 0

You are reading content posted in the Breast Cancer Forum

Popular Resources
A quick primer on the different ways breast cancer can be treated.
Diet and digestion have more to do with cancer prevention than you may realize
From mammograms to personal hygiene, learn the truth about these deadly breast cancer rumors.
A list of national and international resources and hotlines to help connect you to needed health and medical services.
Herpes sores blister, then burst, scab and heal.
Herpes spreads by oral, vaginal and anal sex.