Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum. ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
Core biopsies are quite accurate if the proper area is sampled. Needle biopsies can miss the specific area of suspiscion as such a small sample is taken. i'm not sure why you think that the testing on the lump after removal will be any different than the core biopsy done before removal. I suppose you could have had the lump removed in the very beginning or at least after the needle biopsy if you wished or the Surgeon thought it was necessary. Actually you only have to go thru as many tests as you agree to and I don't think you are going to develop breast cancer from worrying about the Path report on the lump.If the lump in 2001 was some type of cyst it could have been removed then and it's highly possible that it has refilled with fluid over the years. It sounds like you might be stressing out due to your Mother's experience as much as your own at this point. Regards ....