After a mammo in May 04, I was told I had calcifications. Yesterday, I was told I needed to have a biopsy. The radiologist showed me the magnified mammo, using an addition 2 magnifying glasses. There are microcalcifications (5) scattered throughout my left breast. Why biopsy? There are no
clustersCluster headaches. She told my gyn that the results are inconclusive and recommended biopsy. She said that I "appear" to have more that I did in March 03. After reading the forum, I'm confused. Why biopsy and what? I'm 45 years old and have a history of breast cancer in the
familyBirth control and family planning
Choosing a primary care provider
Ewing’s sarcoma
Family troubles - resources. My aunt was 79 when diagnosed and my mother had her left breast removed at 74 due to calcifications, which were not cancerous...yet. She has received no further treatment of any kind. Thanks for you thoughts on this.
After a needle biopsy failed to produce a positive result, there was talk of precancer, but the clusters looked too suspicious to ignore, and an open excisional biopsy with removal of the two most suspicious clusters, showed them to be cancerous and microinvasional, whatever that means.
I just had the lumpectomy and lymph node surgery, and will be results on that in 5 days. If no sign of spreading is seen, I'll undergo radiation therapy, regarless.
So, my comment is that just because there is no tumor, and they are called microcalcifications, if a biopsy is recommended, please get one. You may just catch an early cancer before it spreads too far.