Dear jordanna, The sample reported on above is benign - no malignancy (no cancer or pre-cancer). The decision about whether to pursue further tissue sample of the lesion, by removing the entire lesion, is based on such factors as the size of the lesion, and the comfort that what has been obtained is an adequate sample. If you feel you have had good explanations about how both of the specialists have arrived at their respective opinions and are still uncertain about which opinion to follow, then a third opinion from a breast specialist as a tie breaker is always an option.
This is where it comes down to playing odds, I suppose: the basic question is to what extent it's possible, with your report, that there is something else there. It would be easy if it had been found that the calcifications were associated with a totally bland process, such as fibrocystic change; or, on the other hand, if along with the florid hyperplasia, there was "atypia." In the first examle, it would be quite definite that no further surgery was needed; and in the other case, it would be clear that there was a significant possibility that cancer could also be there. In your case, florid hyperplasia means extra growth going on in the ducts, which is to some degree a risk factor for breast cancer (not huge, but measurable) but not having "atypia," which means changes not only in growth but in cell characteristics that are of more concern, the chance of finding adjacent cancer is very low. But it's not absolutely zero. Since there's no way to know for sure, but since the chances are very great it's ok, it comes down to deciding whether it would make you feel better to go ahead now and be sure, recognizing it's highly likely the surgery will show nothing more, or to follow along with serial exams and mammograms carefully -- which, in my opinion, would be every six months for at least a couple of years.
Thank you to both CCF-FN, MSN-JS and C2 Surgeon. My gut instincts and research are in line with yours. While it might make me feel better to go in now and know for sure (even though the odds are that it is beign), I do have a concern that by going in the result would scar tissue which might make future mammograms harder to read. Also, it is my understanding the conditions found (micro calcifications, hyperplasia, radial scar) frequently continue/repeat, and I don't want to get into a cycle of biopsies/excision each time, with no peace of mind or body.
By the way, Thank you and God Bless you. I have felt that I could depend upon your forum sometimes more than my own physicians. Please expect a donation from me in the next few days. What a gift you provide. What a tribute to healing and help.
With sincere appreciation and respect,
J