Aa
Aa
A
A
A
Close
Avatar universal

Scheduled for Surgical Biopsy

I am scheduled for a surgical biopsy in two days, but am feeling somewhat nervous about the procedure and whether or not I should get a second opinion first.  I had a mammogram (spot compression) two weeks ago that showed a "spiculated" mass 2.5 cm. also visible on ultrasound. Core Biopsy revealed atypical epithelial hyperplasia and intraductal pappilomas.  

Doctor indicated that there is a less than 5% chance that there is cancer; however, it is neccesary to make sure. I also found a small (tiny) lump in an area away from the mass that is seen on mammogram/ultrasound (the 2.5 cm. area is not palpable).  A year ago I found a lump that felt like a small marble that, after biopsy, was determined to be benign (not seen on mammogram, as far as I know).

The doctor will biopsy the 2.5 cm. area and has given me the option of taking a biopsy of the new lump, although he believes that it is nothing and does not feel it is neccesary.  I am afraid to just ignore it.  

Am I doing the right thing in having the surgical biopsy?  Should I worry?  Should I ignore the new lump?
9 Responses
Sort by: Helpful Oldest Newest
Avatar universal
It is always better to be "safe"  than "sorry".  I didn't push the issue with my doctors back in 2001, when I found a lump in my chest and they insisted it was a cyst.  Nine months later, the lump much larger, I am sent to a surgeon who rushed me in for surgery.  Five days later I got the results which was invasive ductal carcinoma, 2.5 x 2.7 cms and very agressive.  The lump was the size of a pea when I first found it.  I was angry at myself for not trusting my instincts that it could be more than just a cyst.  If you get it taken out and it is nothing, yipee, at least you will know and if you get it out and it is something serious (which I hope and pray it isn't) you will be glad you had it removed now.  So either way, it is in your best interest to get it removed and tested.  Not trying to scare you, but just for you to be aware.  Wish you all the best.  I will have 6 years cancer free this year!!
Helpful - 1
Avatar universal
I decided to take matters into my own hands and called Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston.  I brought my information, reports and films into them on Tuesday and I am scheduled for my biopsy next Thursday.  I feel like someone is now paying attention to my situation and it has made me feel so much better.  Thank you for all your advice.
Helpful - 0
Avatar universal
Good for you. I hope all turns out well for you. Keep us posted.
Helpful - 0
Avatar universal
Usually they do try to schedule biopsies within a couple of weeks. If it bothers you to wait so long you might want to check in to having it done at a different place. I've had to put off biopsies for a month due to scheduling conflicts. Each time my surgeon was ok with that, as long as I scheduled the biopsy relatively soon. Each time my biopsy was benign. If the surgeon felt my suspicious areas were highly suggestive of cancer he would have pushed for a biopsy sooner.
Helpful - 0
Avatar universal
When my Ultrasound showed that the lump I had in my chest was not a cyst I was rushed into surgery to have it removed right away.  I can't imagine having to wait a month.  However; I knew my lump was there 9 months earlier and two different physicians said it was a cyst, and maybe that was the reason for rushing.  Either way, I understand how you feel.  Hope everything turns out ok for you.
Helpful - 0
Avatar universal
I had an ultrasound and diagnostic mammogram on Feb 12 and was told that I needed to have a biopsy done.  After waiting a week to hear from my gyn I called them to see if an appointment had been made.  I was told they didn't have the report yet and would have to get it and call me back.  When they called back they left a message telling me my biopsy was scheduled for March 20th, more than a month from now. I don't know of anyone who has waited that long for a biopsy.  Is this normal? This week has seemed so long.
Helpful - 0
242527 tn?1292449140
MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL
Dear confuseddv:  Although a core biopsy can be a very good test, one of its limitations is that it takes a very small sample.  If there is any question that tissue near the sample could possibly be different or
Helpful - 0
25201 tn?1255580836
I would certainly go ahead with the biopsy. If you feel a second opinion would put your mind at ease then by all means postpoone the bx and proceed that way. I wouldn't just ignore the situation; it's much better to know for sure. Your surgeon shouldn't mind in the least if you request a second opinion. Good Luck ...
Helpful - 0
Avatar universal
I agree with jadip on having the biopsy. As for the lump, I would either have it biopsied or keep a close eye on it, which usually means returning in 4-6 months for a mammo and performing self-breast exams. A second opinion may help you better decide what to do. This is just my personal opinion after having several biopsies and now close monitoring.
Helpful - 0

You are reading content posted in the Breast Cancer Forum

Popular Resources
A quick primer on the different ways breast cancer can be treated.
Diet and digestion have more to do with cancer prevention than you may realize
From mammograms to personal hygiene, learn the truth about these deadly breast cancer rumors.
A list of national and international resources and hotlines to help connect you to needed health and medical services.
Herpes sores blister, then burst, scab and heal.
Herpes spreads by oral, vaginal and anal sex.