It is always better to be "safe" than "sorry". I didn't push the issue with my doctors back in 2001, when I found a lump in my chest and they insisted it was a cyst. Nine months later, the lump much larger, I am sent to a surgeon who rushed me in for surgery. Five days later I got the results which was invasive ductal carcinoma, 2.5 x 2.7 cms and very agressive. The lump was the size of a pea when I first found it. I was angry at myself for not trusting my instincts that it could be more than just a cyst. If you get it taken out and it is nothing, yipee, at least you will know and if you get it out and it is something serious (which I hope and pray it isn't) you will be glad you had it removed now. So either way, it is in your best interest to get it removed and tested. Not trying to scare you, but just for you to be aware. Wish you all the best. I will have 6 years cancer free this year!!
I decided to take matters into my own hands and called Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston. I brought my information, reports and films into them on Tuesday and I am scheduled for my biopsy next Thursday. I feel like someone is now paying attention to my situation and it has made me feel so much better. Thank you for all your advice.
Good for you. I hope all turns out well for you. Keep us posted.
Usually they do try to schedule biopsies within a couple of weeks. If it bothers you to wait so long you might want to check in to having it done at a different place. I've had to put off biopsies for a month due to scheduling conflicts. Each time my surgeon was ok with that, as long as I scheduled the biopsy relatively soon. Each time my biopsy was benign. If the surgeon felt my suspicious areas were highly suggestive of cancer he would have pushed for a biopsy sooner.
When my Ultrasound showed that the lump I had in my chest was not a cyst I was rushed into surgery to have it removed right away. I can't imagine having to wait a month. However; I knew my lump was there 9 months earlier and two different physicians said it was a cyst, and maybe that was the reason for rushing. Either way, I understand how you feel. Hope everything turns out ok for you.
I had an ultrasound and diagnostic mammogram on Feb 12 and was told that I needed to have a biopsy done. After waiting a week to hear from my gyn I called them to see if an appointment had been made. I was told they didn't have the report yet and would have to get it and call me back. When they called back they left a message telling me my biopsy was scheduled for March 20th, more than a month from now. I don't know of anyone who has waited that long for a biopsy. Is this normal? This week has seemed so long.
Dear confuseddv: Although a core biopsy can be a very good test, one of its limitations is that it takes a very small sample. If there is any question that tissue near the sample could possibly be different or
I would certainly go ahead with the biopsy. If you feel a second opinion would put your mind at ease then by all means postpoone the bx and proceed that way. I wouldn't just ignore the situation; it's much better to know for sure. Your surgeon shouldn't mind in the least if you request a second opinion. Good Luck ...
I agree with jadip on having the biopsy. As for the lump, I would either have it biopsied or keep a close eye on it, which usually means returning in 4-6 months for a mammo and performing self-breast exams. A second opinion may help you better decide what to do. This is just my personal opinion after having several biopsies and now close monitoring.