should I be worried. . . I am 46 yrs old and had hysterectomy at age 41. Been on Climara ever since. I had my regular mamogram a few weeks ago and after radiologist suggested u/s and then core biopsy. The pathology report came back as fibrocystic changes with adenosis but the radiologist felt the films were discordant with pathology and sent me to a breast surgeon. The surgeon declared that the lump in my breast was "worrisome" and scheduled me for surgical removal of entire lump with margins. I had surgery on Monday. Today, the surgeon's assistant called and said results were benign - she mentioned fibrocystic changes with some calcification but said everything was normal. Should I trust this? If the original findings of the pathologist was suspect to the radiologist, could this pathology report be wrong as well? I did have needle guided surgery, but could the wrong tissue have been removed? I meet with the surgeon net week but I don't know what to think. Did I just have unnecessary surgery, if the results of both pathology reports were the same?
One other note - the lump was near my chest wall and the surgeon did say it was a "tricky" one. What questions should I ask her when I meet for my follow up? Sorry to ask so many questions, but I just don't know what to believe.