Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
 | 

Wire Guided vs. Sterotactic Biopsy

by Kelley1968, Dec 07, 2007 05:17PM
I recently had my first mammogram and according to the radiology report I have 7-8 microcalcifications in the upper right quadrant of my right breast.  The radiologist has recommended a wire guided or excisional biopsy. Why is sterotactic not an option? Also,  it says bi-rad 4, suspicious for malignancy(low).  Is it because of where it's located? I don't see a surgeon until next Tuesday and would like to be prepared with questions. Thanks!
Member Comments (3)

by DrBhumikaMD, Dec 07, 2007 11:55PM
Hi,
You need to discuss this in detail with your radiologist and surgeon. If the microcalcifications are in a limited area you could even discus the option of a surgical excision biopsy so that the calcifications are removed and adequate tissue sample is got for a confirmed diagnosis. If however the microcalcifications are scattered then you will have to go ahead with the wire guided biopsy. A wire guided biopsy is done when the calcium specks are scattered and then localised using a wire and then a biopsy taken. You could discuss whether a stereotactic biopsy would be successful in taking a biopsy of the lesion, and your radiologist or surgeon will tell you if that is an option. Goodluck.

by Kelley1968, Dec 11, 2007 09:46PM
The surgeon (who is at a different facility from the radiologist), pretty much scoffed at the idea of a wire guided or excisional biopsy - said they don't do those there (it's a breast cancer center). He said with the stereotactic biopsy there is a 50% chance that they wouldn't be able to see the microcalcifications. Basically said I could wait six months and have another mammogram or have the stereotactic biopsy which may not be successful. He gave me options but seemed to lean toward waiting and watching. I don't feel comfortable because I'm getting two different opinions. I guess I'll be going to another surgeon for another opinion.

by DrBhumikaMD, Dec 12, 2007 03:10AM
Hi,
The difference in opinion between two specialists does put you in a fix at times. But that happens rarely. I suggest you should go ahead and follow on the surgeon's advice because of his having a clinical as well as radiological perspective of your case. He would know whats the best suited option for you right now. If he suggests a wait and watch policy, you can follow up after 6 months and get a repeat mammogram done. But if you still not convinced you can get a second opinion. Goodluck.
Related discussions
Post Comment
To
Comment
Post Comment
Recent Activity
Heatherm4 rain, rain...go away!! I have no idea what day I ovulate...
drifter0213 commented on turkey
1 hr ago
student_psychologist commented on turkey
2 hrs ago
LIZZIE LOU commented on turkey
3 hrs ago
turkey
3 hrs ago by drifter0213
turkey
3 hrs ago by drifter0213
turkey
3 hrs ago by drifter0213
turkey
3 hrs ago by drifter0213
RSS Expert Activity
What You Don't Know About Breathing...
Nov 24 by Steven Y Park, MD
Thanksgiving
Nov 23 by Thomas Dock, Vet. Technician
Snoring As Your Internal Smoke Alar...
Nov 22 by Steven Y Park, MD
Community Members