Breast Cancer Community
Wire Guided vs. Sterotactic Biopsy
About This Community:

This patient support community is for discussions relating to breast cancer, biopsy, genetics, chemotherapy, hormone therapy, lumps, lumpectomy, lymph node dissection, lymphedema, mammograms, mastectomy, radiation therapy, reconstruction, and self exams.

Font Size:
A
A
A
Background:
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank Blank

Wire Guided vs. Sterotactic Biopsy

I recently had my first mammogram and according to the radiology report I have 7-8 microcalcifications in the upper right quadrant of my right breast.  The radiologist has recommended a wire guided or excisional biopsy. Why is sterotactic not an option? Also,  it says bi-rad 4, suspicious for malignancy(low).  Is it because of where it's located? I don't see a surgeon until next Tuesday and would like to be prepared with questions. Thanks!
Related Discussions
3 Comments
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
Hi,
You need to discuss this in detail with your radiologist and surgeon. If the microcalcifications are in a limited area you could even discus the option of a surgical excision biopsy so that the calcifications are removed and adequate tissue sample is got for a confirmed diagnosis. If however the microcalcifications are scattered then you will have to go ahead with the wire guided biopsy. A wire guided biopsy is done when the calcium specks are scattered and then localised using a wire and then a biopsy taken. You could discuss whether a stereotactic biopsy would be successful in taking a biopsy of the lesion, and your radiologist or surgeon will tell you if that is an option. Goodluck.
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
The surgeon (who is at a different facility from the radiologist), pretty much scoffed at the idea of a wire guided or excisional biopsy - said they don't do those there (it's a breast cancer center). He said with the stereotactic biopsy there is a 50% chance that they wouldn't be able to see the microcalcifications. Basically said I could wait six months and have another mammogram or have the stereotactic biopsy which may not be successful. He gave me options but seemed to lean toward waiting and watching. I don't feel comfortable because I'm getting two different opinions. I guess I'll be going to another surgeon for another opinion.
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
Hi,
The difference in opinion between two specialists does put you in a fix at times. But that happens rarely. I suggest you should go ahead and follow on the surgeon's advice because of his having a clinical as well as radiological perspective of your case. He would know whats the best suited option for you right now. If he suggests a wait and watch policy, you can follow up after 6 months and get a repeat mammogram done. But if you still not convinced you can get a second opinion. Goodluck.
Blank
Continue discussion Blank
Go
Blank
Chemotherapy Tracker
Log symptoms & treatments
Start Tracking Now
MedHelp Health Answers
Top Breast Cancer Answerers
25201_tn?1255584436
Blank
japdip
587083_tn?1327123862
Blank
zouzi
962875_tn?1314213636
Blank
bluebutterfly2222
WV
Avatar_f_tn
Blank
ncmichigan
Willis, MI
Avatar_f_tn
Blank
Jaquta
4880072_tn?1364749626
Blank
Nylani
New Zealand
RSS Expert Activity
1741471_tn?1349564002
Blank
Parkinson Awareness Month: Parkinso... Blank
May 10 by Michael Gonzalez-WallaceBlank
233488_tn?1310696703
Blank
NEW STUDIES ON PREVENTING PROGRESSI...
May 08 by John C Hagan III, MD, FACS, FAAOBlank
2126606_tn?1346348724
Blank
Heroin Use in the U.S.
May 08 by Clare Waismann Kavin, Blank