I am a 55 year old, mother of five, whose mother is an almost 20 year survivor of post-menopausal BC. I recently had a mammogram that indicated a small (about 8) clumping of calcifications. These were new since my last mammogram two years ago. The radiologist recommended a biopsy and my surgeon agrees. While my surgeon said he does not think that the calcifications are worrisome, the biopsy should be done to be on the
safeSafe driving for teens
Safe sex side. I try to focus on his "not worrisome" comment but at the same time, I am very concerned. How are calcificationc classified? What percent are BC?
I had an abnormal mammo too. The radiologist rated it a BRAD4; I had an open biopsy and unfortunately my microclassification cluster was cancer. Micro and opposed to Macro are more suspicious. Statistically, my surgeon told me that 15% of the time it will be cancer. I had the bad luck. Hope yours turns out OK. Although this "club" has terrific members, I hope you are not inducted into it.
I am hoping that the biopsy will be early next week. But I cannot remember from my conversation with my doctor if he said that he wants to see me first or he will just schedule it. Too upset yesterday to remember half of what was said to me or what to ask. I should call his office, right? From what I have read it takes a few days to find out the results, correct? Dragging this out is torture, but I am not telling you all anyting that you don't already know.
I was reading some postings on a dite sponsored by Johns Hpkins in Baltimore and their turn around time for biopsy results is 24 hours. Why can they do that and others cannot?!?
The first time I had a report of clacifications (about 8 years ago), my surgeon said to wait six months and then check it out again. When I went back, all was well. This time he is recommending the biopsy, so I am on the edge. I have my appointment with him on Tuesday, just to go over the report and to set up the procedure. It seem slike that day is years away. I am not good at waiting for anything, let alone something like this. I went to the beach yesterday and had planned on staying the weekend. I ended up coming home last night. Right now, my home is the only place I want to be.
In the meantime, I am trying to keep busy around the house, painting trim, directing my kids with room cleanings, idiot stuff, but it keeps my mind busy.
Are you definite about not doing the next biopsy? I talked to my daughter this morning, who told me about her friend's aunt who has had 8 biopsies (all negative) done!!! My nerves would never stand up to the strain!
I am waiting for a response to my classification of clacification questions. They must not respond on the weekend.
Please know that you and everyone on this site are in my thoughts and prayers.
I got my report in the mail from the diagnostic center, that reported that my mammogram "showed an area of abnormality that requires further follow-up by your physician." Pretty vague, huh? No mention of calcifications. I do know that my ultrasound was clear, but then again, calcifications do not show up on an unltrasound, right? If I had any lump associated with this, would they have shown up?
I just came from my appointment w/the surgeon. There was a mix-up with the appointment, when I called frantic last week they tought I was coming in then and cancelled today's time. I had to wait around for them to fit me in. My mind immediately went to...oh no this is a bad sign. Just like the other day when I went to the beach to relax only to get a phone call from the Breast Cancer Coalition asking for a donatin because they were sure, "that I understood the importance of early detection!" I thought...is ths a cruel joke? How do you know about me?
Anyway, you are all so right about finding the best breast doctor/surgeon available! My Dr. has put me in a much better frame of mind, by going over the radiologist report with me, giving me a thorough physical exam, and going over every xray and pointing out all of the areas of concern and why he is not concerned with other areas. I have two groups of indeterminate calcifications that are microscopic, teeny tiny. One is in front of another and the deeper one is the one they are going after, because they cannot tell anything from the xrays. He told me that should it turn out to be BC it is so early and so small, it would be okay. No one wants to think that it will show BC, but just knowing that it is not the size of my head makes me okay.I feel so much better about everything (except for the two moles that he wants to biopsy at the same time!!!). My biopsy is scheduled for 12:30 tomorrow and I should have three of the five path reports by Friday. Please keep me in your thoughts and prayers as I keep all of you.
ziggy - In Jan. I had a stereotactic biopsy (also called Mammotome - I think some of the stereotactic machines are called Mammotomes, thus the name). They take tiny slivers of tissue. You're right, they don't get all of it. But they can take a number of samples. I asked my radiologist if he felt he got a good selection and he said he did. My surgeon told me stereotactic biopsies are about 97% accurate. I was extremely stiff and my arm was totally asleep after the biopsy. I thought that was the worst part. They make such a tiny incision (nick) and mine healed quickly.