Are diagnostic mammos the only way or prehaps the most precise way to view microcalcifications in areas of dense breast tissue?
Much is written about how
malignancyHyperpigmentation w/malignancy
Malignancy is most often associated with microcalcifications which are tightly clustered. Does this mean that microcalcifications that are seen as "not tightly clustered" are always
benignBenign ear cyst or tumor
Benign positional vertigo? Or could they be in the process of becoming clustered eventually..perhaps they are just being seen in early stages of clustering? Could cancer even be detected if they are not tightly clustered yet?
(I was recalled for diagnostic views last month due to microcalcifications which were
stableStable angina
Unstable angina last year (in an area of dense tissue) in the upper outer right breast. Diagnostic results were microcals are scattered and not tightly clustered but given the questionable increase in number from the prior exam, 6 month followup is recommended as a precautionary measure. Microcals did not appear suspicious. I'm just turning 43 and this is the second time microcalcs in this same area have raised questions. My physician has referred me to a breast surgeon but it's mainly for peace of mind at this point. I don't expect any bad news or even a biospy recommendation at this point but to have all questions answered from someone who works in the field on a
dailyDaily combo
Daily multiple for men 50+
Daily multiple for women
Daily multiple for women 50+
Daily multiple vitamins
Daily vite
Daily-vite men's formula
Daily-vite weight control basis is already giving me more peace of mind.