Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
 | 

microcalcifications

by damalgirl, Dec 31, 2007 02:55PM
Just three days ago got the diagnosis of microcalcifications in both breasts.  They are scattered with no mass effect.  This diagnosis is after a mammogram (my first) and an ultrasound.  The doctor ordered a MRI to look further.  This is all new . . . I've just done a little research on the internet.  But I am wondering why the MRI.  Why not another mammorgram with magnification or a biopsy?  

The doctor indicated that if the MRI is negative he will recommend short-term screening with a mammogram every six months.  

He also informed me about genetic counseling since my sister had breast cancer.  

So far, my main question is why the MRI?  

Member Comments (8)

by BhumikaMD, Dec 31, 2007 07:24PM
Hi,
You have not mentioned your age.
Well the mamogram (mammogram) and USG findings indicate microcalcifications in both breasts as you say. in certain conditions, for example dense breasts at less than 40-45 years of age the mammogram is not able to visualise the breast tissue clearly due to the dense breast tissue.
In such cases an MRI is used to pick upany lesion, also in certain cases the findings of MRI and mammogram are put together to see the region better.
A biopsy would have been difficult, as you say that the microcalcifications are scattered.
A mammogram is done first and then a MRI because an MRI is a more sensitive too to pick up lesions.
Hope this helps.
Good luck.

by Dennis MD, Dec 31, 2007 07:30PM
To: damalgirl
Hi.
Breast MRI can be used as a screening method for those women with high risk of breast cancer.  There are features of breast cancer that can be detected easily by MRI scan.  MRI can even be used to direct biopsy.
However, mammography is still the standard of care in breast cancer screening.
Hope that helped.

by damalgirl, Jan 01, 2008 01:53PM
To: BhumikaMD
Hi, thank you for your response.  I am 38 years old.  I have three children:  ages 6,4 and 3.  I breastfed them.  

My sister is going to get in touch with her doctor so that I can give the details of her cancer to my doctor--to see if there is any correlation.  Right now, it seems very different (from my limited understanding, of course).  I thank God my sister is doing well--she has been in remission for about 7 years.  

By the way, I am living in Jordan.  I have an excellent doctor, it seems.  I am thankful for him, and it seems that if the microcalcifications are a problem--it must be at a very early stage.

Thanks again.



by damalgirl, Jan 01, 2008 01:55PM
To: Dennis MD
Thank for your response.  I did not mention that I am in Jordan.  My doctor was trained in the U.S. and I feel is very compotent.  I am curious, partly, about any differences in procedures here compared to the U.S.

Thanks a lot.

by BhumikaMD, Jan 02, 2008 06:40AM
Hi,
So has the MRI been done? Do get back to us with the MRI findings and what your doctor has advised you.
With your age, it is sure that the MRI is to pick up lesions not visualised on mammogram due to the dense breasts.
Discuss everything with your doctor and schedule a regular follow up plan with him.
Good luck.

by Dennis MD, Jan 02, 2008 08:06AM
To: damalgirl
Hi.
There is probably not much difference in terms of the procedure that needs to be performed on a patient.  That is the reason why there is such a thing as standard of care.  There may be a difference though in the equipment that is to be used, or the technical staff that operates the equipment.  There are centers that can afford to buy the latest equipment, whereas there are centers that still use a less advanced equipment.
Please do give update on your MRI result.

by damalgirl, Jan 07, 2008 12:32PM
To: Dennis MD, BhumikaMD
Thank you for your helpful comments.  I had the MRI and a follow-up doctor's appointment just 2 days ago.  They found nothing significant on the MRI.  I am thankful!  It seems that the only reason they took care in this case is because of my sister having had BC.  The doctor wants me to do a mammogram every 9 months--just to keep a close eye on things.

Thank you again.  

by BhumikaMD, Jan 07, 2008 12:38PM
Hi,

That is great news!! Congratulations!!

Well, that is in fact the normal protocol of management.

Do ask the doctor for a copy of all the reports including the MRI.

You need to carry regular breast self exams - and report any abnormal features to your doctor.

Get a clinical examination done every 6-9 months and a repeat mammogram and ultrasound if required evry 9-12months, depending on your doctor's advice.

Do keep us posted about your health.
Good luck nad Best wishes.
Related discussions
Post Comment
To
Comment
Post Comment
Recent Activity
AHP84 commented on Tiger Woods and his m...
1 min ago
doctora commented on Tiger Woods and his m...
1 min ago
margypops commented on Tiger Woods and his m...
2 mins ago
peekawho commented on Tiger Woods and his m...
23 mins ago
Sunny59 definitely has chemo brain - I just remembered about this ...
mami1323 commented on Tiger Woods and his m...
40 mins ago
Sunny59 uploaded a new photo
47 mins ago
peekawho had a lovely massage, and is going nappy nappy time for a...
RSS Expert Activity
Prevention Gains Momentum: Your Gui... 
Nov 29 by Lee Kirksey, MD
What You Don't Know About Breathing...
Nov 24 by Steven Y Park, MD
Thanksgiving
Nov 23 by Thomas Dock, Vet. Technician
Community Members