Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
Breast Cancer  (Expert Forum)
 | 
the importance of Ki-67 marker
Answered by
Cleveland - OH
Questions posted in the Breast Cancer Forum are answered by medical professionals from The Cleveland Clinic. Topics include Breast Biopsy, Chemotherapy, Hormone Therapy, Lumps, Lumpectomy, Lymph node dissection, Lymphedema, Mammograms, Mastectomy, Radiation Therapy, Reconstruction, Self Breast Exam, and Surgery.

the importance of Ki-67 marker

by overseas, Nov 01, 2009 01:48PM
Tags: Ki
Hello. A young woman of 26 diagnosed with infiltrating ductal carcinoma, at least one lymph node involved. Biopsy Est.75%, Prog. 25-50%, HER2 score1 range 0-3; Ki-67 ~50% (score 3-4 range 1-4). Undergoing chemo AC+Taxol. tumor reacts well to chemo, lumpectomy and radiation will follow  Chemo+surgery+radiation all targeted to wipe out this tumor;  why is there such danger of development of metastases ?? THIS  tumor, if it already sent some microscopic cells (no traces found elsewhere in PET/CT) , if the tumor reacts well to chemo ,  shouldn't we assume that its possible wandering cells also die from the chemotherapy ???
Thank you.

by Cleveland Clinic, Nov 02, 2009 10:05AM
Dear overseas:  The concern is that this woman is extremely young to have developed a locally advanced (in the lymph nodes) cancer.  That there is lymph node involvement does increase the risk of recurrence.  The purpose of chemotherapy is to kill any and all wandering cells as you point out, however, this cannot be guaranteed.  We have no way of measuring this.  The comment on the genetic information is actually pertinent as carrying such a mutation would have potential implications for treatment and recurrence (new primary) rates.  
Member Comments (4)

by SueYoung55, Nov 01, 2009 05:36PM
The doctor will answer your questions but I wanted to suggest that this 26 yr old woman have BRCA 1 & 2 genetic mutation test done. Should she have this mutation she will need to speak with a genetic counselor who is savvy with BRCA mutations. The impact of BRCA positive mutations will need to be known by all of her physicians for treatment and follow up. Best wishes.

by overseas, Nov 02, 2009 03:22AM
To: SueYoung55
Thank you for your concern,  but I did not ask about genetics.  My question was VERY  specific  and for a reason.

by overseas, Nov 02, 2009 10:52AM
To: Doctor, Cleveland Clinic
Thank you, Doctor.  You reply was of great help  for my  "WHY poor prognosis"  question. As to all the necessary tests and therapy, everything  is being taken care of , as you may see in my brief summary. The oncologist is aware of everything and he takes very informed and responsible decisions as to the treatment of the patient.
I thanked Ms. SueYoung55  for her concern, but the genetic test had nothing to do with my  Ki-67 question; it simply was another matter of which we are aware and did not ask.
Again, I thank you so much for the explanation about Ki-67  and risk.
Sincerely,  overseas.
Post Comment
To
Comment
Post Comment
RSS Expert Activity
What You Don't Know About Breathing...
Nov 24 by Steven Y Park, MD
Thanksgiving
Nov 23 by Thomas Dock, Vet. Technician
Snoring As Your Internal Smoke Alar...
Nov 22 by Steven Y Park, MD