Hello! I posted this on the 'ask a doc' forum, but thought I would post here as well since experiences from other patients can be so valuable :)!
I would like to know if people ever get 'second opinions' after colonoscopies with findings such as what were included on my recent report (see below) with an adeonoma polyp. I am a 45-year old pre-menopausal female with no known colon cancer in the family, but had a colonoscopy because of anemia of unknown causes.
Here is what was found on my colonoscopy:
5 mm tubular adenoma negative for high-grade dysplasia or malignancy (it also mentions semi-sessile in the report).
I cannot see the doctor for follow-up discussions for another month, so I am really anxious about what this might mean. The nurse did tell me that he wants to see me back in 5 years instead of 10, so it sounds like they aren't too concerned with the results.
I was actually shocked by this finding, as I understand it is not cancerous, but is pre-cancerous. Even though it was removed, I am afraid of the following:
1. What if it wasn't removed completely? How can they be sure without taking a second look?
2. What if there were others that they didn't find?
What would be gained by getting a second opinion or even a second colonoscopy? That is NOT what I want to do, but also don't want to wait five years and live in a heightened state of anxiety.
Any thoughts from those who have experience with colonoscopies/polyps and have 'been there done that'??
It states in your report that it was negative for being malignant or pre-cancerous. Tubular adenomas are polyps which carry a very low risk for turning cancerous. Once a polyp is found they want to see you sooner because this means you are at risk for developing more, but doesn't mean you will. You should be seen in 5 years when you turn 50 regardless of them having found a polyp. Polyps are slow growing. I would relax, they remove polyps everyday and if they had any doubts they wouldn't want to wait 5 years. Hope this helps, and I wouldn't worry.
Thanks, Mammo :)) They did tell me it WAS pre-cancerous (but not malignant, meaning it was not currently cancerous, but that it COULD potentially years down the road). I do understand that they are slow-growing, and you are probably right......if they had any doubts they would not want to wait that long. I think when I heard the words 'pre-cancerous' that it really freaked me out. I am still going to ask if I can have it done before 5 years, but I am not nearly as panicky as I was those first few days. Do you know what the actual risk is, Mammo, for a tubular adenoma?? I am going to see if I can research and find out a number.........I think that would reassure me further :) If you have this info., please share. Thank you for your response, by the way!
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. Med Help International, Inc. is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.