Aa
California drought: Strife over groundwater boils over
http://www.sfchronicle.com/science/article/California-drought-Strife-over-groundwater-boils-5319209.php#/0
".....Groundwater is loosely regulated in California, but that could change. Years of dry conditions have lawmakers looking at groundwater in ways once considered too politically risky.
In many areas across the state, property owners - who have a right to the water under their land - don't have to disclose how much they use from shared basins. Those who oppose groundwater regulation consider it government overreach........
Groundwater has been regulated in vastly different ways from other water sources. California requires permits and licenses to take water from streams, rivers and lakes, but no such process exists for groundwater. Surface water and groundwater are treated differently in state law in a way that resource experts say makes little sense, given that one affects the other.
"California has the least structure and fewest requirements (compared with any other) state," said Andrew Fahlund, deputy director of the California Water Foundation. "The system has survived up to this point because we weren't facing a significant crisis."...........
"I like to think of groundwater as the state's water savings account," Fahlund said. "We are in a situation in many places where it's analogous to having overdrawn your savings account right before losing your job. We have this drought, and this is the time when you most need to rely on groundwater, but unfortunately our groundwater tables in many parts of the state have been overdrawn."........
"I think when people understand that our groundwater is disappearing and not coming back, acceptance for the need for careful monitoring is far more likely," said Jay Famiglietti, director of the UC Center for Hydrologic Modeling, while speaking at the California State Board of Food and Agriculture in November. "We are all focused on the surface water, and while no one is looking, we're pumping up the groundwater. I feel like no one is watching the groundwater, and it's running away.".........
".....Groundwater is loosely regulated in California, but that could change. Years of dry conditions have lawmakers looking at groundwater in ways once considered too politically risky.
In many areas across the state, property owners - who have a right to the water under their land - don't have to disclose how much they use from shared basins. Those who oppose groundwater regulation consider it government overreach........
Groundwater has been regulated in vastly different ways from other water sources. California requires permits and licenses to take water from streams, rivers and lakes, but no such process exists for groundwater. Surface water and groundwater are treated differently in state law in a way that resource experts say makes little sense, given that one affects the other.
"California has the least structure and fewest requirements (compared with any other) state," said Andrew Fahlund, deputy director of the California Water Foundation. "The system has survived up to this point because we weren't facing a significant crisis."...........
"I like to think of groundwater as the state's water savings account," Fahlund said. "We are in a situation in many places where it's analogous to having overdrawn your savings account right before losing your job. We have this drought, and this is the time when you most need to rely on groundwater, but unfortunately our groundwater tables in many parts of the state have been overdrawn."........
"I think when people understand that our groundwater is disappearing and not coming back, acceptance for the need for careful monitoring is far more likely," said Jay Famiglietti, director of the UC Center for Hydrologic Modeling, while speaking at the California State Board of Food and Agriculture in November. "We are all focused on the surface water, and while no one is looking, we're pumping up the groundwater. I feel like no one is watching the groundwater, and it's running away.".........
Well, my city has metered water and I pay according to usage.
The weird thing about this drought is despite it being worse than the one in the 70s, there is no mandatory water rationing or conservation being even talked about~ not where I live. So, I pass people watering lawns, washing cars, etc often with excess water running down the street.
dsrt~I believe before we begin water desalination we should start being conservative with our water usage.
The weird thing about this drought is despite it being worse than the one in the 70s, there is no mandatory water rationing or conservation being even talked about~ not where I live. So, I pass people watering lawns, washing cars, etc often with excess water running down the street.
dsrt~I believe before we begin water desalination we should start being conservative with our water usage.
California drought: Solar desalination plant shows promise
http://www.sfchronicle.com/science/article/California-drought-Solar-desalination-plant-5326024.php#/0
Fresno County Quietly whirring away in a dusty field in the Central Valley is a shiny solar energy machine that may someday solve many of California's water problems.
It's called the WaterFX solar thermal desalination plant, and it has been turning salty, contaminated irrigation runoff into ultra-pure liquid for nearly a year for the Panoche Water and Drainage District. It's the only solar-driven desalination plant of its kind in the country.
Right now its efforts produce just 14,000 gallons a day. But within a year, WaterFX intends to begin expanding that one small startup plant into a sprawling collection of 36 machines that together can pump out 2 million gallons of purified water daily.
Within about five years, WaterFX company co-founder Aaron Mandell hopes to be processing 10 times that amount throughout the San Joaquin Valley. And here's the part that gets the farmers who buy his water most excited: His solar desalination plant produces water that costs about a quarter of what more conventionally desalinated water costs: $450 an acre-foot versus $2,000 an acre-foot.
An acre-foot is equivalent to an acre covered by water 1 foot deep, enough to supply two families of four for a year.
Competitive price
That brings Mandell's water cost close to what farmers are paying, in wet years, for water from the Panoche and other valley districts - about $300 an acre-foot. And that makes it a more economically attractive option than any of the 17 conventional desalination plants planned throughout California.
If Mandell can pull it off, the tiny farming town where he is starting his enterprise could be known as ground zero for one of the most revolutionary water innovations in the state's history.
"Eventually, if this all goes where I think it can, California could wind up with so much water it's able to export it instead of having to deal with shortages," Mandell said, standing alongside the 525-foot-long solar reflector that is the heart of his machine. "What we are doing here is sustainable, scalable and affordable."
Saving water
Panoche expects to deliver about 45,000 acre-feet of water this year to its growers. That total is half of what the growers get in wetter years - but because drought and environmentally driven water mandates are not unique to 2014, the district's farmers are already ahead of the curve on water preservation techniques.
Most use drip irrigation instead of water-intensive sprinklers and are hooked up to an unusual drainage system that captures used irrigation water and directs it into fields of wheatgrass, a salt-tolerant crop sold for cattle feed. But that drainage system is little more than a creative way to get rid of irrigation water that's too salty for most uses once it leaches through farm soil.
Finding a way to make it suitable for people to drink and use on the crops they eat would be a breakthrough, Falaschi said.
"It appears this solar system will be cost-effective, and if Aaron can perform as we think he can, it can make a huge difference - be a great supplement at the very least," he said. "We're talking about basically unusable drainage water that is in everybody's interest to mine.
Nothing from feds
Panoche, like many districts in the Central Valley - the nation's most productive agricultural zone - has traditionally bought most of its water from the federally run Central Valley Project. But in this drought year, farmers are likely to get zero allocation from the project.
If that happens, Panoche will have to draw from leftover supply, the expensive spot water market and wells. All of that is pricier than usual, with the spot market alone charging as much as $3,500 an acre-foot.
"This situation right now is a killer, and anything that adds to a potential water supply is good," said Mike Stearns, a fourth-generation farmer in the Panoche district who is fallowing most of his tomato, onion and other fields this year because of the drought. He's concentrating on his wine grapes, which are thirsty but promise a good profit even in a drought year.
"And keep in mind that this water shortage doesn't just affect farmers," Stearns said. "Think about the jobs that are lost when we have to fallow our fields. Or the taxes that the government won't get because we aren't growing and selling. It's bad. We need to do everything we can about this."
Simple process
The way the solar plant works is simple, which is why the water it produces is cheap.
Water that dribbles down from nearby hills, and through the soil in the Central Valley after being used for irrigation, collects so much salt, selenium, boron and other minerals that it's not fit for human consumption. The solar plant captures the foothill runoff and ***** in used irrigation water from a French drain-style system 6 to 8 feet under the crops, and sends that tainted water through a series of pipes and tanks that heat it.
The heat comes from the plant's huge, parabolic-shaped solar reflector, which focuses the sun on a long tube containing mineral oil. That heated tube in turn creates steam, which condenses the brackish water into usable liquid, separating out the minerals.
The water then goes back out for irrigation. Mandell says that because his condensation method distills the minerals more efficiently than other desalination methods, he is installing a system that will process them for use. Selenium and boron can be vitamin supplements, for example, and gypsum can be used for drywall.
More conventional desalination plants - such as a $1 billion operation being built near San Diego - use a reverse osmosis process, in which brackish water is forced through screens to filter out the contaminants. That requires a lot of energy, which is why it is more expensive.
Raising money
WaterFX's pilot plant cost $1 million in state grants to build last summer. The expansion of the 36-plant complex would cost as much as $30 million, which Mandell is working on raising.
Mandell's expanded solar plant would be able to deliver 2,200 acre-feet of water next year - and if that performs as hoped, within a few years his ambition is to scale it up to 20,000 acre-feet. That would meet nearly half of the current demand from Panoche district farmers.
"Eventually we could process not just drainage water, but industrial and residential wastewater as well as groundwater that now is too salty to use," Mandell said. Such desalination already happens on a large scale in other parts of the world, particularly the Middle East, he pointed out.
Sinking land
Drawing groundwater, however - even groundwater that's now too salty to drink - could prove problematic in the Central Valley. Years of tapping usable groundwater have so depleted aquifers that in some places the land has sunk 30 feet since the 1920s.
There are trillions of gallons of brackish groundwater available in California, said Claudia Faunt, a U.S. Geological Survey hydrologist, and much of that has not been tapped because it is closer to the surface than the purer liquid deeper down. However, "to say there wouldn't be subsidence (if it were tapped) is an unknown," she said.
For now, Mandell said, he and his partners are focusing on drainage water - and that alone is a major issue.
"Look, there are 200 million tons of salt on the land in the Central Valley, and billions of gallons of drainage water, and cleaning up that drainage water is a huge issue," said WaterFX's chief consultant, Bruce Marlow. "I'd say if we can control the saline in the valley, in 10 years we might not have to rely on the federal water system here at all."
http://www.sfchronicle.com/science/article/California-drought-Solar-desalination-plant-5326024.php#/0
Fresno County Quietly whirring away in a dusty field in the Central Valley is a shiny solar energy machine that may someday solve many of California's water problems.
It's called the WaterFX solar thermal desalination plant, and it has been turning salty, contaminated irrigation runoff into ultra-pure liquid for nearly a year for the Panoche Water and Drainage District. It's the only solar-driven desalination plant of its kind in the country.
Right now its efforts produce just 14,000 gallons a day. But within a year, WaterFX intends to begin expanding that one small startup plant into a sprawling collection of 36 machines that together can pump out 2 million gallons of purified water daily.
Within about five years, WaterFX company co-founder Aaron Mandell hopes to be processing 10 times that amount throughout the San Joaquin Valley. And here's the part that gets the farmers who buy his water most excited: His solar desalination plant produces water that costs about a quarter of what more conventionally desalinated water costs: $450 an acre-foot versus $2,000 an acre-foot.
An acre-foot is equivalent to an acre covered by water 1 foot deep, enough to supply two families of four for a year.
Competitive price
That brings Mandell's water cost close to what farmers are paying, in wet years, for water from the Panoche and other valley districts - about $300 an acre-foot. And that makes it a more economically attractive option than any of the 17 conventional desalination plants planned throughout California.
If Mandell can pull it off, the tiny farming town where he is starting his enterprise could be known as ground zero for one of the most revolutionary water innovations in the state's history.
"Eventually, if this all goes where I think it can, California could wind up with so much water it's able to export it instead of having to deal with shortages," Mandell said, standing alongside the 525-foot-long solar reflector that is the heart of his machine. "What we are doing here is sustainable, scalable and affordable."
Saving water
Panoche expects to deliver about 45,000 acre-feet of water this year to its growers. That total is half of what the growers get in wetter years - but because drought and environmentally driven water mandates are not unique to 2014, the district's farmers are already ahead of the curve on water preservation techniques.
Most use drip irrigation instead of water-intensive sprinklers and are hooked up to an unusual drainage system that captures used irrigation water and directs it into fields of wheatgrass, a salt-tolerant crop sold for cattle feed. But that drainage system is little more than a creative way to get rid of irrigation water that's too salty for most uses once it leaches through farm soil.
Finding a way to make it suitable for people to drink and use on the crops they eat would be a breakthrough, Falaschi said.
"It appears this solar system will be cost-effective, and if Aaron can perform as we think he can, it can make a huge difference - be a great supplement at the very least," he said. "We're talking about basically unusable drainage water that is in everybody's interest to mine.
Nothing from feds
Panoche, like many districts in the Central Valley - the nation's most productive agricultural zone - has traditionally bought most of its water from the federally run Central Valley Project. But in this drought year, farmers are likely to get zero allocation from the project.
If that happens, Panoche will have to draw from leftover supply, the expensive spot water market and wells. All of that is pricier than usual, with the spot market alone charging as much as $3,500 an acre-foot.
"This situation right now is a killer, and anything that adds to a potential water supply is good," said Mike Stearns, a fourth-generation farmer in the Panoche district who is fallowing most of his tomato, onion and other fields this year because of the drought. He's concentrating on his wine grapes, which are thirsty but promise a good profit even in a drought year.
"And keep in mind that this water shortage doesn't just affect farmers," Stearns said. "Think about the jobs that are lost when we have to fallow our fields. Or the taxes that the government won't get because we aren't growing and selling. It's bad. We need to do everything we can about this."
Simple process
The way the solar plant works is simple, which is why the water it produces is cheap.
Water that dribbles down from nearby hills, and through the soil in the Central Valley after being used for irrigation, collects so much salt, selenium, boron and other minerals that it's not fit for human consumption. The solar plant captures the foothill runoff and ***** in used irrigation water from a French drain-style system 6 to 8 feet under the crops, and sends that tainted water through a series of pipes and tanks that heat it.
The heat comes from the plant's huge, parabolic-shaped solar reflector, which focuses the sun on a long tube containing mineral oil. That heated tube in turn creates steam, which condenses the brackish water into usable liquid, separating out the minerals.
The water then goes back out for irrigation. Mandell says that because his condensation method distills the minerals more efficiently than other desalination methods, he is installing a system that will process them for use. Selenium and boron can be vitamin supplements, for example, and gypsum can be used for drywall.
More conventional desalination plants - such as a $1 billion operation being built near San Diego - use a reverse osmosis process, in which brackish water is forced through screens to filter out the contaminants. That requires a lot of energy, which is why it is more expensive.
Raising money
WaterFX's pilot plant cost $1 million in state grants to build last summer. The expansion of the 36-plant complex would cost as much as $30 million, which Mandell is working on raising.
Mandell's expanded solar plant would be able to deliver 2,200 acre-feet of water next year - and if that performs as hoped, within a few years his ambition is to scale it up to 20,000 acre-feet. That would meet nearly half of the current demand from Panoche district farmers.
"Eventually we could process not just drainage water, but industrial and residential wastewater as well as groundwater that now is too salty to use," Mandell said. Such desalination already happens on a large scale in other parts of the world, particularly the Middle East, he pointed out.
Sinking land
Drawing groundwater, however - even groundwater that's now too salty to drink - could prove problematic in the Central Valley. Years of tapping usable groundwater have so depleted aquifers that in some places the land has sunk 30 feet since the 1920s.
There are trillions of gallons of brackish groundwater available in California, said Claudia Faunt, a U.S. Geological Survey hydrologist, and much of that has not been tapped because it is closer to the surface than the purer liquid deeper down. However, "to say there wouldn't be subsidence (if it were tapped) is an unknown," she said.
For now, Mandell said, he and his partners are focusing on drainage water - and that alone is a major issue.
"Look, there are 200 million tons of salt on the land in the Central Valley, and billions of gallons of drainage water, and cleaning up that drainage water is a huge issue," said WaterFX's chief consultant, Bruce Marlow. "I'd say if we can control the saline in the valley, in 10 years we might not have to rely on the federal water system here at all."
Not quite sure, I'll have to check. I honestly don't follow the state news, short of what is reported nationally. I saw this article posted, thought it was interesting on water vs MBTu gained. Can't post the chart though:
"However, as the following table shows, fracking uses much less water than other energy sources. To produce one million British Thermal Units (MMBtu) of energy, natural gas from fracking uses an average of 1.25 gallons of water. Biofuels use over 2,500 gallons of water per MMBtu. If the concern of environmentalists is saving water, they should attack biofuels and synfuels."
http://www.economics21.org/commentary/fracking-saves-water
"However, as the following table shows, fracking uses much less water than other energy sources. To produce one million British Thermal Units (MMBtu) of energy, natural gas from fracking uses an average of 1.25 gallons of water. Biofuels use over 2,500 gallons of water per MMBtu. If the concern of environmentalists is saving water, they should attack biofuels and synfuels."
http://www.economics21.org/commentary/fracking-saves-water
I'd be interested to know where these unmetered municipalities are. Everywhere I go in N. Cal. every drop is metered -- and billed. Sounds like some contractor could make a killing if there are actually large water systems without metered services.
I was having and listening a conversation on another forum and was a bit shocked to find out many who were using water from a city water system had no water meters there in Calf...Crazy, calls for conservation or rationing were basically unenforceable--no way to quantify the water usage.
Hell, I even have a meter on my well so sewerage fees can be charged according to gallons used.
"Bob, as I've posted before, in Southern Cal, we have been building/increasing our storage capacity steadily over the last couple of decades to the point where it looked as if we were going to have to send water north because although they have some significant storage there, it has remained static over the last couple of decades and they have no experience with drought, let alone water meters to even know exactly how much anyone is "cutting back", etc."
Hell, I even have a meter on my well so sewerage fees can be charged according to gallons used.
"Bob, as I've posted before, in Southern Cal, we have been building/increasing our storage capacity steadily over the last couple of decades to the point where it looked as if we were going to have to send water north because although they have some significant storage there, it has remained static over the last couple of decades and they have no experience with drought, let alone water meters to even know exactly how much anyone is "cutting back", etc."
Water is a big deal where I live. People are already yelling that about new big new vineyards being put in along with deep wells that take our already limited supply of water.
We need food to eat but do we really need yet another vineyard ??
We need food to eat but do we really need yet another vineyard ??
You must join this user group in order to participate in this discussion.
You are reading content posted in the Current Events . . . Group
A list of national and international resources and hotlines to help connect you to needed health and medical services.
Herpes sores blister, then burst, scab and heal.
Herpes spreads by oral, vaginal and anal sex.
STIs are the most common cause of genital sores.
Condoms are the most effective way to prevent HIV and STDs.
PrEP is used by people with high risk to prevent HIV infection.
