Aa
How Donald Trump Would Be Able To Not Pay Income Taxes For 18 Years
http://www.npr.org/2016/10/02/496303458/how-donald-trump-could-have-not-paid-income-taxes-for-18-years
"We don't really know what Donald Trump paid in taxes, because unlike every other major presidential candidate in the last four decades, the GOP nominee has refused to release his tax returns. But the New York Times offers a tantalizing theory that Trump could have legally escaped income tax liability on hundreds of millions of dollars, thanks to staggering losses from two decades ago.
That he could have done so while still enjoying a lavish lifestyle is testament to both the flexibility of the federal tax code—especially when it comes to real estate professionals—and the willingness of creditors and investors to keep propping up a businessman who had already lost nearly a billion dollars.
The Times account is based on a fragmentary sample of Trump's tax returns from a single year that were leaked to the newspaper by an anonymous source. Trump's former accountant confirmed their authenticity for the paper.
The forms show that in 1995, Trump claimed a business loss of nearly $916 million. Much of that likely resulted from Trump's business losses in previous years, including money-losing casinos in Atlantic City and the Trump Shuttle airline.
At the time, the tax code allowed such losses to be "carried forward" up to 15 years, offsetting income and reducing or even eliminating tax liability and carried backward on income up to 3 years prior. (The allowance has since been changed to carry forward 20 years and carry back 2 years.) The code is particularly flexible when it comes to real estate professionals like Trump.
A doctor who owns a rental property and loses money on it can only use that loss to offset rental income, not what he or she earns practicing medicine.
But thanks to more generous allowances for real estate professionals, Trump would have been allowed to use his casino losses to offset income from unrelated work, including the millions he earned as star of "The Apprentice" television show, or licensing his name to the maker of Trump neckties.
"Here's the magic of real estate," says Lee Sheppard, contributing editor of Tax Notes, a Washington-based journal. "Congress, which writes the tax laws, affirmatively subsidizes commercial real estate through the mechanism of the tax code."
The favorable treatment of real estate developers is just one example of the way the tax code rewards real estate development and investment. The popular tax deduction for home ownership is another, and one of the costliest in the overall code.
"Real estate is a very powerful lobby in Washington," Sheppard says. "There used to be a running joke that it would be cheaper for the government to make real estate tax-exempt."
The losses cited on Trump's 1995 return were so massive, he could have earned up to $50 million dollars a year for nearly two decades without owing any income tax.
"Mr. Trump was a spectacular loser," said Steve Rosenthal, a former staffer for the Joint Congressional Committee on Taxation and a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center.
Because the tax records obtained by the New York Times are fragmentary, we don't know the detail behind the losses that Trump claimed that year. A separate statement describing the losses was not included in the leaked documents.
"That's why we should see his tax returns," said Rosenthal. "Was Mr. Trump really losing money that spectacularly? Or was he ginning up his losses" through accounting maneuvers?
It's a provocative question for a presidential candidate whose campaign is largely based on his purported success as a businessman.
"Donald Trump has a long, well-documented history of reporting different numbers" to different audiences, said David Cay Johnston, an investigative reporter, tax expert, and author of The Making of Donald Trump.
Trump's Atlantic City casino empire, overbuilt and overleveraged, hemorrhaged money during the 1990s and ultimately filed for bankruptcy. Investors in his public company lost more than $1 billion, and a number of businesses that worked on the casinos went unpaid.
But debts that were personally guaranteed by Trump were transferred to others, while Trump himself collected tens of millions of dollars in salary and bonuses.
For years, investors and creditors went along in the belief that Trump and his lavish public lifestyle added value to the aspirational casino business.
"If his lifestyle is part of the brand, his lifestyle is kind of a business expense in itself," said Sheppard."
"We don't really know what Donald Trump paid in taxes, because unlike every other major presidential candidate in the last four decades, the GOP nominee has refused to release his tax returns. But the New York Times offers a tantalizing theory that Trump could have legally escaped income tax liability on hundreds of millions of dollars, thanks to staggering losses from two decades ago.
That he could have done so while still enjoying a lavish lifestyle is testament to both the flexibility of the federal tax code—especially when it comes to real estate professionals—and the willingness of creditors and investors to keep propping up a businessman who had already lost nearly a billion dollars.
The Times account is based on a fragmentary sample of Trump's tax returns from a single year that were leaked to the newspaper by an anonymous source. Trump's former accountant confirmed their authenticity for the paper.
The forms show that in 1995, Trump claimed a business loss of nearly $916 million. Much of that likely resulted from Trump's business losses in previous years, including money-losing casinos in Atlantic City and the Trump Shuttle airline.
At the time, the tax code allowed such losses to be "carried forward" up to 15 years, offsetting income and reducing or even eliminating tax liability and carried backward on income up to 3 years prior. (The allowance has since been changed to carry forward 20 years and carry back 2 years.) The code is particularly flexible when it comes to real estate professionals like Trump.
A doctor who owns a rental property and loses money on it can only use that loss to offset rental income, not what he or she earns practicing medicine.
But thanks to more generous allowances for real estate professionals, Trump would have been allowed to use his casino losses to offset income from unrelated work, including the millions he earned as star of "The Apprentice" television show, or licensing his name to the maker of Trump neckties.
"Here's the magic of real estate," says Lee Sheppard, contributing editor of Tax Notes, a Washington-based journal. "Congress, which writes the tax laws, affirmatively subsidizes commercial real estate through the mechanism of the tax code."
The favorable treatment of real estate developers is just one example of the way the tax code rewards real estate development and investment. The popular tax deduction for home ownership is another, and one of the costliest in the overall code.
"Real estate is a very powerful lobby in Washington," Sheppard says. "There used to be a running joke that it would be cheaper for the government to make real estate tax-exempt."
The losses cited on Trump's 1995 return were so massive, he could have earned up to $50 million dollars a year for nearly two decades without owing any income tax.
"Mr. Trump was a spectacular loser," said Steve Rosenthal, a former staffer for the Joint Congressional Committee on Taxation and a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center.
Because the tax records obtained by the New York Times are fragmentary, we don't know the detail behind the losses that Trump claimed that year. A separate statement describing the losses was not included in the leaked documents.
"That's why we should see his tax returns," said Rosenthal. "Was Mr. Trump really losing money that spectacularly? Or was he ginning up his losses" through accounting maneuvers?
It's a provocative question for a presidential candidate whose campaign is largely based on his purported success as a businessman.
"Donald Trump has a long, well-documented history of reporting different numbers" to different audiences, said David Cay Johnston, an investigative reporter, tax expert, and author of The Making of Donald Trump.
Trump's Atlantic City casino empire, overbuilt and overleveraged, hemorrhaged money during the 1990s and ultimately filed for bankruptcy. Investors in his public company lost more than $1 billion, and a number of businesses that worked on the casinos went unpaid.
But debts that were personally guaranteed by Trump were transferred to others, while Trump himself collected tens of millions of dollars in salary and bonuses.
For years, investors and creditors went along in the belief that Trump and his lavish public lifestyle added value to the aspirational casino business.
"If his lifestyle is part of the brand, his lifestyle is kind of a business expense in itself," said Sheppard."
He really is awful. I can't think of enough words to describe him, I am blown away by this information. I keep thinking he can't possibly get any lower, then I find out he can :)
I saw a reputed real estate tax expert explaining a tax loophole that shocked me. I don't independently know whether this guy was right but he seemed very credible. He said that theoretically Trump could have initiated a project whereby he put in 1 million dollars of his own money and had a bank participate with a loan of 99 million dollars. If the project went bust and the bank forgave the 99 million loan Trump could have taken a 100 million dollar loss on the project and would not have had to acknowledge the 99 million dollar loan forgiveness as income. The expert said that the law was changed in 2002 to prohibit this type of thing but that it was legal to do this beforehand. In short Trump could have made a fortune going broke in projects by offsetting what would otherwise be taxable income with this "paper loss". So maybe Trump never really lost that nearly 1 billion dollars and therefore his "remarkable" comeback may be in large part because of this type of loophole.
1 Comments
Another interview on NPR speculated that this was exactly what happened - the money written off was, in fact, his investors'.
Pretty despicable, isn't he ?
1 Comments
I'm going to put in a new composting bin next week and start referring to myself as a 'real estate developer'.
You must join this user group in order to participate in this discussion.
You are reading content posted in the Current Events . . . Group
A list of national and international resources and hotlines to help connect you to needed health and medical services.
Herpes sores blister, then burst, scab and heal.
Herpes spreads by oral, vaginal and anal sex.
STIs are the most common cause of genital sores.
Condoms are the most effective way to prevent HIV and STDs.
PrEP is used by people with high risk to prevent HIV infection.
