Aa
A
A
Close
163305 tn?1333672171
How HSBC allegedly became the ‘preferred’ bank for Mexican drug cartels
HSBC Holdings PLC reached a landmark $1.9 billion settlement with U.S. authorities over allegations that the U.K-based big bank intentionally permitted illegal transactions with a variety of countries including Iran, Libya, Sudan and Burma.

However, documents released Tuesday provide new details also about how HSBC allegedly became “the preferred bank” for narcotics drug cartels in Mexico and Colombia and left “dangerous gaps” that traffickers abused with major cash deposits– all while top executives froze staffing at the bank’s anti-money-laundering unit.

A Justice Department statement notes that banks are supposed to try to mitigate money-laundering risks by monitoring wire transfers. HSBC allegedly used an internal system that would trigger a review of wire transfers based on the amount of the transaction and the type and location of the customer.

However, between 2002 and 2009 HSBC ranked Mexico as having “standard” money laundering risks, the lowest of the bank’s four possible country risk ratings. As a result, the Justice Department contends that its transactions in Mexico weren’t subject to HSBC’s automated monitoring unless customers were classified as high risk. Read about how HSBC officials were quizzed about money-laundering in July

Basically, the low ranking allowed “hundreds of billions of dollars” in wire transfers from Mexico to be excluded from the bank’s internal reviews, as a result, the Justice Department alleges.

Specifically, the government says HSBC failed to monitor over $670 billion in wire transfers from HSBC’s Mexico division between 2006 and 2009 and failed to monitor over $9.4 billion in purchases of U.S. dollars from HSBC’s Mexico unit over the same period. (The Justice Department’s said HSBC’s Mexico division became the “preferred financial institution for drug cartels and money-launderers.”)

The Treasury Department notes that HSBC allowed “hundreds of millions of dollars” from Mexican drug trafficking organizations to flow though accounts in the U.S” even though the bank had “substantial resources” to limit money-laundering risks.

Specifically, $881 million in drug trafficking proceeds by the Sinaloa Cartel in Mexico and the Norte del Valle Cartel in Columbia were laundered through HSBC’s U.S. unit without being detected by the bank, the Justice Department alleges.

The agency also adds that HSBC failed to monitor over $200 trillion in wire transfers between 2006 and 2009 from countries that HSBC’s U.S. unit deemed to be “standard” or “medium” risk.

http://blogs.marketwatch.com/election/2012/12/11/how-hsbc-allegedly-became-the-preferred-bank-for-mexican-drug-cartels/
Discussion is closed
Cancel
2 Answers
Page 1 of 1
163305 tn?1333672171
The bank not only was too big to fail but too big to jail.
Discussion is closed
Cancel
Comment
1530342 tn?1405020090
CRAZY!....
Discussion is closed
Cancel
Comment
You must join this user group in order to participate in this discussion.
A
A
Recent Activity
317787 tn?1473362051
Blank
Dee1956 Meegy 172 days!! Coincidenc... Comment
Dec 01
317787 tn?1473362051
Blank
Dee1956 commented on Belle313's status
Nov 30
Avatar universal
Blank
Derekcarter commented on Derealization and Dep...
Nov 30