Aa
Native American Council Offers Amnesty to 240 Million Undocumented Whites
http://cityworldnews.com/native-american-amnesty/
"At a meeting on Friday in Taos, New Mexico, Native American leaders weighed a handful of proposals about the future of the United State’s large, illegal European population. After a long debate, NANC decided to extend a road to citizenship for those without criminal records or contagious diseases.
“We will give Europeans the option to apply for Native Citizenship,” explained Chief Sauti of the Nez Perce tribe. “To obtain legal status, each applicant must write a heartfelt apology for their ancestors’ crimes, pay an application fee of $5,000, and, if currently on any ancestral Native land, they must relinquish that land to NANC or pay the market price, which we decide.
“Any illegal European who has a criminal record of any sort, minus traffic and parking tickets, will be deported back to their native land. Anybody with contagious diseases like HIV, smallpox, herpes, etc, will not qualify and will also be deported.”
European colonization of North America began in the 16th and 17th centuries, when arrivals from France, Spain and England first established settlements on land that had been occupied by native peoples. Explorers Lewis & Clark further opened up western lands to settlement, which ultimately led to the creation of the Indian reservation system.
Despite the large number of Europeans residing in the United States, historical scholars mostly agree that indigenous lands were taken illegally through war, genocide and forced displacement.
Despite the council’s decision, a native group called True Americans lambasted the move, claiming amnesty will only serve to reward lawbreakers.
“They all need to be deported back to Europe,” John Dakota from True Americans said. “They came here illegally and took a giant crap on our land. They brought disease and alcoholism, stole everything we have because they were too lazy to improve and develop their own countries.”
"At a meeting on Friday in Taos, New Mexico, Native American leaders weighed a handful of proposals about the future of the United State’s large, illegal European population. After a long debate, NANC decided to extend a road to citizenship for those without criminal records or contagious diseases.
“We will give Europeans the option to apply for Native Citizenship,” explained Chief Sauti of the Nez Perce tribe. “To obtain legal status, each applicant must write a heartfelt apology for their ancestors’ crimes, pay an application fee of $5,000, and, if currently on any ancestral Native land, they must relinquish that land to NANC or pay the market price, which we decide.
“Any illegal European who has a criminal record of any sort, minus traffic and parking tickets, will be deported back to their native land. Anybody with contagious diseases like HIV, smallpox, herpes, etc, will not qualify and will also be deported.”
European colonization of North America began in the 16th and 17th centuries, when arrivals from France, Spain and England first established settlements on land that had been occupied by native peoples. Explorers Lewis & Clark further opened up western lands to settlement, which ultimately led to the creation of the Indian reservation system.
Despite the large number of Europeans residing in the United States, historical scholars mostly agree that indigenous lands were taken illegally through war, genocide and forced displacement.
Despite the council’s decision, a native group called True Americans lambasted the move, claiming amnesty will only serve to reward lawbreakers.
“They all need to be deported back to Europe,” John Dakota from True Americans said. “They came here illegally and took a giant crap on our land. They brought disease and alcoholism, stole everything we have because they were too lazy to improve and develop their own countries.”
Go back and reread what I wrote Einstein.
Baloney !
I never said no one was here before Vikings. I said Vikings were here before what is known as the modern day Indians. The modern day Indians are desendants from Asian population.
Why in the world would you think there weren't any people in North America when the Vikings came ? Of course there were !
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/11/101123-native-american-indian-vikings-iceland-genetic-dna-science-europe/
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/11/101123-native-american-indian-vikings-iceland-genetic-dna-science-europe/
The Vikings were not here ( according to what I've found) before the Anastasia people.
I'm tired of playing this game with you.
Believe what you want but don't try to convince us it's fact.
I'm tired of playing this game with you.
Believe what you want but don't try to convince us it's fact.
The only fairy tale comes from you. Vikings were here before Indians, people from South/Latin America here here before Indians...FACT SISTER.
Ignorant simply means "lacking knowledge, information, or awareness about something in particular."
As far as there being other people here prior to the Native Americans, that may well be true but the facts about how things changed is lost in the distant past.You can assume whatever you please but that doesn't make it fact. Don't try to pass off fairy tales as fact.
As far as there being other people here prior to the Native Americans, that may well be true but the facts about how things changed is lost in the distant past.You can assume whatever you please but that doesn't make it fact. Don't try to pass off fairy tales as fact.
Sorry just playing an eye for an eye.
Be careful... we're not calling people/views ignorant anymore - or posts will be deleted.
Difference of opinion does not constitute ignorance...
Difference of opinion does not constitute ignorance...
People were here long before the Indians, so the Indians stole the land from them. The only ignorant view is yours.
Right - Mexico or any other country, for that matter... Get caught in Mexico without the right paperwork and you go directly to jail, without passing "Go"... and we know how long it takes to get out of one of their jails!!
And more specifically, go to any other country and try to turn it into something like the U.S. and see how far you get.
Some people make it sound like the United States is the only country in the world with immigration laws and that our laws are so horrible they shouldn't exist. Maybe some of them are obsolete - there's nothing to say that some laws shouldn't be changed or amended, but to advocate simply ignoring or breaking them is a little far out there.
And more specifically, go to any other country and try to turn it into something like the U.S. and see how far you get.
Some people make it sound like the United States is the only country in the world with immigration laws and that our laws are so horrible they shouldn't exist. Maybe some of them are obsolete - there's nothing to say that some laws shouldn't be changed or amended, but to advocate simply ignoring or breaking them is a little far out there.
Try to go to Mexico and pull the same $hit and see what happens!
Sorry I didn't get back here... been fighting with a tummy bug all day and I hope I've won!!
dsert - I'm not saying we should slam the doors on immigration - not by a long shot. I'm simply saying that anyone who wants to come to this country needs to come in the proper way and go through the process. No one should get to start their lives here by breaking the law and ultimately being rewarded for it by gaining citizenship when millions of others had to wait in their home country to be accepted, sometimes for years before being allowed to come here.
I'm not saying that everything that was done to the American Indian was right - that's a whole separate issue... I'm simply saying that when America was first colonized none of these laws existed and they do now...
Why even make immigration laws if they are so unimportant that they can be ignored so easily? Why not just wipe every one off the books and let in everyone who chooses to come in and grant them citizenship without requiring loyalty to our country or anything else from them - obviously, that's what some would like to do.
We already have too many people in this country who aren't loyal to it and would like to turn into something resembling their home country, why do we want to bring more who would destroy us? And if people want something like their home county, why don't they stay home?
dsert - I'm not saying we should slam the doors on immigration - not by a long shot. I'm simply saying that anyone who wants to come to this country needs to come in the proper way and go through the process. No one should get to start their lives here by breaking the law and ultimately being rewarded for it by gaining citizenship when millions of others had to wait in their home country to be accepted, sometimes for years before being allowed to come here.
I'm not saying that everything that was done to the American Indian was right - that's a whole separate issue... I'm simply saying that when America was first colonized none of these laws existed and they do now...
Why even make immigration laws if they are so unimportant that they can be ignored so easily? Why not just wipe every one off the books and let in everyone who chooses to come in and grant them citizenship without requiring loyalty to our country or anything else from them - obviously, that's what some would like to do.
We already have too many people in this country who aren't loyal to it and would like to turn into something resembling their home country, why do we want to bring more who would destroy us? And if people want something like their home county, why don't they stay home?
As desert accurately pointed out not all tribes were nomadic. In fact if you were informed about the Indigenous people who populated this continent prior to Columbus, you'd learn that there were many differing tribes, some quite primitive and others very advanced, so advanced that our founding fathers 'borrowed' some of their form of government.
BTW: your ignorant views of the American Indian are shared by others, I suggest reading 1491 by Charles C Mann.
BTW: your ignorant views of the American Indian are shared by others, I suggest reading 1491 by Charles C Mann.
The Natives near where I live were far from 'nomadic', having lived here for thousands of years. How 'nomadic' are those who live in trailer parks today?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloody_Island_Massacre
"A number of Pomo, primarily members living in the Big Valley area, had been enslaved, interned, and severely abused by settlers Andrew Kelsey and Charles Stone.[3] (The town of Kelseyville, California was named after the former man.) Kelsey and Stone purchased cattle running free in Big Valley from Salvador Vallejo in 1847. They captured and impressed local Pomo to work as vaqueros (cowboys). They also forced them to build them a permanent shelter with promises for rations that were not kept. Because they made a residence there their treatment of the Pomo was more brutal than had been Vallejo's, though the massacred Pomos at Anderson Island might have argued that point. The people were eventually confined to a village surrounded by a stockade and were not allowed weapons or fishing implements. Families starved on the meager rations they provided, only four cups of wheat a day for a family. When one young man asked for more wheat for his sick mother, Stone reportedly killed him.[4] In the fall of 1849, Kelsey forced 50 Pomo men to work as laborers on a second gold-seeking expedition to the Placer gold fields. Kelsey became ill with malaria and sold the rations to other miners. The Pomo starved, and only one or two men returned alive.[5]
Stone and Kelsey regularly forced the Pomo parents to bring their daughters to them to be sexually abused. If they refused they were whipped mercilessly. A number of them died from that abuse........."
Barb: An open door policy is a great thing as long as it's you or yours coming through it. After that, make a law and slam the door?
Brice: Agree it shouldn't be a race issue. My family came here in the 1920s and not only had to prove financial solvency and have a needed skill, but also have a sponsor to assure they would never be a burden to society.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloody_Island_Massacre
"A number of Pomo, primarily members living in the Big Valley area, had been enslaved, interned, and severely abused by settlers Andrew Kelsey and Charles Stone.[3] (The town of Kelseyville, California was named after the former man.) Kelsey and Stone purchased cattle running free in Big Valley from Salvador Vallejo in 1847. They captured and impressed local Pomo to work as vaqueros (cowboys). They also forced them to build them a permanent shelter with promises for rations that were not kept. Because they made a residence there their treatment of the Pomo was more brutal than had been Vallejo's, though the massacred Pomos at Anderson Island might have argued that point. The people were eventually confined to a village surrounded by a stockade and were not allowed weapons or fishing implements. Families starved on the meager rations they provided, only four cups of wheat a day for a family. When one young man asked for more wheat for his sick mother, Stone reportedly killed him.[4] In the fall of 1849, Kelsey forced 50 Pomo men to work as laborers on a second gold-seeking expedition to the Placer gold fields. Kelsey became ill with malaria and sold the rations to other miners. The Pomo starved, and only one or two men returned alive.[5]
Stone and Kelsey regularly forced the Pomo parents to bring their daughters to them to be sexually abused. If they refused they were whipped mercilessly. A number of them died from that abuse........."
Barb: An open door policy is a great thing as long as it's you or yours coming through it. After that, make a law and slam the door?
Brice: Agree it shouldn't be a race issue. My family came here in the 1920s and not only had to prove financial solvency and have a needed skill, but also have a sponsor to assure they would never be a burden to society.
I'm worn out on illegal immigration being a "race issue". It's not a race issue. It's a legal issue. There are laws in place that by themselves have absolutely no emphasis on race, gender, religion or sexual preference. There is NO discrimination involved.
We have quite a few illegal immigrants from middle and eastern Europe. All of them are white. I am against them being here illegally, but I am white. Does that make me racist?
We have quite a few illegal immigrants from middle and eastern Europe. All of them are white. I am against them being here illegally, but I am white. Does that make me racist?
There were no laws against immigration when Europeans started coming to this country. Once laws were passed, the majority of people who entered the country did so legally and went through the legal process to become citizens. It was only after people began to learn that nothing would happen to them that illegal immigration began on a large scale.
I am tired of Indians, they have no claim to America. They were nomads in a land mass that was vast and they did not establish anything. Tribes at war with each other moving from place to place.
Also it appears that other civilations were here before they were.
Also it appears that other civilations were here before they were.
Back to the original post, I think it makes a good point that unless you are of Native American descent, we are all from immigrant stock.
I would have pounded Lynch also or just let Wilson keep it. No way am I throwing that ball unless it is 4th down and even then I am doing a playaction pass and have Wilson run a bootleg with the possibility of him keeping the ball.
I group of us had a Super Bowl Party at a friend’s house. There was only one Seahawk Fan there.
He was talking smack saying, “Ya’ll watch, here it comes.” Then came the interception.
I wish I would have had a camera, his reaction was hilarious.
He was talking smack saying, “Ya’ll watch, here it comes.” Then came the interception.
I wish I would have had a camera, his reaction was hilarious.
I hear what you are saying about Carroll getting called out if Lynch ran/didn't score or turned the ball over. I just can't get over the fact that you've got the best running back in the league. He's scored more touchdowns than anyone else in the league. He hadn't been stopped in the backfield all day. He averaged 4.3 yards a carry in the game.... I'd give him the ball 3 times in a row if I had too.
Some idiot tried to say that the play call was based on Christianity and race. As Wilson is some what bi racial and an outspoken believer in Jesus, while Lynch is more of a thug type. So white america wanted to see the good looking boy as the hero and not the thug.
It was a dumb play call and the DB jumped the route. But if Lynch was stopped and turned the ball over on downs then Carroll would have been called out for not passing.
It was a dumb play call and the DB jumped the route. But if Lynch was stopped and turned the ball over on downs then Carroll would have been called out for not passing.
Pete Carroll has taken responsibility for the call. (Wonder if he is a democrat?) With that being said, it was an idiotic call. You've got the best running back in the league who scored more touch downs than anyone in the league and he hadn't been stopped in the back field all day.... and then you try to pass the ball? Marshawn Lynch gets the ball 3 times in that situation. Odds are he scores within the first 2 tries.
You must join this user group in order to participate in this discussion.
You are reading content posted in the Current Events . . . Group
A list of national and international resources and hotlines to help connect you to needed health and medical services.
Herpes sores blister, then burst, scab and heal.
Herpes spreads by oral, vaginal and anal sex.
STIs are the most common cause of genital sores.
Condoms are the most effective way to prevent HIV and STDs.
PrEP is used by people with high risk to prevent HIV infection.
