Hi Doctor...Please answer my concerns...Thanks!!!
I had a
moleBirthmarks - pigmented
Gestational trophoblastic disease
Hydatidiform mole
Pth flat brown that was getting darker on one edge on my
hipHip joint replacement
Hip pain-butt area,then i noticed one more on the leg, which had hair in it but it had some darker
pigmentationHyperpigmentation 2
Hyperpigmentation w/malignancy
Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation - calf
Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation 2
Skin - abnormally dark or light in it, and i had that removed too. Then i had this old one right on the belt line, and nothing was wrong with it, so i had that one removed too, just for the hell of it. So 3
molesBirthmarks - pigmented
Gestational trophoblastic disease
Hydatidiform mole
Pth right?
So Biopsy Report #1 stated,
1.)inflamed lentiginous junctional
nevusBasal cell nevus syndrome - close-up of palm
Basal cell nevus syndrome - face and hand
Basal cell nevus syndrome - plantar pits
Birthmarks - pigmented
Hemangioma (the one on the calf)
2.)inflammed lentiginous
focalFocal neurological deficits spindle cell junctional nevus (associated architectural disorder and focally mild cytologic atypia). (this was the one on the belt line, it looked fine though)
3.) The one on the butt i lost...but my doctor said it was a regular mole
Then i saw another doctor who is only a Mole doctor Specialist, and works at a Cancer Institute and is involved in Melanoma Research, and he didnt like that pathologist and sent these slides to another pathologist who is an expert in the field and who only deals with Moles and has been for 25 years 8 hours a day, 7 days a week, and who does research on moles.
His interpretation...
1.)Solar Lentigo with focal melanocytic hyperplasia (the one on the calf)
2.)Solar Lentigo with focal melanocytic hyperplasia (the one on the hip-butt)
3.)Junctional nevus with Minimal atypia, lentiginous type. (belt line one)
If you can please address these issues that are on my mind, i would appreciate it.
Derm said with old moles, the cells become spindle like over a long time. And spindle cells are common in the skin, and thats normal. He said everything is benign. He said on a scale of
1 - 10 (being the worst), he said my moles were like 2-3.
I toyed with the one on the belt line a lot before i got it taken off, and I'm guessing that with the friction of the belt caused focally minor atypia (doctor agreed). Although research shows that most benign (not atypical) moles have mild atypia in it.
Question...how can I get a Solar Lentigo on a sun-covered area?
What do these results really mean???
All the doctor said was that this is a good report and that he told me the first patho was not good at reading moles too well.
So, say we go by Path report #2, are these atypical moles? I've read that hyperplasia is present usually in Solar Lentigos? And the Minimal atypia that was present in the One mole
was only focally, and research shows that there is some mild cytologic atypia in even benign (clinically) moles.
I dont have many moles, hardly any on my body, just a few on the face and a few in the genital area, both of the 2 solar lentigos were in places where i scratch a lot and im sure i could
have had some trauma in the past, the Derm told me that could have caused some Melanocytes to come up to higher layers of the skin and cause pigmentation to be more darker. What are your
thoughts?
So are they Atypical or Benign?
Thanks. always.
Well its not that I dont trust them, its just that my questions never get answered. Its partly my fault, because I have so many questions.
Like what caused the varying degrees of pigmentation?
Thanks again.
Dr. Rockoff
Thanks a bunch!!!
thanks.