I first noticed a small lesion on my nose at the start of 2001. I thought nothing of it till mid 2007 when, out of vanity I decided to get it dealt with. It was about 2 mm, circular, and slightly raised. Like a very small redish blister. In truth, almost undetectable.
I went to my doctor who said the best thing to do was to just shave the top of it off 'because we don't want to put a hole in your nose' or words to that effect. 2 weeks later I was seen by another doctor who was going to remove it, and to my great surprise he said that it was a small skin cancer - a BCC. This was suprising for 2 reasons. 1. The previous doctor had never mentioned it and 2. I had had it for over 6 1/2 years and it had not grown/changed shape at all - (localised growth being a fundamental trait of a BCC I later discovered).
Anyway, he cut it out and it was not until I had the stiches removed that, to my horror, I realised he had done a punch biopsy (which I never agreed to). I thought he would just be taking the top off it, as per the original suggestion from the Doctor I had first seen. In fact he had removed an area probably 3 times the size of it, and cut down underneath it as well, leaving me with a sunken scar which is very noticeable in bright light.
The biopsy report later confirmed what I suspected. It was harmless and not cancerous in any way.
My question therefore is this:
Given that the lesion had exhibited absolutely no growth or alteration in over 6 years, remaining at no more than 2 mm across, was the Doctor right to think it was a BCC and then to cut it out?
As I now have a scar that I have to live with I am considering taking this further as I feel his misdiagnosis was negligent.
Biopsy to rule out a basal cell is usually done by a superficial shave biopsy or by scooping a small amount of tissue with an instrument called a curette. A punch is not generally necessary. When you say the biopsy "was harmless and not cancerous in any way," what did it show? A mole? If it did show a basal cell, then it is necessary to take more skin around it to make sure it doesn't come back. Basal cells do grow slowly, but over 6+ years it should have grown more.
I advise you to get copies of the biopsy reports and consult another dermatologist in person. Maybe the best one to consult is the first one, who wanted to do a shave biopsy.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. MedHelp is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.