Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
 | 

Blood Glucose Testers

by TonyAlmeida, Nov 19, 2003 12:00AM
Okay - I was happy with my One Touch Ultra.  Yes, it failed to pipe up enough blood sometimes resulting in a wasted strip.  Yes, the 1 mu thing is a marketing gimmick since it still wants 3 mu of blood or the strip won't fill and you get an error.

But - I learned its qwirks and got used to it.

Now my mail order prescription company my healthcare provider goes through has made the decision that LifeScan and it's products are non-formulary and do not qualify for a copay anymore and are not a preferred company. Instead, they told us to call them and get a new free Accu-Chek Compact blood tester whose strips are covered (this year).

Is the Accu-Chek Compact brand by Roche any better or worse than One Touch Ultra?  It looks almost twice the size and heavier.  And uses a drum-strip dispensing device that holds 17 strips - way too automated for my taste (too much to go wrong).  Has anyone had any experience with these or the Accu-Chek Softclix lancing device?

by JDRF-Team-sgg, Nov 19, 2003 12:00AM
I personally use the Accu-chek Softclix lancing device and find that it works well for me. I had to work with the settings to get the setting that gives me a good drop of blood without going too deep, though, and you will have to do the same. Any new system will take some adjustment. As for the Accu-chek Compact, I personnally don't know about that particular glucose monitor. However, I use the Accu-chek Advantage and am happy with it. I have compared its results to lab blood tests, and find that the results are very accurate. The Advantage does not use a drum dispenser, but uses the one-strip at a time system that allows the user to replace a strip quickly if a test goes wrong. You may want to check to see if your insurance company will cover this one if you do not wish to use the automatic dispenser system. The government health care system used by military dependents covers the Accu-chek Advantage, so I feel confident that most insurance companies would also cover it.  You might want to check the Accu-chek website to see what other styles of Accu-check monitors are available and then contact your insurance company to see if one that you like is covered (https://secure.ndpharmacy.com/diabeticsupplies.htm#Accu-chek).
Member Comments (2)

by me1212, Jan 01, 2004 12:00AM
I have tried the Accu-chek compact.  It is really not that great.  It takes more blood than the Ultra and the test takes longer.  It is also bigger and heavier like you said.  The SOftclix device is great.  I have also tried the Accu-chek active.  This requires a smaller amount of blood, is lighter, has a canister of strips (not a drum), and is faster.  The strips are pretty different from the Ultra and will take some getting used to.
Post Comment
To
Comment
Post Comment
Recent Activity
ambitious is in vacation
airannie commented on I don't get my Mother...
Nov 28
peggy64 commented on I don't get my Mother...
Nov 28
Angeleyes1015 commented on I don't get my Mother...
Nov 28
Why don't anyone care?
Nov 28 by laydeechaz
anaban joined this community
Welcome them!
Nov 28
towhid commented on photo
Nov 28
towhid commented on photo
Nov 28
RSS Expert Activity
Prevention Gains Momentum: Your Gui... 
Nov 29 by Lee Kirksey, MD
What You Don't Know About Breathing...
Nov 24 by Steven Y Park, MD
Thanksgiving
Nov 23 by Thomas Dock, Vet. Technician
Community Members