okay there are differing opinions on this, but i will give you mine.
your child needs glasses. astigmatism over -2.00 diopters is generally agreed to be an "amblyogenic" prescription, meaning that if he does NOT wear glasses, his
retinalFluorescein angiography
Retinal artery occlusion
Retinal detachment
Retinal detachment repair
Retinal dye injection and
visualVisual acuity test development may not occur like its supposed to. thats called "
amblyopiaAmblyopia", and the longer he goes w/o glasses, the worse it usually gets, and the less likely he will see well later, even if you get glasses for him at a later time. there's a "critical period" of visual development...and if he is not seeing clearly suring that critical period, then he never will, no matter how "strong" the glasses are later. google & research "refractive amblyopia".
some kids "grow out of" astigmatism...but not -3.50 diopters of astigmatism. he wont grow out of that.
-3.50 diopters equates to about 20/200 or so vision. not very good. biut regardless...even if he sees well now, no guarantee he will see well later. he needs full time glasses wear.
this is not "curable". not like you're thinking of. glasses fixes the vision and the visual development, but not the problem. when he removes the glasses he will still see poorly and have astigmatism. there are sureries to reduce or eliminate astigmatism, but they are not performed on children. in the U.S. a person must be 18 to have corneal refractive surgery.
no, this is not "unique".
do's & donts: DO get glasses for him and make him wear them all the time. DONT wait much longer.