Nutrition Health Chat: Tuesday, Dec. 8th, 5-6 PM Eastern. Learn how vitamins, minerals, and phytonutrients affect your health. Free live Q&A. Join us!
Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
 | 

IOL Exchange

by blake9950, Dec 17, 2007 11:10AM
I had a cataract removed from my left eye on August 14, implanted with Alcon AcrySof IQ (SN60WF) 14.5 D, and ended up hyperopic (+1.00 D). Right eye has no cataract and is myopic (-2.25 D). The power difference causes some peripheral double vision when wearing glasses. Also, left eye should not be hyperopic because it is my non-dominant eye. YAG treatment has not been necessary. I am 57 years old. I prefer to avoid piggyback lens and Lasik options, but was considering IOL exchange.

1. Is IOL exchange extraordinarily risky compared to benefits that could be achieved? What serious complications could happen? Is risk of retinal detachment higher than for original surgery?
2. Would it be harder to get proper centration and alignment of the replacement IOL, compared to the original?
3. I have no astigmatism now. Could the IOL exchange operation produce astigmatism?
4. Can my regular eye surgeon do this procedure safely, or do I need to find someone with special expertise?
5. If I have to locate another surgeon, is it critical to act fast? Could I delay IOL exchange up to a year since original implant?

I am very anxious about this, and will be grateful for any information you can provide.
Member Comments (3)

by John C Hagan III, MD, FACS, Dec 17, 2007 12:49PM
1. Piggy back IOL would be less risky than IOL exchange. Complications include infection, bleeding, tearing the posterior capsule, vitreous loss, retinal detachment and rarely inability to insert a second IOL. RD risks would probably be the same if the IOL can be exchanged without capsular tear and vitreous loss.
2. Yes
3. yes
4. Ask him. Some have done it a lot, some infrequently, some never. Obivously the latter might not be a good choice.
5. No further delay should not jeoporzide success.

6. other options would include hyperoic LASIK,  conductive keratoplasty.

JCH III MD

by blake9950, Dec 17, 2007 01:22PM
To: John C Hagan III, MD, FACS
Many thanks for your prompt and helpful answers. It sounds like the risks of IOL exchange may not be worth the potential benefits. I will explore the other options you mentioned.

by John C Hagan III, MD, FACS, Dec 17, 2007 04:54PM
----------------------------
Related discussions
Post Comment
To
Comment
Post Comment
Recent Activity
slcervantes added the Exercise Tracker
20 mins ago
slcervantes uploaded a new photo
1 hr ago
nissah46 commented on photo
2 hrs ago
iris986 commented on photo
2 hrs ago
nissah46 commented on photo
2 hrs ago
margypops commented on The Olden Days
3 hrs ago
April2 commented on Mother !@#$$%
4 hrs ago
jimi1822 commented on The Olden Days
6 hrs ago
RSS Expert Activity
What You Can Learn From Tiger Woods...
Dec 04 by Steven Y Park, MD
When the Mexican Drug Trade Hits th...
Dec 03 by Arnold L Goldman, D.V.M.
In the ER: Coffee, anyone?
Dec 02 by Jon Geller, D.V.M.
Community Members