I have read a lot of the past threads and am only more confused than ever. The worst problem I have had with mine--placed in July 2010--is the blurry vision--ghosting--waxy vision--whatever it is called. Well, I am disappointed with having lost my good close-up vision because I was under the impression that this multifocal lens would solve pretty much all of my problems, not make them worse. However, I understand that if I had these taken out and monofocals put in that my close-up vision would be worse than it is now, and that is simply not acceptable to me.
If I decide I can live with the blurry distance vision, I could have the YAG procedure--which my doctor thinks will solve the blurry vision problem--but is there a chance that this lens is basically defective and could result in even worse problems later on? Is the only other option having the monofocals put in and having to live with worse close-up vision AND having to go back to wearing glasses for distance (and still paying the $4000 for the defective Restors, not to mention whatever costs the insurance company won't pay for)?
It goes without saying that I wish I had never had this surgery at all. I didn't hate wearing glasses, and I didn't have much of a cataracts problem either. I feel that my doctor rushed me into this, and I don't trust him to tell me the truth because I'm sure he is wary of some sort of lawsuit. I actually do not want to sue anyone; I just want someone to help me decide what to do. This is such a nightmare.