LASIK Surgery Health Chat: Tuesday, December 15th 5:00-6:00 PM Eastern. Free live Q&A with Dr. Omar E Awad. Ask your question in advance!
Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
 | 

Scleroplasty aka Scleral reinforcement

by Nimbydimby, Oct 27, 2009 10:49AM
I'd like to know what is the general view of this procedure in the USA. There are studies on the web suggesting beneficial effects in most cases eg http://www.bmj.sk/2001/10202-03.PDF

Thank you.



This discussion is related to Is scleral reinforcement performed in the US?.
Member Comments (6)

by John C Hagan III, MD, FACS, Oct 27, 2009 01:15PM
If you are talking about scleral reinformcement to prevent progression of pathologic myopia its not considered a standard treatment and is controversial. It has been discussed at length. You can use the search and archive features to read these informative discussion

JCH MD

by nickppatel, Oct 27, 2009 02:57PM
To: Dr. John C Hagan
Dr Hagan:

If you're talking about posterior pole buckling - what's the controversy?  Are there doctors who dispute its efficacy/safety?  Any links?

Thanks.

by John C Hagan III, MD, FACS, Oct 27, 2009 04:04PM
Yes scleral buckling posteriorly for pathologic myopia is controversial because its never been proven to work. Use the search and arachives on this page to research futher. There are many detailed discussions with references.

JCH MD

by nickppatel, Oct 27, 2009 05:15PM
To: Dr. Hagan
I've been following the detailed discussions on this topic, which is why I'm surprised that you say that.  Dr. Brian Ward published a paper showing posterior pole buckling's efficacy and safety over a 5-year period in EYE in the UK.  So while I understand there was some debate over traditional scleral buckling in the past, this seems to be proof that posterior pole buckling actually works to arrest myopic progression in pathologic myopia.  Do you disagree (not trying to argue, just trying to nail down why anyone would dispute Dr. Ward's results)?

Thanks

by John C Hagan III, MD, FACS, Oct 27, 2009 10:09PM
I do not have extensive experience with the procedure. When I ask my consultants that are experts (retino-vitreal surgeons) they do not think its helpful.

JCH MD

by nickppatel, Oct 27, 2009 11:09PM
To: Dr. Hagan
Well, I can't imagine that anyone has a lot of experience with it besides Dr. Ward, since he pioneered it and has at least one patent on the buckles he uses.  And I can't imagine how the consultants would know, either, since the only posterior pole buckle surgeries (of which I'm aware) are the ones Dr. Ward and his team have performed.  The results of those were positive.  Perhaps the consultants are mistaking PPB for traditional scleral buckles.....
Related discussions
Post Comment
To
Comment
Post Comment
Recent Activity
Skippys commented on Silly Songs With Larr...
5 hrs ago
April2 commented on Silly Songs With Larr...
6 hrs ago
chantal21 commented on photo
8 hrs ago
chantal21 commented on photo
9 hrs ago
jollyman069 commented on Teen girls having bab...
11 hrs ago
iris986 happy
Anxiety/Panic Tracker: Another day
11 hrs ago by dloflinpringle
AHP84 commented on Teen girls having bab...
11 hrs ago
RSS Expert Activity
Simple tool to Assess your Risk for...
11 hrs ago by Lee Kirksey, MD
Premium IOLs have a disproportionat...
Dec 13 by John C Hagan III, MD, FACS
EyeNet Article about MedHelp.com Ey...
Dec 13 by John C Hagan III, MD, FACS
Community Members