This is not really a question, but an observation. I found this website to be very helpful when I recently had a vitrectomy for a macular hole. However, when I had a period of time with severely blurred vision, I had a few questions that were not answered on any website. The following paragraphs describe the four weeks following my vitrectomy. I have been told that each person's recovery might be slightly different, but I am doing this just to provide a source of information to someone who might be undergoing a similar procedure. (I must note that I am 58 years old and never have worn glasses, so my entire recovery described below was done without any corrective lenses.)
Week 1 - I had my vitrectomy on a Monday. The procedure was only 45 minutes. I was taken to the operating room at 8:30 am, and was on my way home before noon. I had gone to the website http://www.kellycomfort.net/vitrectomy/ and rented equipment to help me remain the face-down position. I found this very beneficial. (There are a number of other websites that offer similar equipment.) The morning after the surgery I returned to the doctor's office, (my wife was my chauffeur), and they removed the bandage. When they tested my eyesight the vision in my affected eye was a large opaque circle, which was the gas bubble. During the first week the bubble diminished in size and my vision actually got worse. The first day I could see very vague images through the bubble, but when the bubble began to shrink, I saw red on the perimeter of the shrinking circle, and images became almost indistinguishable. I discovered later that the red color was post-operative bleeding inside the eye. (The more the bubble shrank, the worse the vision got.) The first week after the operation I used the protective shield that I was given to protect the eye, but only at night when sleeping. During the week I was able to eat my meals, watch TV, work on my laptop computer, and do crossword and Sudoku puzzles, all in a face-down position. The only activities that weren't completely face-down were brushing teeth, shaving and showering. (My doctor said I was permitted to do these activities.)
Week 2 - I went to the surgeon eight days after the surgery. The bubble inside the eye was about 60% of the original size and my vision was actually worse than the day after the surgery. When the doctor looked at my retina he could not see if the hole had been closed because of post-operative bleeding inside the eye. The doctor told me that my condition was "normal" and that I could not expect to see much at this point in time. I was also told that I could return to an upright position, but still was on a schedule of minimal activity. During the second week I was able to take the dog for his daily walks, go to a friends house for a 4th of July celebration, and attend a wedding and reception. (I did dance with my wife, but only slow dances.) My eyesight still was nonexistent in the affected eye for the entire week and I could only see opaque images. I must admit that the first two weeks were very difficult for me, and I would consider myself as usually optimistic.
Weeks 3 and 4 - The morning of the 14th day after the surgery my bubble was totally gone, and I returned to the surgeon on the 17th day after the procedure. Once again he could not see if the macular hole had been sealed because of the blood in the eye. The good news was that I was allowed to return to a full schedule of activity. My vision had improved very slightly from the week before, and the opaque images were still indistinguishable. The good news here is that once I was able to return to my normal activities, I was able to notice slight improvements on an almost daily basis. I was able to begin driving, and did not feel that my depth perception was affected too severely, but I did drive a little slower and more cautiously. I went golfing, walking 9 holes the first two times and 18 after that. (I did have some depth perception problems here, not knowing how high to tee the ball, so I hit most of my drives with and iron or hybrid with minimal tee height.) My personal observation was that when I put in a full day of work, the eye would definitely show improvements the following morning. I also was able to view an Amsler grid during week 4, and did not see the wavy lines that I had experienced when the macular hole was discovered.
My next visit to the surgeon came on the 31st day following the vitrectomy, and I am happy to report that I was able to see the top 5-6 lines on the eye chart. The surgeon also said that the macular hole had successfully been sealed. He also said that the retina would take 8 to 9 months to completely heal and for the blood to be absorbed into my system. For this period of time I should expect some glare an distortion, but my eyesight should continue to improve. Following that I can expect to have a cataract develop, but once that is corrected, I should have normal eyesight.
Best wishes to anyone who has a macular hole and needs a vitrectomy. I can only say that right now, for me, while the first two weeks were difficult, the long term prognosis is very encouraging.
Thanks for a very meaningful post, which will also be very encouraging to those with macular holes. I am very happy that you had a positive outcome.
I am so glad you could prepare, and that your wife could support and assist you. The more we share about preparation and support, it will help others deal with this type of surgery.
My retina surgeries were emergencies 4/5 times. My outcome was not so happy, due to probably unavoidable complications. I like to see others recover more successfully. You show the other forum members that it is possible, even though great care must be taken.
I wish that your questions could have been answered.
Copyright 1994-2016 MedHelp International. All rights reserved.
MedHelp is a division of Aptus Health.
This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. Med Help International, Inc. is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.