hi i have recently had iol lense exchange but my right eye is not what i was expecting so in laymans turms could you explain to me how the optometrist calculates the lense power needed
kind regards wayne
Measurements of the length of your eye and the curvature of your cornea are plugged into a complex formula. This usually provides a pretty close estimate of the correct IOL power for you. BTW, cataract surgeons are ophthalmologists with M.D.s. Optometrists generally limit their practice to prescribing glasses and contacts.
thanks for the reply jodie the reason i am curious about the calculations and formulas is i have had a tetraflex implant in both eyes and i was prescribed and fitted a 34 in my left eye and a 32 in my right eye (my left being the worst) i would like to know why fit a different power lens in each eye as i have been wearing contact lenses for years and for the last 5 years the prescription has been the same in both eyes so its making me wonder if i would benafit from a 34 in both eyes ?
Your IOL power is not always consistent with your prescription. I used a different power lens in each eye, although my pre-surgery prescription was the same in both. The formulas used for the calculations don't always work perfectly. You might want to discuss your particular situation with your doctor if you're not satisfied with your outcome. Possibly a LASIK touch-up would improve your vision.
If you had a 32 or 34 power implant - then you must have been very, very farsighted - perhpaps a +7 or +8. Because your measurements are so far off the norm (much more than 2 standard deviations) there is a much greater chance of having a refractive surprise. Now if you just had an IOL exchange, the chances should be a litte better because you arlready know exactly how far off you are from the first surgery - so the second surgery should be just a refinement of 1 or 2 or 3 diopters. It is common for eyes to be a little different and actually, your eyes are rather closes. If you could keep refractive error within 1 or 2 diopters of plano that would be an excellent result considering your startig point. Probably not a great tetraflex candidate because that choice in itself is giving you the idea that you will see well without glasses and because your calculations are so difficult - there is a fairly high chance that you WILL might glasses anyway - so why go with an accommodating type implant anyway? It's hard enough to make you happy even with a monofocal implant -much less take on the possible new challanges of an accommodating implant.
in all respect MJK that explanation was way above my head you obviously know what your talking about but all i am is a rolls royce engineer and knot a MD, my original prescription of contact lens was +5 in both eyes thats why i cant understand why they have put a 34 in my left and a 32 in my right eye in layman's terms what questions do i need to be asking and how will i know if they are bull shitting my
very kind regards wayne
Calculating IOL power is not an exact science. I think that Dr. Kutryb was suggesting that the available formulas don't work as well for people (like you and me) who are severely nearsighted/farsighted/astigmatic. (I had three excellent surgeons tell me that I'd probably need glasses/contacts for most activities post-surgery.)
Dr. Kutryb also suggested that based on the results of the surgery on your first eye, the calculations for your second eye might be modified slightly to get closer to your target. Perhaps this is why the IOL powers in each of your eyes is different. (Do you have better vision from the eye that was done second?) It's also true that your IOL power is not necessarily consistent with your contact lens prescription. For example, lenticular astigmatism would effect your contact lens prescription but not the power of your IOL.
With a premium lens like the Tetraflex, it natural to expect to see well without glasses. (After all, you paid good money for the "premium" lens.) The question I'd be asking in your place is whether a laser vision touch-up would improve my vision. In the US, some surgeons include the cost of a "touch-up" procedure in the premium lens. surcharge.
hi again jodiej thanks for your response my optometrist has already said that they will preform corrective laser surgery to finish my treatment within the price but i just wondered what the outcome would of been if they put a 34 in both eyes
They say hindsight is 20/20--maybe a 34 in both eyes would have been better. But as Dr. Kutryb stated, the formulas they use to calculate IOL power are less reliable with significant deviations from plano. Let us know how you like the Tetraflex after your touch-up. It's not available yet in the US, but I've seen promising reports about its success.
i have my next check up next Wednesday so very soon after then i should have my correction laser treatment and yes i will let you know how it goes thanks jodie for your interest
very cool regards wayne
hi jodie i know its been a long time coming but i had my correction laser surgery three weeks ago its got rid of the double vision but im now left with everything being blurred so now i think i am having to have another top up surgery but i dont know what sort laser or a new implant ?????? ill let you know xxxxx
hay jodiej its me again i just thought id let you know after all the hastle iv had i asked the optometrist to diolate my pupil so he could see all the implant and guess what, yes you got itit was not inserted right so iv had to go 8 months with blurred vision they said i had a stigmatime so they lasered me and now they have found the implant has not unfolded all the way out so now iv got to under go surgery again to habe that removed and a new one fitted what you you think to that load of **** i am totally with ultralases surgens
Copyright 1994-2016 MedHelp International. All rights reserved.
MedHelp is a division of Aptus Health.
This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. Med Help International, Inc. is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.