Welcome to the Gallbladder Forum! This is a place to ask your personal questions about gallbladder issues and receive personal answers from medical experts. You will also find other members who share your interest in the subject of gallbladders.
My GB was removed 02/15/13 , no stones GB working @ 30%, using the Da Vinci robot. On 02/17 ER with pain that felt like the start of heartburn, but went around abdom to my back. Told it was gas pain from surgery & sent home. I've had 3 C-Sections & didn't think that was it.
02/16 EMA took me to ER with severe pain & shortness of breath. Received 3 morph shots in probably 30 min & it didn't ease any pain. The pain attacks were very sporadic in how often it happened & how long. I was transported twice to a larger hospital where my surgeon was located. Discharged after 2 days again this time for gas & constipation. I don't know how many CT or HIDA scans I had, but was told nothing showed. I think something was said about my liver enzy being high. I continued having the pain, breathing worse, high BP, & needed husband to move me.
Finally, on 02/22 a CT showed fluid in my abdom. A stint was done that night by a different surgeon. The 23rd I had 2 JP tubes, one in lower left stomach & below chest bone. Discharged the 27th with only the tube @ my chest. Other was just removed on the 19th.
The GB surgeon said there must have been a duct cut that he didn't see, & that he's still not sure of where it was leaking. Why would it take so long for the fluid to show on tests? Why would the leak cause so much pain?
It sounds like a difficult situation. The HIDA scan is the standard method to identify a bile leak after cholecystectomy. Although it is very sensitive it is not perfect. What was the sales pitch to use the robot for this straightforward laparoscopic case?
As a surgeon, I have not embraced the concept of single incision gallbladder surgery. Generally, the robotic approach is "marketed" as being an improvement on the single incision approach. In other words, one incision is put in the belly button and an inch and a half plug stuffed through the hole. It is beyond me how these patients are then told that they can resume normal activity immediately since they have "only" had laparoscopic surgery. This is a real incision. I have performed over 5000 laparoscopic procedures each with 3 or four small holes and have seen 4 trocar site hernias. I have repaired far more than that in patients having single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) by other local surgeons. To a general surgeon, gallbladder surgery is probably the highest liability procedure we do. Why would anyone want to make it more difficult for the minimal change in tiny incisions?
Copyright 1994-2016 MedHelp International. All rights reserved.
MedHelp is a division of Aptus Health.
This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. Med Help International, Inc. is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.