Asian/M/high 40s
During a
routineRoutine sputum culture physical exam, the ultrasound technician found 3-4 echogenic and well circumferential masses at the right lobe of the liver. The biggest one is about 4x4x4 cm in size at the
posteriorAnterior vaginal wall repair
Posterior fossa tumor
Posterior heart arteries
Posterior spinal anatomy
Skeleton (posterior view)
Spinal fusion
Uveitis
Vertebrobasilar circulatory disorders. The technician indicated that additional diagnosis(such as CT scan) may be required, and asked me to speak to my personal physician. My personal physician said they are liver
hemangiomasBirthmarks - red
Hemangioma
Hemangioma - angiogram
Hemangioma - ct scan
Hemangioma excision
Hemangioma on the chin
Hemangioma on the face (nose)
Hepatic hemangioma, asked some questions regarding my medical history, and requested me to come back in three months for a follow-up ultrasound exam.
However, a few days later, after I asked how certain these masses are actually liver
hemangiomasBirthmarks - red
Hemangioma
Hemangioma - angiogram
Hemangioma - ct scan
Hemangioma excision
Hemangioma on the chin
Hemangioma on the face (nose)
Hepatic hemangioma, my personal physician referred me to a CT scan. My questions are:
1) Is CT scan a preferred (or required) step in handling a case similar to mine?
2) CT scan has its inherited risk because it uses a much higher dosage of
radiationCystitis - noninfectious
Radiation therapy when compared to a
normalNormal saline flush x-ray procedure. Does the benefit of taking a CT scan exceed the risk in my case even though my personal physician did not recommend CT initially?
3) Since my personal physician did not recommend CT initially, and the main reason for the CT referral several days later was because I asked additional questions, should I go ahead to take the CT scan?
4) How effective is MRI in diagnosing liver hemangioma? Although it may be more expensive, can I ask my personal physician to gave me an MRI referral instead?