There can be many diseases that can
leadLead poisoning to your symptoms.
However, if the LFTs, ultrasound and CT scan are all
normalNormal saline flush, it is unlikely that liver disease is present. You can continue to further evaluate the gallbladder with a HIDA scan to
completeComplete
Complete a-z
Complete allergy
Complete natal
Complete premium
Complete senior
Complete-rf the evaluation.
The dizziness can be evaluated via neurology evaluation and possible brain imaging. Nausea can be initially evaluated with an upper GI series and/or upper endoscopy.
These options can be discussed with your personal physician.
Followup with your personal physician is
essentialEssential balance
Essential hypertension
Essential tremor.
This answer is not intended as and does not substitute for medical advice - the information presented is for patient education only. Please see your personal physician for further evaluation of your individual case.
Kevin, M.D.
kevinmd_
nausea
Linda J
The spider nevi are a sign of liver issues too as are all the symptoms you mention including the nausea.
good luck, hope you find out soon what is going on.
How were your platelets?
I'd say she needs to get the unusual vaginal bleeding evaluated by a good gyne. But, to jump to a liver biopsy based on what she posted is overkill.
Linda J
It is not good to judge by enzymes alone to determine a liver issue especially when the person is symptomatic like she is and to suggest that if her enzymes arent elevated nothing is wrong with her liver is not correct, enzymes do not tell the whole story.
My vag. bleeding was one of the things that threw the docs off the scent thinking it was a gyn issue, in the end after many months of sickness I finally saw a gastro who put it together right away.
I know that the symptoms could be indicative of something else entirely, I just hope she gets to a specialist and gets some answers.
The spider nevi are a big tip off to it being liver related and you can also have a liver issue that can aggravate the gallbladder, they can go hand in hand so she should have both investigated. Many people with Hep develop gallbladder problems.
Didn't mean to be alarmist when I mentioned a biopsy, but many people think all is "ok" because they have a clear untrasound or CT scan and with liver problems, that just isn't the case, they can't see fibrosis or cirrhosis with those tests.
They don't tell the patient that little fact and the patient might have a false sense the liver is fine when it is not.
Linda J
Linda J
No offense, but you should read through more thoroughly before you go off accusing people of trying to diagnose someone which I certainly did not do. A gyn might help her with that one issue, what about all the other ssymptoms she mentions? You would just ignore those and suggest she just see a gyn for vaginal bleeding? I say she needs more extensive testing and to see a Gastro too.
Many people dont know they have a liver issue until it is advanced so she is smart to check it out.
Again, with normal scans and normal LTF's it is UNLIKELY she has liver disease. You seem to not want to address that.
LInda J.
It is typically end stage cirrhosis that presents with normal liver enzymes. By that time the patient is exhibiting other symptoms like jaundice and ascites.
Were you diagnosed with cirrhosis after normal LFT's and ultrasound?
Linda J.
I also had the Xray office send me a copy of my report. In my report it states that there is a 4mm lesion on the left lobe of the liver, the etiology is unclear, possibly a hemangioma. Also states that there is mild ectasia of the bile duct which can be seen post cholecystectomy. At the conclusion it states Indeterminate lesion in the liver. Is this all normal, don't I require follow-up? Why would surgeon who performed cholecystectomy say that my results were normal. I am confused.
Meanwhile I have to live with the daily on and off sharp and sometimes crampy pani and several episodes of nausea EVERY DAY.
Any feedback?
I also had my GB out and have more problems, if you want to
e-mail me ***@****
Again sorry that we posted our own thread. Also to the original
poster, Why not just seek a 2nd opinion with a hematologist, just to put your mind at ease!
And regarding your doctors telling you you are fine and everything is rosy, unless she has a crystal ball she can't say with any certainty that you definately have no liver scarring.
Here, if you don't believe me, maybe you will believe experts on the subject:
"The onset of cirrhosis is usually silent, with few specific symptoms to identify this development in the liver. As scarring (fibrosis) and destruction continue, some of the following signs and symptoms may occur: loss of appetite, nausea and/or vomiting, weight loss, change in liver size, gallstones, itching, and jaundice. However, a large number of people live many, many years with cirrhosis without any decompensation or symptoms."
The big money goes into the CT scan costs I guess but a CT scan isn't the best tool for liver evaluation and in my view is a waste of money unless there was a specific reason, a suspected growth or something. Did you have symptoms to warrant the evaluation? If you needed an evaluation of your liver, why wouldn't you see a Heptologist and not a Gastro? Believe what you want but the truth is what I stated and even WITH a biopsy you can be cirrhotic in one area of your liver and fine in another, so even a biopsy is not telling the entire story.
The only way to examine the whole liver is an autopsy and I doubt you have had one of those.
You accused me of "diagnosing" someone here, that is why I was "touchy" you should watch what you say. You are the one who is telling her she is fine in SPITE of her symptoms and she has quite a few symptoms she is coping with,so clearly she isn't "fine" she needs to be tested for Hepatitis, all types of it and she needs to get to the bottom of her symptoms.
but if you had cirrhosis your symptoms would be alot worse.
But i have a question for you two. I have normal lft and had a normal cat scan last month. I also had a biopsy that showed
last year that reads minimal fibrosis, slight portal tract imflammion, and slight fatty liver, with moderate iron present.
After the biopsy i was on meds trazadone and clonapine for 3 months and took them both everyday. I was a heavy drinker for 20 years. Now i have all they symptoms of cirrhosis- stomach bloats,
red palms, weight loss, confused, loss of appitite, private parts shrunk, also severe dry mouth. Ive been back to 2 gastros and my primary doctor. They look at my biopsy and say yes it shows damage but not severe. I tell them that i think the meds i was no made my liver worse they all do not agree with me because my lft and cat scan came back normal last month. I have the history of drinking and then the meds i took. I had alot of symptoms before the biopsy mostly weight loss. First you mentioned the biopsy can be wrong as far a what piece of liver they took. I think my damage was worse to start with. It seems the gastro and primary doctors do not know everything about the liver. I ask some qustions and they do not know. I have and appointed with a hepatoligist in 2 months. They tell me this doctor just does the liver and also deals with transplants.
Do you think he is my best bet to see. What test should i ask for . Someone mentioned a test that tells how the whole liver is doing not just a little piece. Also when i got my first symptoms my lft were sky high. They are normal now that i dont drink.
Are their better blood test to get. Thanks
You can live a long life even if your liver has sustained some permanent damage so try not to worry too much. Anxiety can cause many symptoms even physical ones so you might want to address your anxiety if you worry far too much about it. You stop the behaviors that are causing the liver problem and you are on the right track.
I wouldn't assume the meds you took have damaged your liver unless you have some evidence that is true, you didn't take them very long and you don't take them now so I wouldn't worry.
When my syptoms (symptoms) started i drank more to get rid of them. But then it all hit me and one day and i had to quit as i thought my liver was shutting down. Its been 15 months no drinking but my symptoms are getting worse. Another question is , i had my biopsy only 6 months after i quit drinking, i thought i read that it can take 2 years to see exactly how much damage you have done to show up . You also said one piece of the liver may be damage more than the other. How can the doctors tell this. Yes you are correct you can have cirrhosis with no symptoms. Thanks again. Do you have liver problems or just know the subject.
There are limitations to any medical test, most only have a degree of medical certainty, nothing is absolute but docs can tell a lot by various indicators in your blood, how you look, etc. Clean living will ensure your liver stays healthy.
If you dont drink now, forgive yourself your past behavior and enjoy your improved lifestyle.
In science, short of an autopsy, there is no perfect info. Sometimes you just have to rely on the best info you have and weigh the risks and advantages.
Linda J
"There can be many diseases that can lead to your symptoms.
However, if the LFTs, ultrasound and CT scan are all normal, it is unlikely that liver disease is present"
You see he says it is UNLIKELY liver disease is present when the above tests are normal. No one said it wasn't possible. But, UNLIKELY is the key word that you keep missing.
Linda J
I think it takes a lot less that what you stated initially which was " I spent 3,000 to have my liver evaluated" and that seems very high to me, now it seems you aren't sure how much you spent, now you have said it costs 2,300 in one instance, and 2,00 in another instance so even you dont seem to know how much you paid. I had my liver "evaluated" and it cost one fraction of that . I don't want people to be scared away from having their livers checked out thinking it is very expensive, it normally isn't. I had the tests you mentioned too, ANA and AFP tests can be done with a blood draw so I don't get the enormous costs you paid. Who am I to judge? You put it out there and I responded, this is a forum that is what is done here.
I am far from a pessimist but it is important people understand there can be liver problems with NO symptoms and for some reason that fact bothers you. This whole thing wasn't about YOU so don't try to make it about you and your health, if you want to discuss something post a question but don't take up Katheen's thread with your health issues.Kathleen is the one who is suffering with undiagnosed symptoms.
I'd think you'd be happy your cyst was resolved and your liver was fine, I have had lumps taken out and they turned out to be nothing, I hope the same is true of you. Maybe you should be evaualuted for anxiety, that can cause symptoms too.
So far you have accused me of "diagnosing" someone online and called me names. I think you need to be more careful of the things you say to people. I won't respond to you again you seem to want to argue for no reason.
The way i look at it is when you drink alot you get dry mouth in the morning because you have done damage to your liver. Your liver than recovers. I think i have dry mouth all the time because my liver no longer can recover on its own. Does that make sense. I also sweat all the time. Is their a reason for that.
Thanks.
If you could read and comprehend you will see my responses did not start out about me. I responded several times directly to kathleen and her symptoms... until you began to argue the points I was making. I still maintain, her symptoms could be caused by lots of different things, other than liver. The doctor on the forum seems to agree with that. 'Nuff said.
Kathleen, best of luck and I hope you get to the bottom of your health problems.
Linda J.
That is just not true. The bloodwork for specific liver tests can be very costly. It is the genral liver panel that runs about $200-$300. It also depends on the part of the country you live in.
<< I had the tests you mentioned too, ANA and AFP tests can be done with a blood draw so I don't get the enormous costs you paid.
yes, so? Lots of tests done with a blood draw are expensive. Many labs don't do these specialized liver tests and they have to be sent out. Mine were done in California and I live in Chicago.
<< Who am I to judge? You put it out there and I responded, this is a forum that is what is done here.
I am far from a pessimist but it is important people understand there can be liver problems with NO symptoms and for some reason that fact bothers you.
doesn't bother me in the least. There are lots of diseases that have no symptoms. All you can do is get tested, trust your doc and go from there. It sounds like Kathleen is already doing that.
<<I'd think you'd be happy your cyst was resolved
I had a partial hysterectomy to "resolve" it. Guess I should be dancing in the aisles over that, huh?
<<and your liver was fine, I have had lumps taken out and they turned out to be nothing,
so have I, but I am sure you can understand it is an unsettling experience.
<<I hope the same is true of you. Maybe you should be evaualuted for anxiety, that can cause symptoms too.
Thanks for the kind words @@. I won't be responding to you further either.
Again to Kathleen, it sounds like she is getting evaluated and I wish her all the best.
Linda J
You passion is obvious but the reason you are frustrating is for comments like this.
"The big money goes into the CT scan costs I guess but a CT scan isn't the best tool for liver evaluation and in my view is a waste of money unless there was a specific reason, a suspected growth or something."
While it is true that the Ct is not the gold standard for the liver it is not a waste of money. You are not a doctor and you are misleading the original poster in your argument with Linda. Would not the Cat see an enlarged or shrunken liver? Would not the cat detect an enlarged spleen, another problem with cirrhosis? Would not the Cat scan detect free fluid in the ab(ascites)?
Using your logic, the original poster should not believe any tests that show a normal liver, including a biopsy, because they can biopsy the wrong part of the liver. I agree she should have a comprehesnive evaluation,that is fine, but at some point we have to trust the tests and the doctors, and live as healthy as possible day by day. There is really no other choice.
Linda J
I have all the symptoms but the biopsy showed minimal fibrosis.
Without another biopsy how can i tell if they did not get the piece of the liver that has cirrhosis. And because my liver function test are normal my doctors think im nuts. The liver function test is actually a misleading wording for a test. One would think that the liver is in great shape if those come back ok , but thats not the case. Im going to a hepatoligist instead of a gastro doctor. What test should i ask him for. He should know alot more that a gastro. Any info will help.Im not worried i have a liver problem, im worried because no doctor can tell me i have a problem.