Aa
A
A
Close
Avatar universal
ERCP versus EGD
having an unsedated EGD wasn't all that bad for me...but that was mostly due to the fact it only lasted about 5 minutes...it was a pretty intense 5 minutes......Can anyone relate this to ERCP?  I know the scope follows the same general path,  what are your experiences with ERCP if you have had one?  How long did it take and was it much worse than plain EGD aside from the fact that it took longer?
Cancel
2 Answers
Page 1 of 1
82861 tn?1333457511
Don't even THINK about having an ERCP without sedation.  The entire procedure is longer because the doc has to go beyond your stomach and into the duodenum to locate the opening of the common bile duct.  Then dye is run up the duct so it can be visualized under fluoroscopy.   It does take longer than a typical EGD.  If any doctor tells you that you can do this without sedation, I would advise you to run, and find another doctor.  

I had ERCP several years ago, and the sedation needed was a bit more than EGD according to the anesthesiologist.  In my case, they started with versed and demorol, and then to thorazine because I started to wake up.  I have a very vague memory of that and it was only for a few seconds.  
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Submit Comment
Avatar universal
I've had several ercp's the first 2  I had general anesthesia and the 3rd one I was just sedated.  Trust me you want the general.  The ercp is much more invasive than just and egd.
Comment
Cancel
Comment
Avatar universal
Comment
Comment
Submit Comment
Your Answer
Avatar universal
Answer
Know how to answer? Tap here to leave your answer...
Answer
Submit Answer
A
A
Blank
Weight Tracker
Weight Tracker
Start Tracking Now
Gastroenterology Community Resources
Top Digestive Answerers
Avatar m tn
Blank
fntn
MI
1340994 tn?1374197577
Blank
Caryopteris
Raleigh, NC
6543835 tn?1468847635
Blank
cnoevl21
NJ
Avatar m tn
Blank
me_just34
168348 tn?1379360675
Blank
ChitChatNine
1530171 tn?1448133193
Blank
TheLightSeeker
London, ON