This forum is for questions and discussions relating to HIV exposure and risks, living with HIV, HIV prevention, HIV testing, HIV transmission, HIV treatment. All questions will be answered by a medical expert from FreedomHealth.
I live in a Middle Eastern, where barring a few countries, there is no concept of STD clinics and definitely no anonymous testing. Hospitals are the only source of STD screening. In countries where STD clinics do exist, these clinics are run by Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO's) with funding / testing kids provided by private donors or the government itself.
At one of such clinics in one of these countries, I was told that the HIV rapid testing requires only a 4 week period (time from suspected encounter till testing), that the testing kits are for HIV1/2, and with 99% accuracy. These kits are provided to the clinic by the government therefore no clue who the manufacturer is. The staff at the clinic are quite professional and one of them even went to the extent saying that the research is in progress of making the rapid tests accuracy window less than 4 weeks.
I know and have read a lot on this site about the Rapid Tests Accuracy and the window period and I apologize if I have still missed a previous post on this site answering my question. I would truly appreciate your advice on the Clinic's claim that Rapid Tests for HIV 1/2 are indeed effective at 4 week period and that their accuracy is 95% or higher.
Thank you for your post and welcome to our forum.
A negative antibody test at 4 weeks, even though highly reassuring, cannot be considered conclusive at that period of time. Certinaly a test with a reliability of 95% is not conclusive. Current UK guidelines still consider this test to be only concluisve if negative after 12 weeks. However in practice 8 weeks would suffice to consider it conclusive.
At 4 weeks we can only consider the HIV Duo test of 4th generation as conclusive as it also detects the p24 antigen.
Dear Doc, please allow me to add a third question to the two originally asked. If you answer yes to rapid tests being effective at 4 weeks and with an accuracy in excess of 95%, would you term the test results being conclusive, or further testing at a later mark be necessary, let say at 8 or 12 weeks? My apologies for adding this third question later. Thank you
This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. Med Help International, Inc. is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.