I read a wonderfully interesting reply of your about the probabilities of infection (you estimated the chance of a Vegas CSW of being positive at 1/1000, estimated the per-act risk of unprotected vag. intercourse and went from there .. http://www.medhelp.org/posts/HIV---Prevention/Accuracy-of-5-Week-HIV-and-STD-Test/show/932651 )
I've read that while it is very hard to estimate the per contact risk transmission of receptive oral sex without ejaculation (including accounting for viral load, oral lesions, etc.), I've seen it's about 1/2,500 and the risk described as 'very low' or 'very, very low'. However, assuming that I had some mouth ulcers at the time, there was copius preseminal fluid, and the fact he was positive, it is not a non-zero possibility...can you give your thoughts if you don't mind? I imagine a 1-day course of PEP wouldn't affect the AB testing window period as well, so my 38-day negative AB test, along with my 18-day negative RNA test should give more reassurance? Thank you so much.
There is really no point in asking for additional input from either me or Dr. Hook, once the other has responded. We never significantly disagree with one another and our advice is generally identical -- even if our writing styles are somewhat different.
I will just say that the test results you posted in your other thread are 100% conclusive: you didn't catch HIV. I agree that a single day of PEP drugs doesn't change anything. Since it is certain you were not infected, it is a pointless waste of time (yours and mine) and emotional energy (yours) to worry about what the odds of infection may have been. The bottom line is that you didn't catch HIV and should do your best to stop obsessing about it.
Thank so much for your reply and time, I am very grateful for your expert opinion (and as a winner of the ASTDA Lifetime Achievement Award) , and your replies to others with unreasonable anxiety and fear show great patience and compassion. At the risk of appearing to excessively post 'yes, but' or 'are you sure?' could you please help me understand the reasoning to help me move on? Was it the time between tests? The low risk? I see and hear so much conflicting information on different tests and timelines.
I realize there may be no need to post further negative test results, but a 7 weeks (51 days) rapid AB test (Clearview Stat-Pak) was also negative.
To recap: low risk exposure: 1-time unprotective receptive oral with HIV+ partner (I may have had oral sores)
Negative Tests: Uni-Gold AB, at 15,17, and 38 days; unknown (not sure if lab or not) AB test (not sure what it was) at 18 days. RNA PCR Quant. <48 at 18 days. neg. Clearview at 51 days.
I've seen conflicting info. on the reliability/sensitivity of Clearview (2nd gen) in early conversion (not as sensitive as 3rd EIA/Ag test, and not much better than WB ~5 days earlier so tends to miss early/AHI. What about the various 'official' (depending on who says it) window periods? Is it just covering liability for the very rare people? I do thank you for your time and do not want to waste it, and would like to move on.
You do not have HIV, and test results always overrule symptoms and exposure history. Your negative test results prove something other than HIV is the cause of any and all symptoms you may develop.
Thanks for the kind words, but that will end this thread. I have no further comments or advice. Do your best to accept the overwhelming scientific evidence and the repeated, reasoned, science-based reassurance you have had from multiple sources.
Copyright 1994-2016 MedHelp International. All rights reserved.
MedHelp is a division of Aptus Health.
This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. Med Help International, Inc. is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.