1. Correct, the number is not relevant to your result. Negative is negative.
2. If you had an ineterminant result you woul have been told and further testing to address the issue would have been done automatically
3. Correct.
Why are you still worrying? You have a conclusive negative result. Time for you to let this go an move forward. EWH
Doctor, can I just ask one more thing. When I got my result last week I remembered there was a number alongside the negative result. I assume this is what is referred to as an index value?
1. I cant remember what that number was but I assume it's of no concern as I was told the result was negative.
2. I assume if there was a problem then I would've been informed that my sample was being retested - is this what's called an indeterminate result?
3. Basically labs don't ignore any samples that could be borderline?
Thank you
You didn't need a repeat test from a medical perspective. Your additional negative test confirms that you did not get HIV from the encounter you were concerned about. EWH
Hi Doctor, just to let you know that for piece of mind I went and got an antibody only test and it was negative.
combined with my negative Duo last week, that's pretty good news isn't it?
Thank you. I feel much better. So I've never been infected nor infected my husband?
That's my last comment. As you say - time to stop worrying
Yes, in fact any test taken more than 8 weeks after exposure is conclusive. Time to stop worrying. EWH
Thank you for replying especially on a Saturday.
I have seen replies from both doctors that anything over 3 months is 100% conclusive.
So I can be rest assured that my 11 month neg is concrete evidence that I didn't get HIV?
Thank you
Not quite. Before testing your risk for infection was very, very low but there was a single episode of unprotected genital intercourse with a low risk partner which, theoretically, could have lead to infection. With your negative HIV test however, you can be confident that you did not acquire HIV. EWH
Thank you doctor. Your comments have been helpful.
It was only point 3 that made me feel not so confident. I would've thought the test at 11 months was 100% conclusive that I was never infected?
Unless I have interpreted your comment incorrectly. Or were you saying that my risk was non-existent before testing?
I just want to be sure that i'm not infected or have infected my husband. Thank you.
Welcome to our Forum. The short answer is that you are OK. A DUO test taken 11 months after exposure provides highly reliable results and shows that you did not get HIV from your exposures. Several comments to amplify what I've just said:
1. Your partner. The likelihood that a heterosexual male in the UK has HIV is very, very low. Let that a 0.1% chance (i.e. one in a thousand). When you combine this with the low probability of transmission of infection in the unlikely situation that he might have been infected, you can see that even before testing there was little risk of HIV.
2. Your exposures. There is virtually no risk of HIV form oral sex, even if your partner was infected. The quoted figure for HIV risk, if one has oral sex with an infected partner is less than 1 in 10,000 and, in my estimation that is too high. Some experts state there is no risk at all from oral sex. Neither of us on this site have ever seen or reading the medical literature of a convincing instance in which HIV was passed by oral sex. As for the brief vaginal exposure, HIV is transmitted only once in every 1000 exposures so again, the odds are very much in your favor.
3. Then, when you factor in the results of your recent HIV test, you can combine these numbers and appreciate that your risk if HIV is virtually non-existent.
There is absolutely no reason for concern that you got HIV from the encounters you describe. I hope my comments are reassuring. EWH