I stopped reading after the first couple of sentences. Condom-protected vaginal sex and receiving oral sex are zero risk for HIV transmission (or close enough to zero to disregard) even if your partner had HIV, which she probably didn't. Therefore, no matter what symptoms you have, they cannot be due to HIV from that exposure.
Now I have read the rest of your question. As I have said innumerable times, NO SYMPTOMS RELIABLY INDICATE NEW HIV INFECTION! That's because every single symptom of acute HIV infection occurs in many other medical conditions that are much more comon than HIV. And in any case, you don't describe any symtpoms that suggest HIV or any other STD. And the risk for other STDs also is very low in view of the nature of the exposure.
Bottom line: I see no cause for concern. Of course see a health care provider if you remain uncertain or decide you still want to be tested. All sexually active people outside committed relationships should have periodic testing for HIV and other STDs, such as once a year. If you haven't been tested recently, this might be a good time, since it's on your mind. But this advice has nothing to do with your sexual adventures in Crete or with your symptoms.
HHH, MD
Thank you. I was more concerned about the damaged hair follicle and broken skin coming in contact with HIV+ vaginal fluid vise protected sex. I understand, it is probably less than .005% or something. Not sure of amount of blood or vaginal secretion that would have to be inducted into the area?
PS. Mandatory HIV testing yearly in my proefession. Neg tests for 18 yrs.
No data on that specific point. But as a guess, I would bet that 10% of all people having sex do so with inflamed hair follicles or other lesiosn that could come in contact with their partners' secretions. Therefore, the low risk per episode of vaginal sex takes that sort of factor into account and I cannot imagine it measurably increases the transmission risk. It takes lots of HIV to transmit infection; even sharp instrument injuries with overt exposure to contaminated blood carries a transmission risk of only 1 in several hundred.