No. Never.
And no need to repeat myself again. This will end this thread. There will be no further answers. EWH
Dear Dr,
One last question, Have ever ever seen somebody get infected this way? Is this still valid as a proper usage of condom?
Thank you very much...
Glad to help. Take care. EWH
Hi Dr. Hook
Thank you very much.
I fell bit better now, But I will go for that test.
No risk means no risk. If she were infected, her viral load would be irrelevant. A 4 week 4th generation test that tests for both the p24 antigen of HIV and HIV antibody would be completely reliable and the results should be believed. (They will be negative). EWH
Thank you very much Dr. Hook.
I have seen this comment in few archives, when you say it is not a risk, does it compare with a lady with HIV and very very high viral load?
I'm worrying about my headaches.
How accurate will be 4th generation antibody test at 4 week's? will it be conclusive for this type of exposure?
Thank you very much.
Welcome to our Forum. You are not at risk from the exposure that you describe an do not need to worry. Even among "lower class" commercial sex workers, most are not infected with HIV. Even if she was, her actions would not have put you at risk for HIV. As you know, condom protected sex is safe sex and that she might have transferred some of her vaginal secretions to the inside of the condom as she put it on you does not change this. HIV is not effectively transferred from person to person on hands and transfer from her genitals to her hand to the condom to you is just not a risk.
You do not need to worry, you really do not need to test except perhaps for your peace of mind and you do not need to worry about exposing your wife to HIV as a result of this exposure.
I hope this comment is helpful. You are not at risk for HIV from the activities you describe. EWH