About ten years ago I had a one-time experience with a female sex worker in Madrid, Spain at a commercial sex club. I used a condom and from what I could tell there was no breakage. Thereafter, I grew very concerned about my potential exposure to HIV and consulted a doctor there about my risk. The doctor with whom I consulted indicated that I posed virtually no risk. At that time, he suggested that I go obtain an HIV test between 4-6 weeks from that date. About 35 days later I took an HIV blood test and tested HIV-negative. Thereafter I discussed the results with him and he assured me I was HIV negative.
Then, about 6-7 years ago, I developed an infection in the mouth and tongue. I grew immediately concerned after reading about the relationship between mouth infections and HIV online and consulted a doctor about it. Although he didn't have a definitive diagnosis (as it had almost completely subsided by the time I saw him), he was not concerned and assured me that it was not related to HIV. It cleared up on its own.
In the last couple of weeks, I have grown super concerned about whether the test I took almost 10 years ago was reliable and whether that mouth infection could have been HIV-related. The doctor in Spain did not recommend a follow-up at 3 months or 6 months. Would the doctor's advice have been valid almost 10 years ago?
Welcome to the Forum. The exposure you describe, condom protected sex with a commercial sex worker is a no risk exposure for HIV and we would not even recommend HIV testing for such an exposure today. Admittedly, 10 years ago the HIV tests were not so good as they are now but the tests use at that time still would have detected over 90% of recent HIV infections 4 weeks following an exposure.
The symptoms you describe since that time do not raise any concern about HIV and are most likely coincidence and nothing more.
If you feel you need an HIV test at this time for your own peace of mind, I have no objection but when that test comes back negative as I am confident it will, please believe the result. As I said, the exposure you describe was no risk for HIV.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. MedHelp is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.