I am not sure what post your are referring to. I am not aware of any persons who was found to have HIV at 6 months following exposure on our Forum,. I stand by my earlier response to you and that your 15 week test was negative proves this. You have no reason for concern. EWH
Hi
After reading your response I read on the forum that a person who tested negative to HIV turned postive after six months which really scared me. With this in my very nervous mind I had another test at 15weeks (105 days after the fact) which came back negative. The doctor called me with the results so I am not sure which test this
was for HIV. Is there any chance in the future that my system might produce HIV from your professional and scientific view. I understand your conment about people on anti-HIV therapy but could there be any other reason for a person like me to have a positive result after the type of tests I.ve had?. Thank you
Welcome to the Forum. At 6 weeks the antibody detection component of the combination tests will detect at least 95% of persons who acquired HIV 6 weeks earlier. The additional detection provided by antigen testing decreases the probability that you acquired HIV still more, particularly when you have been tested twice, at 25 days and 6 weeks. At this time, following a single exposure to a partner who is a CSW, your risk of having HIV is effectively zero. There is no reason for you to worry further or to abstain from sex with your regular partner.
The 4th generation tests are the best currently available. Some people would say a PCR test is preferable but we see more false positive tests with PCR than with antibody or combo tests such as the one you were tested with. We do not recommend the PCR test in your situation.
I would consider your current result definitive. You do not need further testing.
I neither have had a patient nor have heard of a person whose test has become positive later than 6 weeks following exposure unless that person was taking anti-HIV therapy in an unsuccessful attempt to prevent infection; in all such instances these have been following needle stick exposures, not sexual.
Hope this helps. you are in the clear. EWH