I scanned your several previous threads and posts on this and the HIV communty forum. As Dr. Hook has told you (in response to two different questions) you clearly are abnormally obsessed with HIV risks.
Having said that, of course a sharp instrument injury in a medical setting could carry some risk. But a negative 4th generation HIV test (i.e. combo test for both HIV antibody and p24 antigen) is 100% reliable any time 4 weeks or more after exposure. Your test result proves unequivocally that you did not acquire HIV from the needlestick event described. And anyway, you also know that the patient didn't have HIV, so I'm not sure why you felt a need to be tested once that result was known (except for your admitted OCD, of course).
From a medical or risk assessment perspective, you don't need further testing, despite official advice for testing at 3 months. (Six months is for sure not necessary. Anyone who recommends it is not up to speed on modern HIV testing.) For more information about this, see the thread linked below.
Let's not have any "yes but" or "what if" questions. Nervous people in general, and those with OCD in particular, usually find themselves thinking about exceptions to the rule. But trust me on this: there are NO scenarios that can your anxious mind can construct that would change my opinion or advice, so there is no point in asking. You don't have HIV, and that's that.
Here is the thread about test reliability at various times after exposure:
http://www.medhelp.org/posts/show/1704700
Regards-- HHH, MD